Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Boston studies in the philosophy of science

How the History of Thermodynamics Informs the Hidden Variables Debate in Quantum Mechanics

Adam Forrest Kay

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-49861-9_14

Related papers

Entanglement Before Geometry: Emergent Space and a Parallel History of Physics Since 1935

Jincheng Zhang

In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published their famous EPR Paradox paper, viewing the nonlocality of quantum mechanics as evidence of theoretical incompleteness, thus initiating a debate that lasted for more than half a century regarding "hidden variables" and "the reality of classical locality." However, if history had taken a subtle turn here—if EPR had not viewed nonlocal correlation as an inherent flaw in quantum mechanics, but rather as a profound signal that "space itself is not a fundamental physical structure"—the entire evolutionary path of 20th-century theoretical physics would have been completely rewritten. This paper explores the profound impact of this counterfactual historical bifurcation on the development of modern physics. We examine how, in this parallel history, space was redefined as the macroscopic emergence of quantum correlation networks, and how quantum gravity theory achieved a breakthrough half a century earlier. By using quantum entanglement as a fundamental building block of spacetime geometry, we reconstruct the theoretical evolutionary trajectory from quantum information to spacetime topology, showing that "correlation precedes geometry" is not only a paradigm shift in the philosophy of physics, but also a potential ultimate path to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity.

•Jul 25, 2026•0 citations

Introduction to Quantum Thermodynamics: History and Prospects

Robert Alicki, Ronnie Kosloff

arXiv:1801.08314•Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2018•131 citations

Schrödinger's unpublished hidden-variable model in the 1944-45 debate over the "Collapse of Determinism"

Flavio Del Santo

In the mid-1940s, the question of whether quantum mechanics could be supplemented by deterministic hidden variables resurfaced in a debate in ^textit{Nature}. I show that Erwin Schrödinger drafted a hitherto unpublished response to this controversy. In it, Schrödinger provided an explicit hidden-variable model, thereby showing that such models could not be ruled out. I reconstruct the historical context of this forgotten manuscript and publish here the first transcription and analysis. Importantly, Schrödinger's proposal should be understood as a proof of principle rather than as evidence of his commitment to determinism.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2610.20752•Oct 16, 2026•0 citations

Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics Reconsidered

Stanley Gudder

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1968•34 citations

Quantum-Information Conservation. The Problem About ‘Hidden Variables’, or the ‘Conservation of Energy Conservation’ in Quantum Mechanics: A Historical Lesson for Future Discoveries

Vasil Dinev Penchev

The explicit history of the “hidden variables” problem is well-known and established. The main events of its chronology are traced. An implicit context of that history is suggested. It links the problem with the “conservation of energy conservation” in quantum mechanics. Bohr, Kramers, and Slaters (1924) admitted its violation being due to the “fourth Heisenberg uncertainty”, that of energy in relation to time. Wolfgang Pauli rejected the conjecture and even forecast the existence of a new and unknown then elementary particle, neutrino, on the ground of energy conservation in quantum mechanics, afterwards confirmed experimentally. Bohr recognized his defeat and Pauli’s truth: the paradigm of elementary particles (furthermore underlying the Standard model) dominates nowadays. However, the reason of energy conservation in quantum mechanics is quite different from that in classical mechanics (the Lie group of all translations in time). Even more, if the reason was the latter, Bohr, Cramers, and Slatters’s argument would be valid. The link between the “conservation of energy conservation” and the problem of hidden variables is the following: the former is equivalent to their absence. The same can be verified historically by the unification of Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics in the contemporary quantum mechanics by means of the separable complex Hilbert space. The Heisenberg version relies on the vector interpretation of Hilbert space, and the Schrödinger one, on the wave-function interpretation. However the both are equivalent to each other only under the additional condition that a certain well-ordering is equivalent to the corresponding ordinal number (as in Neumann’s definition of “ordinal number”). The same condition interpreted in the proper terms of quantum mechanics means its “unitarity”, therefore the “conservation of energy conservation”. In other words, the “conservation of energy conservation” is postulated in the foundations of quantum mechanics by means of the concept of the separable complex Hilbert space, which furthermore is equivalent to postulating the absence of hidden variables in quantum mechanics (directly deducible from the properties of that Hilbert space). Further, the lesson of that unification (of Heisenberg’s approach and Schrödinger’s version) can be directly interpreted in terms of the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics in the cherished “quantum gravity” as well as a “manual” of how one can do this considering them as isomorphic to each other in a new mathematical structure corresponding to quantum information. Even more, the condition of the unification is analogical to that in the historical precedent of the unifying mathematical structure (namely the separable complex Hilbert space of quantum mechanics) and consists in the class of equivalence of any smooth deformations of the pseudo-Riemannian space of general relativity: each element of that class is a wave function and vice versa as well. Thus, quantum mechanics can be considered as a “thermodynamic version” of general relativity, after which the universe is observed as if “outside” (similarly to a phenomenological thermodynamic system observable only “outside” as a whole). The statistical approach to that “phenomenological thermodynamics” of quantum mechanics implies Gibbs classes of equivalence of all states of the universe, furthermore re-presentable in Boltzmann’s manner implying general relativity properly … The meta-lesson is that the historical lesson can serve for future discoveries.

