Entanglement Detection Considering Experimental Inaccuracies

Simon Morelli, Hayata Yamasaki, Marcus Huber +1 more

We investigate entanglement detection when the local measurements only nearly correspond to those intended. This corresponds to a scenario in which measurement devices are not perfectly controlled, but nevertheless operate with bounded inaccuracy. We formalize this through an operational notion of inaccuracy that can be estimated directly in the lab. To demonstrate the relevance of this approach, we show that small magnitudes of inaccuracy can significantly compromise several well-known entanglement witnesses. For two arbitrary-dimensional systems, we show how to compute tight corrections to a family of standard entanglement witnesses due to any given level of measurement inaccuracy. We also develop semidefinite programming methods to bound correlations in these scenarios.

Barbara M. Terhal

Paranjoy Chaki, Kornikar Sen, Ujjwal Sen

Loopholes present in an experimental set-up can significantly affect the reliability of entanglement detection. We discuss two methods for detection of entanglement: one is by using the positive partial transposition criterion after quantum state tomography and the other by estimating the second and third moments of partial transposition of the quantum state through random classical snapshots. We examine the impact of inaccuracies in these detection methods by considering presence of spurious clicks or suppression of valid clicks in the detectors. By comparing the two methods, we observe that the condition based on partial transposition moments is more robust to missing counts than the positive partial transposition criteria. Moreover, we realize that in the presence of additional counts, none of the criteria misinterpret any separable state as entangled. But in such a scenario, the condition based on the moments can not guarantee any state as entangled, unless the additional event efficiency is about 0.9 or higher.

Dagmar Bruβ

Yansa Lu, Zhihua Chen, Yuan-Hong Tao

Abstract In the noisy intermediate‐scale quantum (NISQ) era, multipartite entanglement in realistic noisy environments exhibits complex structures. Characterizing entanglement structures—particularly entanglement depth and intactness—has become increasingly essential for quantum information processing tasks. Traditional methods like standard entanglement witnesses assume that experimenters can exactly implement specific quantum measurements. Even minor inaccuracies in standard witness can introduce significant errors in entanglement detection. Certification methods are proposed with relaxed assumptions about the system and measurements for entanglement structures. First, entanglement states are classified with the same intactness into three distinct types based on their depth. Next, analytical witnesses are derived to detect the entanglement structure of general n‐qubit systems in both device‐independent and semi‐device‐independent scenarios, where some observables are untrusted while others remain reliable. Furthermore, this framework is extended to account for small measurement imperfections, ensuring robustness in practical settings. It is demonstrated that this witness can detect larger entanglement regions compared to previous Bell‐type inequalities. Remarkably, for Type I 4‐partite quantum states, this entanglement witness with measurement imperfections is identical to both device‐dependent and semi‐device‐independent approaches.

Carolina Alves