Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Continuous Measurement: Quantum Jump Case

Andrew N. Jordan, Irfan A. Siddiqi

Published Feb 15, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In Chapter 6, we discuss quantum jumps, or leaps, beginning with a historical discussion of quantum jumps, or leaps, and giving the motivating example of blinking atoms in trapped ions and quantum jumps in superconducting circuits. Despite the disruptive name, we discuss how jumps fit into the category of continuous measurement. In some cases, quantum jumps can be predicted, and even reversed. We build up the mathematical formalism by discussing the quantum Zeno effect, Lindblad-type master equations, leading to jump and no-jump dynamics - an inseparable combination of discrete and continuous dynamics. In fact, the discrete nature of the jump is illusory. We discuss the dynamics of a quantum jump and the transition from jumps to diffusion.

DOI
10.1017/9781009103909.007

Related papers

Continuous Measurement: Diffusive Case

Andrew N. Jordan, Irfan A. Siddiqi

Chapter 5 considers the case of diffusive continuous measurements, where the measurement outcomes and quantum state dynamics are analogous to a Brownian noise process. We motivate this type of measurement by considering the example of a double quantum dot system being measured by a quantum point contact. The intrinsic shot noise of the measurement naturally brings about an effective time-continuous measurement. A second example of a superconducting circuit made from Josephson junctions readout with a microwave frequency electromagnetic wave is also discussed in detail. The mathematics of quantum trajectory theory is then pedagogically built up, resulting in the stochastic Schrodinger equation, the stochastic master equation, and the stochastic path integral. We also discuss experimental data and its comparison with this theoretical formalism. These experiments allow us to peer into the inner workings of wavefunction collapse, giving an empirical handle on the many philosophical issues that arise in quantum measurement.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 15, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Jumps: Schrödinger’s Objections and the Contemporary Points of View

Sotirios A. Sakkopoulos

In 1913, when Bohr’s atom allowed electron jumps between discrete orbits, it was impossible to experiment on single atoms and study individually these jumps. Many people considered them not real, but something artificial for the explanation of the linear spectra of atoms. Especially Schrödinger rejected the image of negatively charged electrons orbiting around the nucleus and in particular their jumps from orbit to orbit. Finally, in 1986 single atoms (ions) laser cooled and confined in an electromagnetic trap gave the possibility to investigate experimentally electron jumps to and fro a metastable state. Recently, physicists experimenting on a macroscopic superconducting circuit with discrete quantum states analogous to a natural atom were able to halt and reverse quantum jumps mid-flight revealing very interesting details of them.

Sumerianz Journal of Scientific Research•Dec 17, 2021•0 citations

Instantaneous and Sequential Measurements

Michael B. Mensky

This chapter reviews the main points in the theory of instantaneous measurements. A description of continuous measurements as limits of series of instantaneous measurements turns out to be very cumbersome and in fact inadequate. A characteristic feature of quantum systems is that measurements in them unavoidably affect their dynamics. The well known manifestation of this back reaction is the uncertainty principle, discussion of which can be found in any textbook on quantum mechanics. The operator plays the role of a propagator for a quantum system under continuous measurement. The quantum Zeno effect is an example of a continuous measurement giving a trivial result. However, this is a consequence of the very special character of the measurement procedure described by a discrete set of orthogonal projectors each of which is a bounded operator. The description of approximate measurements was derived for the case when precise measurement is a discrete-spectrum measurement.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 19, 2017•0 citations

An overview of continuous quantum measurements and its implications

A-B A Mohamed, E K Jaradat, A. M. Alotaibi +1 more

Abstract Quantum measurement has always been thought of as a formal, sudden projection that changes the system state instantly. However, in real life, the process of measurement involves a physical interaction that takes time to gather the information. The paper discusses the continuous quantum measurement that challenges the traditional instant measurement idea with the detector’s accumulated data continuously uninterruptedly. The paper starts by laying down the basic mathematics, which gradually leads to the modern Stochastic master equations and quantum trajectories through generalized measurements positive operator-valued measures and quantum instruments. The crucial experimental setups like circuit QED, trapped ions, and optomechanics are delineated where these notions have been put into practice. The significant ramifications of ongoing observation are then discussed, starting with the fundamental Zeno effect, measurement backaction, and continuing through the active steering of quantum states and the emergence of measurement-induced phase transitions in many-body systems. One of the main ideas of the paper is the attribute of measurement as a powerful control method which enables real-time feedback, state stabilization, and continuous quantum error correction. Finally, the paper points out the open problems that remain in the areas of many-body systems’ scalability and the coupling of machine learning with real-time quantum control.

