Abstract Before examining experimental consequences of CSL, this chapter discusses the spontaneous localization (SL) theory of Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (GRW). As for CSL, the chapter presents the structure of the theory, and then specializes it to a non-relativistic theory. SL does not add a term to Schrodinger’s equation. Instead, the state vector is suddenly altered by a “hit” (GRW’s ‘spontaneous localization’), that is, multiplication by an operator, followed by renormalization. The hits occur at random times. The chapter shows the specific choice of operator made by GRW for their non-relativistic theory. Emphasized are two aspects of SL that helped the journey to CSL. One is that the collapse is always acting (one need not “turn it on.” The other is the “smeared” character of the GRW operator. The chapter then shows how the density matrix is calculated. Finally, it discusses the numerical values, chosen by GRW, of the two parameters of SL theory, λ and a, that are provisionally adopted for CSL.
Abstract Before examining experimental consequences of CSL, this chapter discusses the spontaneous localization (SL) theory of Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (GRW). As for CSL, the chapter presents the structure of the theory, and then specializes it to a non-relativistic theory. SL does not add a term to Schrodinger’s equation. Instead, the state vector is suddenly altered by a “hit” (GRW’s ‘spontaneous localization’), that is, multiplication by an operator, followed by renormalization. The hits occur at random times. The chapter shows the specific choice of operator made by GRW for their non-relativistic theory. Emphasized are two aspects of SL that helped the journey to CSL. One is that the collapse is always acting (one need not “turn it on.” The other is the “smeared” character of the GRW operator. The chapter then shows how the density matrix is calculated. Finally, it discusses the numerical values, chosen by GRW, of the two parameters of SL theory, λ and a, that are provisionally adopted for CSL.
It has been hypothesized that the time evolution of wavefunctions might include collapses, rather than being governed by the Schrödinger equation. The leading models of such an evolution, Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) and continuous spontaneous localization (CSL), have two parameters (or new constants of nature): the collapse width σ and the collapse rate λ. We draw a diagram of the σλ-plane showing the region that is empirically refuted and the region that is philosophically unsatisfactory.
Abstract This chapter introduces the two equations that completely define CSL, for the simplest case, that is, a state vector in a two-dimensional Hilbert space. One equation is the modified evolution equation for the state vector which depends upon a Brownian motion function of time, B(t), a Hermitian operator A called the “collapse-generating operator,” and a collapse rate parameter λ. The state vector evolution is linear, but not unitary, so its norm changes with time. The second equation is called the probability rule. It says the probability a particular B(t) occurs in Nature is proportional to the squared norm of the state vector, that is, high norm state vectors are most likely to occur. The chapter shows how an initial state vector that is a superposition of the eigenstates of A evolves to one eigenstate, with the Born probability, as predicted by standard quantum theory. Finally, it discusses the density matrix description of the ensemble of evolutions under all possible B(t).
Abstract CSL so far is a general framework to describe dynamical collapse of a statevector to one or another joint eigenstate of a set of mutually commuting collapse-generating operators. This chapter makes the final selection of the collapse generating operators. First, the choice of mass-density operators, A(x)= D(x), is discussed. This leads to an infinite rate of energy increase for particles, which is ameliorated by a slightly different choice, “smeared” mass-density operators, A(x)=∫dx’f(x-x’)D(x’), where f is a Gaussian of width a, f(z) exp-z2/2a2. This introduces a second parameter to the theory (in addition to the collapse rate λ), the width parameter a. This completes construction of non-relativistic CSL, the theory proposed to describe Nature. The chapter goes on to discuss the density matrix, followed by two important calculations, the first consequences of the theory. First, for an initial state that is an object in a superposition of two different places, is the rate to collapse to one or another place, and second, the rate of energy increase of an object due to the wave function narrowing inherent in collapse.
In this volume i.h. of GianCarlo Ghirardi, I discuss my involvement with ideas of dynamical collapse of the state vector. 10 problems are introduced, 9 of which were seen following my initial work. 4 of these problems had a resolution in GianCarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini and Tullio Weber's Spontaneous Localization (SL) model (which added 1 more problem). This stimulated a (somewhat different) resolution of these 5 problems in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model, in which I combined my initial work with SL. In an upcoming volume in h. of Abner Shimony I shall discuss the status of the 5 remaining post-CSL problems.
We discuss a model of spontaneous collapse of the quantum state that does not require adding any stochastic processes to the standard dynamics. The additional ingredient with respect to the wave function is a position in the configuration space which drives the collapse in a completely deterministic way. This new variable is equivalent to a set of positions of all the particles, i.e., a set of Bohmian positions, which obey the usual guiding equation of Bohmian theory. Any superposition of quantum states of a macroscopic object occupying different regions of space is projected by a localization process onto the region occupied by the positions. Since the Bohmian positions are well defined in a single realization of the experiment, a space localization into one region is produced. The mechanism is based on the correlations between these positions arising from the cohesive forces inside macroscopic objects. The model introduces two collapse parameters which play a role very similar to those of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) [Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)] and continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) [Pearle, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989); Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. A 42, 78 (1990)] theories. With appropriate values of these parameters, we check that the corresponding dynamics rapidly projects superpositions of macroscopic states localized in different regions of space into a single region, while it maintains a negligible effect in all situations where the predictions of standard quantum dynamics are known to be correct. We briefly speculate about the possible relations with gravity. We then study the evolution of the density operator and a mean-field approximation of the dynamical equations of this model, as well as the change of the evolution of the momentum introduced by the localization process. Possible theoretical interpretations are discussed. Generally speaking, this model introduces a sharper border between the quantum and classical worlds than the GRW and CSL theories and leaves a broader range of acceptable values for the parameters.
Carrying out a research program outlined by John S. Bell in 1987, we arrive at a relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model of spon-taneous wavefunction collapse. The GRW model was proposed as a solution of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics and involves a stochastic and nonlinear modification of the Schrödinger equation. It deviates very little from the Schrödinger equation for microscopic systems but efficiently suppresses, for macroscopic systems, superpositions of macroscopically different states. As sug-gested by Bell, we take the primitive ontology, or local beables, of our model to be a discrete set of space-time points, at which the collapses are centered. This set is random with distribution determined by the initial wavefunction. Our model is nonlocal and violates Bell’s inequality though it does not make use of a preferred slicing of space-time or any other sort of synchronization of spacelike separated points. Like the GRW model, it reproduces the quantum probabilities in all cases presently testable, though it entails deviations from the quantum formalism that are in principle testable. Our model works in Minkowski space-time as well as in (well-behaved) curved background space-times. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta; 03.65.Ud; 03.30.+p. Key words: spontaneous wave-function collapse; relativity; quantum theory without observers. 1