Benchmarking quantum annealing machines for solving combinatorial problems

Sovanmonynuth Heng, Dongmin Kim, Tae-Kyung Kim +1 more

A combinatorial optimization problem (COP) is the problem of finding the optimal solution in a finite set. When the size of the feasible solution set is large, the complexity of the problem increases, and it is not easy to solve in a reasonable time with the current classical computer technology. Quantum annealing (QA) is a method that replaces classical simulated annealing (SA) methods that do not solve these cases. Therefore, several attempts have been made to solve this problem using a special-purpose quantum annealer to which the QA method is applied. In this survey, we analyze recent studies that solve real-scale COPs using quantum annealers. Through this, we discuss how to reduce the size of the COP to be input to overcome the hardware limitations of the existing quantum annealer. Additionally, we demonstrated the applicability of quantum annealer to COP on a practical scale by comparing and analyzing the results of the classical simulated annealing (SA) and QA method from each study.

Vaibhaw Kumar, Gideon Bass, Casey Tomlin +1 more

Seongmin Kim, Sang-Woo Ahn, In‐Saeng Suh +3 more

Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.

E. Arvidsson

Amr Magdy

Qingguo Zeng, Xiaopeng Cui, Bowen Liu +3 more

Abstract Two classes of quantum-annealing-inspired-algorithms (QAIA), namely different variants of simulated coherent Ising machine and simulated bifurcation, have been proposed for efficiently solving combinatorial optimization problems recently. In order to certify the superiority of these algorithms, standardized comparisons among them and against other physics-based algorithms are necessary. In this work, for Max-Cut problems up to 20,000 nodes, we benchmark QAIA against quantum annealing and other physics-based algorithms. We found that ballistic simulated bifurcation excelled for chimera and small-scale graphs, achieving nearly a 50-fold reduction in time-to-solution compared to quantum annealing. For large-scale graphs, discrete simulated bifurcation achieves the lowest time-to-target and outperforms D-Wave Advantage system when tasked with finding the maximum cut value in pegasus graphs. Our results suggest that QAIA represents a promising means for solving combinatorial optimization problems in practice, and can act as a natural baseline for competing quantum algorithms.