Laser Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

To Catch and Reverse a Quantum Jump Mid-Flight (In Russian)

Zlatko Minev, Shantanu Mundhada, Shyam Shankar

Quantum physics was invented to account for two fundamental features of measurement results their discreetness and randomness. Emblematic of these features is the Bohr idea of quantum jumps between two discrete energy levels of an atom. Experimentally, quantum jumps were first observed in an atomic ion driven by a weak deterministic force while under strong continuous energy measurement. The times at which the discontinuous jump transitions occur are reputed to be fundamentally unpredictable. Can there be, despite the indeterminism of quantum physics, a possibility to know if a quantum jump is about to occur or not? Here, we answer this question affirmatively by experimentally demonstrating that the jump from the ground to an excited state of a superconducting artificial three-level atom can be tracked as it follows a predictable flight, by monitoring the population of an auxiliary energy level coupled to the ground state. The experimental results demonstrate that the jump evolution when completed is continuous, coherent, and deterministic. Furthermore, exploiting these features and using real-time monitoring and feedback, we catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight, thus deterministically preventing its completion. Our results, which agree with theoretical predictions essentially without adjustable parameters, support the modern quantum trajectory theory and provide new ground for the exploration of real-time intervention techniques in the control of quantum systems, such as early detection of error syndromes.