•Jan 1, 2020•37 citations

The philosophical background of hidden variables in quantum mechanics

Kurt H�bner

Continental Philosophy Review•Nov 1, 1973•1 citation
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published their famous EPR Paradox paper, viewing the nonlocality of quantum mechanics as evidence of theoretical incompleteness, thus initiating a debate that lasted for more than half a century regarding "hidden variables" and "the reality of classical locality." However, if history had taken a subtle turn here—if EPR had not viewed nonlocal correlation as an inherent flaw in quantum mechanics, but rather as a profound signal that "space itself is not a fundamental physical structure"—the entire evolutionary path of 20th-century theoretical physics would have been completely rewritten. This paper explores the profound impact of this counterfactual historical bifurcation on the development of modern physics. We examine how, in this parallel history, space was redefined as the macroscopic emergence of quantum correlation networks, and how quantum gravity theory achieved a breakthrough half a century earlier. By using quantum entanglement as a fundamental building block of spacetime geometry, we reconstruct the theoretical evolutionary trajectory from quantum information to spacetime topology, showing that "correlation precedes geometry" is not only a paradigm shift in the philosophy of physics, but also a potential ultimate path to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity.
In the mid-1940s, the question of whether quantum mechanics could be supplemented by deterministic hidden variables resurfaced in a debate in ^textit{Nature}. I show that Erwin Schrödinger drafted a hitherto unpublished response to this controversy. In it, Schrödinger provided an explicit hidden-variable model, thereby showing that such models could not be ruled out. I reconstruct the historical context of this forgotten manuscript and publish here the first transcription and analysis. Importantly, Schrödinger's proposal should be understood as a proof of principle rather than as evidence of his commitment to determinism.
The explicit history of the “hidden variables” problem is well-known and established. The main events of its chronology are traced. An implicit context of that history is suggested. It links the problem with the “conservation of energy conservation” in quantum mechanics. Bohr, Kramers, and Slaters (1924) admitted its violation being due to the “fourth Heisenberg uncertainty”, that of energy in relation to time. Wolfgang Pauli rejected the conjecture and even forecast the existence of a new and unknown then elementary particle, neutrino, on the ground of energy conservation in quantum mechanics, afterwards confirmed experimentally. Bohr recognized his defeat and Pauli’s truth: the paradigm of elementary particles (furthermore underlying the Standard model) dominates nowadays. However, the reason of energy conservation in quantum mechanics is quite different from that in classical mechanics (the Lie group of all translations in time). Even more, if the reason was the latter, Bohr, Cramers, and Slatters’s argument would be valid. The link between the “conservation of energy conservation” and the problem of hidden variables is the following: the former is equivalent to their absence. The same can be verified historically by the unification of Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics in the contemporary quantum mechanics by means of the separable complex Hilbert space. The Heisenberg version relies on the vector interpretation of Hilbert space, and the Schrödinger one, on the wave-function interpretation. However the both are equivalent to each other only under the additional condition that a certain well-ordering is equivalent to the corresponding ordinal number (as in Neumann’s definition of “ordinal number”). The same condition interpreted in the proper terms of quantum mechanics means its “unitarity”, therefore the “conservation of energy conservation”. In other words, the “conservation of energy conservation” is postulated in the foundations of quantum mechanics by means of the concept of the separable complex Hilbert space, which furthermore is equivalent to postulating the absence of hidden variables in quantum mechanics (directly deducible from the properties of that Hilbert space). Further, the lesson of that unification (of Heisenberg’s approach and Schrödinger’s version) can be directly interpreted in terms of the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics in the cherished “quantum gravity” as well as a “manual” of how one can do this considering them as isomorphic to each other in a new mathematical structure corresponding to quantum information. Even more, the condition of the unification is analogical to that in the historical precedent of the unifying mathematical structure (namely the separable complex Hilbert space of quantum mechanics) and consists in the class of equivalence of any smooth deformations of the pseudo-Riemannian space of general relativity: each element of that class is a wave function and vice versa as well. Thus, quantum mechanics can be considered as a “thermodynamic version” of general relativity, after which the universe is observed as if “outside” (similarly to a phenomenological thermodynamic system observable only “outside” as a whole). The statistical approach to that “phenomenological thermodynamics” of quantum mechanics implies Gibbs classes of equivalence of all states of the universe, furthermore re-presentable in Boltzmann’s manner implying general relativity properly … The meta-lesson is that the historical lesson can serve for future discoveries.