The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a promising variational quantum algorithm for addressing NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. However, a significant limitation lies in optimizing its classical parameters, which is in itself an NP-hard problem. To circumvent this obstacle, initialization heuristics, enhanced problem encodings and beneficial problem scalings have been proposed. While such strategies further improve QAOA’s performance, their remaining problem is the sole utilization of local optimizers. We show that local optimization methods are inherently inadequate within the complex cost landscape of QAOA. Instead, global optimization techniques greatly improve QAOA’s performance across diverse problem instances. While global optimization generally requires high numbers of function evaluations, we demonstrate how restricted global optimizers still show better performance without requiring an exceeding amount of function evaluations.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a promising variational quantum algorithm for addressing NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. However, a significant limitation lies in optimizing its classical parameters, which is in itself an NP-hard problem. To circumvent this obstacle, initialization heuristics, enhanced problem encodings and beneficial problem scalings have been proposed. While such strategies further improve QAOA’s performance, their remaining problem is the sole utilization of local optimizers. We show that local optimization methods are inherently inadequate within the complex cost landscape of QAOA. Instead, global optimization techniques greatly improve QAOA’s performance across diverse problem instances. While global optimization generally requires high numbers of function evaluations, we demonstrate how restricted global optimizers still show better performance without requiring an exceeding amount of function evaluations.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a promising variational quantum algorithm for addressing NP hard combinatorial optimization problems. However, a significant limitation lies in optimizing its classical parameters, which is in itself an NP hard problem. To circumvent this obstacle, initialization heuristics, enhanced problem encodings and beneficial problem scalings have been proposed. While such strategies further improve QAOA's performance, their remaining problem is the sole utilization of local optimizers. We show that local optimization methods are inherently inadequate within the complex cost landscape of QAOA. Instead, global optimization techniques greatly improve QAOA's performance across diverse problem instances. While global optimization generally requires high numbers of function evaluations, we demonstrate how restricted global optimizers still show better performance without requiring an exceeding amount of function evaluations.
The transition from theoretical quantum computing to practical real-world applications heavily relies onhybrid quantum-classical architectures designed for NoisyIntermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Among these approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm(QAOA) is a prominent strategy for addressing complex combinatorial optimization challenges, such as the NP-hard MaxCut problem. Instead of performing the entire computationon a quantum processor, QAOA utilizes a quantum circuit toevaluate a parameterized cost function, whereas a classical optimizer refines the parameters iteratively. This study presentsa rigorous empirical evaluation comparing the performanceof QAOA against established classical solvers on small-scaleMax-Cut instances. All experiments were implemented andexecuted using Python (Qiskit Aer) on a state-vector simulator.Using Erdős–Rényi random graphs and regular graphs with4 to 20 nodes, we benchmark QAOA at depths p = 2 andp = 3 against simulated annealing, the Goemans–WilliamsonSDP-based algorithm, and a linear-time greedy heuristic. Ourexperimental results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA implementations exhibit severe performance degradation, prohibitive computational overhead (O(2^n) scaling), and low convergencerates compared to mature classical algorithms. At 20 nodes,QAOA (p = 2) achieves only a 0.467 approximation ratio versus0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, with a 210× runtime slowdownover greedy heuristics
Combinatorial Optimization problems play an important role in various domains such as logis- tics, life science or the financial sector. As their complexity in general grows exponentially with their problem size, finding the optimal solution classically becomes infeasible very fast. This raises the central question of whether quantum computers are in principle suitable for solving combinatorial optimization problems better and faster than classical computers. In order to find answers to that question, one needs to study quantum algorithms designed for those problems under ideal conditions (i.e., simulations, which are however limited due to exponential scaling) to investigate their potential, but one also needs real quantum hardware to test its viability and evaluate whether practical advantages are reasonable. In this regard, we consider variational quantum algorithms, especially the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) consisting of a problem and a mixer Hamiltonian with freely selectable parameters, originally proposed as variational hybrid ansatz with classical optimization. This algorithm structure of- fers flexible and relatively shallow circuits, which makes it suitable for current NISQ hardware. However, optimizing the variational circuit parameters can be an NP-hard problem at worst. In this thesis, we study different versions of QAOA, especially with a focus on limitations, perfor- mance and potential advantages opposite classical methods. The first part of the thesis concerns the investigation of various aspects regarding the imple- mentation of the variational QAOA protocol such as: the incorporation of a problem constraint either by adding a suitable penalty term of by choosing a suitable mixer (that restricts the search space), the scaling of the problem Hamiltonian in comparison to the mixer Hamiltonian, the choice of the initial values for the classical optimization of the circuit parameters, and finally the choice of the function to be minimized (i.e., CVaR vs. expectation value). We apply this proto- col to both the portfolio optimization and the feature selection and evaluate the performance. In order to improve QAOA, we consider the warm-start QAOA for different problem instances and analyze its improved performance with regard to involved quantum effects. For this purpose, we propose a classical pre-processing method and demonstrate that the warm-start results can be reproduced or even exceeded by this method. The second part addresses the issue that the standard variational form requires a high number of circuit parameters that have to be optimized at a sufficiently large depth, which is a major limitationforachievingpotentialscalingadvantagescomparedtoclassicalmethods. Toovercome this limitation, we investigate and further develop fixed schedules for QAOA, which only rely on two free parameters. We start with introducing the continuous adiabatic theorem as it motivates the form of QAOA and show its limitations, which we address by applying a discrete version of the theorem. With our findings, a new version of QAOA based on linear-ramps (LR-QAOA) is introduced and further developed. In order to derive suitable parameter values for this schedule, we propose a method based on extrapolation from smaller towards larger problem sizes. With our results obtained on a noiseless emulator, we evaluate the quantum runtime scaling and discuss whether a scaling advantage can be achieved compared to classical methods.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems.Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant.An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization.We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations.Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in O½polyðpÞ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 OðpÞ optimization runs to achieve similar performance.We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps.The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps.Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA.When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices.We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
In recent years, variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have gained popularity as they provide the hope of using NISQ devices to tackle hard combinatorial optimization problems. It is, however, known that at low depth, certain locality constraints of QAOA limit its performance. To go beyond these limitations, a non-local variant of QAOA, namely recursive QAOA (RQAOA), was proposed to improve the quality of approximate solutions. The RQAOA has been studied comparatively less than QAOA, and it is less understood, for instance, for what family of instances it may fail to provide high-quality solutions. However, as we are tackling NP-hard problems (specifically, the Ising spin model), it is expected that RQAOA does fail, raising the question of designing even better quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. In this spirit, we identify and analyze cases where (depth-1) RQAOA fails and, based on this, propose a reinforcement learning enhanced RQAOA variant (RL-RQAOA) that improves upon RQAOA. We show that the performance of RL-RQAOA improves over RQAOA: RL-RQAOA is strictly better on these identified instances where RQAOA underperforms and is similarly performing on instances where RQAOA is near-optimal. Our work exemplifies the potentially beneficial synergy between reinforcement learning and quantum (inspired) optimization in the design of new, even better heuristics for complex problems.