•Jul 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum trajectories

Howard M. Wiseman, Gerard J Milburn

Introduction A very general concept of a quantum trajectory would be the path taken by the state of a quantum system over time. This state could be conditioned upon measurement results, as we considered in Chapter 1. This is the sort of quantum trajectory we are most interested in, and it is generally stochastic in nature. In ordinary use, the word trajectory usually implies a path that is also continuous in time. This idea is not always applicable to quantum systems, but we can maintain its essence by defining a quantum trajectory as the path taken by the conditional state of a quantum system for which the unconditioned system state evolves continuously. As explained in Chapter 1, the unconditioned state is that obtained by averaging over the random measurement results which condition the system. With this motivation, we begin in Section 4.2 by deriving the simplest sort of quantum trajectory, which involves jumps (that is, discontinuous conditioned evolution). In the process we will reproduce Lindblad's general form for continuous Markovian quantum evolution as presented in Section 3.6. In Section 4.3 we relate these quantum jumps to photon-counting measurements on the bath for the model introduced in Section 3.11, and also derive correlation functions for these measurement records. In Section 4.4 we consider the addition of a coherent field (the ‘local oscillator’) to the output before detection. In the limit of a strong local oscillator this is called homodyne detection, and is described by a continuous (diffusive) quantum trajectory.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 12, 2009•0 citations
In Chapter 6, we discuss quantum jumps, or leaps, beginning with a historical discussion of quantum jumps, or leaps, and giving the motivating example of blinking atoms in trapped ions and quantum jumps in superconducting circuits. Despite the disruptive name, we discuss how jumps fit into the category of continuous measurement. In some cases, quantum jumps can be predicted, and even reversed. We build up the mathematical formalism by discussing the quantum Zeno effect, Lindblad-type master equations, leading to jump and no-jump dynamics - an inseparable combination of discrete and continuous dynamics. In fact, the discrete nature of the jump is illusory. We discuss the dynamics of a quantum jump and the transition from jumps to diffusion.
Chapter 5 considers the case of diffusive continuous measurements, where the measurement outcomes and quantum state dynamics are analogous to a Brownian noise process. We motivate this type of measurement by considering the example of a double quantum dot system being measured by a quantum point contact. The intrinsic shot noise of the measurement naturally brings about an effective time-continuous measurement. A second example of a superconducting circuit made from Josephson junctions readout with a microwave frequency electromagnetic wave is also discussed in detail. The mathematics of quantum trajectory theory is then pedagogically built up, resulting in the stochastic Schrodinger equation, the stochastic master equation, and the stochastic path integral. We also discuss experimental data and its comparison with this theoretical formalism. These experiments allow us to peer into the inner workings of wavefunction collapse, giving an empirical handle on the many philosophical issues that arise in quantum measurement.
In 1913, when Bohr’s atom allowed electron jumps between discrete orbits, it was impossible to experiment on single atoms and study individually these jumps. Many people considered them not real, but something artificial for the explanation of the linear spectra of atoms. Especially Schrödinger rejected the image of negatively charged electrons orbiting around the nucleus and in particular their jumps from orbit to orbit. Finally, in 1986 single atoms (ions) laser cooled and confined in an electromagnetic trap gave the possibility to investigate experimentally electron jumps to and fro a metastable state. Recently, physicists experimenting on a macroscopic superconducting circuit with discrete quantum states analogous to a natural atom were able to halt and reverse quantum jumps mid-flight revealing very interesting details of them.
This chapter reviews the main points in the theory of instantaneous measurements. A description of continuous measurements as limits of series of instantaneous measurements turns out to be very cumbersome and in fact inadequate. A characteristic feature of quantum systems is that measurements in them unavoidably affect their dynamics. The well known manifestation of this back reaction is the uncertainty principle, discussion of which can be found in any textbook on quantum mechanics. The operator plays the role of a propagator for a quantum system under continuous measurement. The quantum Zeno effect is an example of a continuous measurement giving a trivial result. However, this is a consequence of the very special character of the measurement procedure described by a discrete set of orthogonal projectors each of which is a bounded operator. The description of approximate measurements was derived for the case when precise measurement is a discrete-spectrum measurement.
Abstract Quantum measurement has always been thought of as a formal, sudden projection that changes the system state instantly. However, in real life, the process of measurement involves a physical interaction that takes time to gather the information. The paper discusses the continuous quantum measurement that challenges the traditional instant measurement idea with the detector’s accumulated data continuously uninterruptedly. The paper starts by laying down the basic mathematics, which gradually leads to the modern Stochastic master equations and quantum trajectories through generalized measurements positive operator-valued measures and quantum instruments. The crucial experimental setups like circuit QED, trapped ions, and optomechanics are delineated where these notions have been put into practice. The significant ramifications of ongoing observation are then discussed, starting with the fundamental Zeno effect, measurement backaction, and continuing through the active steering of quantum states and the emergence of measurement-induced phase transitions in many-body systems. One of the main ideas of the paper is the attribute of measurement as a powerful control method which enables real-time feedback, state stabilization, and continuous quantum error correction. Finally, the paper points out the open problems that remain in the areas of many-body systems’ scalability and the coupling of machine learning with real-time quantum control.
Quantum physics was invented to account for two fundamental features of measurement results their discreetness and randomness. Emblematic of these features is the Bohr idea of quantum jumps between two discrete energy levels of an atom. Experimentally, quantum jumps were first observed in an atomic ion driven by a weak deterministic force while under strong continuous energy measurement. The times at which the discontinuous jump transitions occur are reputed to be fundamentally unpredictable. Can there be, despite the indeterminism of quantum physics, a possibility to know if a quantum jump is about to occur or not? Here, we answer this question affirmatively by experimentally demonstrating that the jump from the ground to an excited state of a superconducting artificial three-level atom can be tracked as it follows a predictable flight, by monitoring the population of an auxiliary energy level coupled to the ground state. The experimental results demonstrate that the jump evolution when completed is continuous, coherent, and deterministic. Furthermore, exploiting these features and using real-time monitoring and feedback, we catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight, thus deterministically preventing its completion. Our results, which agree with theoretical predictions essentially without adjustable parameters, support the modern quantum trajectory theory and provide new ground for the exploration of real-time intervention techniques in the control of quantum systems, such as early detection of error syndromes.
Introduction A very general concept of a quantum trajectory would be the path taken by the state of a quantum system over time. This state could be conditioned upon measurement results, as we considered in Chapter 1. This is the sort of quantum trajectory we are most interested in, and it is generally stochastic in nature. In ordinary use, the word trajectory usually implies a path that is also continuous in time. This idea is not always applicable to quantum systems, but we can maintain its essence by defining a quantum trajectory as the path taken by the conditional state of a quantum system for which the unconditioned system state evolves continuously. As explained in Chapter 1, the unconditioned state is that obtained by averaging over the random measurement results which condition the system. With this motivation, we begin in Section 4.2 by deriving the simplest sort of quantum trajectory, which involves jumps (that is, discontinuous conditioned evolution). In the process we will reproduce Lindblad's general form for continuous Markovian quantum evolution as presented in Section 3.6. In Section 4.3 we relate these quantum jumps to photon-counting measurements on the bath for the model introduced in Section 3.11, and also derive correlation functions for these measurement records. In Section 4.4 we consider the addition of a coherent field (the ‘local oscillator’) to the output before detection. In the limit of a strong local oscillator this is called homodyne detection, and is described by a continuous (diffusive) quantum trajectory.