Transitioning from classically to quantum secure key agreement protocols may require to exchange fundamental components, for example, exchanging Diffie-Hellman-like key exchange with a key encapsulation mechanism (KEM). Accordingly, the corresponding security proof can no longer rely on the Diffie-Hellman assumption, thus invalidating the security guarantees. As a consequence, the security properties have to be re-proven under a KEM-based security notion. We initiate the study of the LDACS key agreement protocol (Edition 01.01.00 from 25.04.2023), which is soon-to-be-standardized by the International Civil Aviation Organization. The protocol's cipher suite features Diffie-Hellman as well as a KEM-based key agreement protocol to provide post-quantum security. While the former results in an instantiation of an ISO key agreement inheriting all security properties, the security achieved by the latter is ambiguous. We formalize the computational security using the systematic notions of de Saint Guilhem, Fischlin and Warinshi (CSF '20), and prove the exact security that the KEM-based variant achieves in this model; primarily entity authentication, key secrecy and key authentication. To further strengthen our “pen-and-paper” findings, we model the protocol and its security guarantees using Tamarin, providing an automated proof of the security against a Dolev-Yao attacker.
Transitioning from classically to quantum secure key agreement protocols may require to exchange fundamental components, for example, exchanging Diffie-Hellman-like key exchange with a key encapsulation mechanism (KEM). Accordingly, the corresponding security proof can no longer rely on the Diffie-Hellman assumption, thus invalidating the security guarantees. As a consequence, the security properties have to be re-proven under a KEM-based security notion. We initiate the study of the LDACS key agreement protocol (Edition 01.01.00 from 25.04.2023), which is soon-to-be-standardized by the International Civil Aviation Organization. The protocol's cipher suite features Diffie-Hellman as well as a KEM-based key agreement protocol to provide post-quantum security. While the former results in an instantiation of an ISO key agreement inheriting all security properties, the security achieved by the latter is ambiguous. We formalize the computational security using the systematic notions of de Saint Guilhem, Fischlin and Warinshi (CSF '20), and prove the exact security that the KEM-based variant achieves in this model; primarily entity authentication, key secrecy and key authentication. To further strengthen our “pen-and-paper” findings, we model the protocol and its security guarantees using Tamarin, providing an automated proof of the security against a Dolev-Yao attacker.
ISO/IEC standardizes several chosen ciphertext-secure key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) schemes in ISO/IEC 18033-2. However, all ISO/IEC KEM schemes are not quantum resilient. In this paper, we introduce new isogeny-based KEM schemes (i.e., CSIDH-ECIES-KEM and CSIDH-PSEC-KEM) by modifying Diffie-Hellman-based KEM schemes in ISO/IEC standards. The main advantage of our schemes are compactness. The key size and the ciphertext overhead of our schemes are about five times smaller than these of SIKE-KEM which is submitted to NIST's post-quantum cryptosystems standardization.
The advent of quantum computing poses significant threats to classical public-key cryptographic systems such as RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography, necessitating quantum-safe migration paths for Internet of Things (IoT) communication. The Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman Over COSE (EDHOC) protocol provides lightweight authenticated key exchange for resource-constrained IoT devices but lacks quantum-safe security and formally verified implementations. This thesis introduces KEMEDHOC, a KEM-based, signature-free, post-quantum variant of EDHOC that achieves mutual authentication through optimized integration of Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs). Compared to the direct adaptation, KEMEDHOC reduces noticeably message size (by over \textbf{33\%}) and handshake time (by \textbf{15\%}), while maintaining comparable security levels. Formal verification, at design-level, using ProVerif confirms that KEMEDHOC preserve all core EDHOC security properties, including mutual authentication, confidentiality, and forward secrecy. Verified implementations (EDHOC* and KEMEDHOC*) developed in F* and Low* ensure functional correctness, memory safety, and timing constant-time behavior, down to verified C code through KaRaMel compiler. Overall, this thesis delivers the first end-to-end formally verified post-quantum variant of EDHOC, demonstrating that formal assurance and post-quantum security can be obtained efficiently in lightweight key exchange protocols.
TLS 1.3 is a crucial protocol for securing modern internet communications. To facilitate a smooth transition to post-quantum security, hybrid key exchange, which combines classical key exchange algorithms with post-quantum key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs), is proposed to enhance the security of the current TLS 1.3 handshake. However, existing drafts and implementations of hybrid key exchange for TLS 1.3 primarily rely on CCA-secure KEMs (i.e., secure against chosen-ciphertext attacks) based on the Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transform. The re-encryption step in their decapsulation algorithms not only introduces additional performance overhead but also raises the risk of side-channel attacks. Although Huguenin-Dumittan and Vaudenay (Eurocrypt 2022) and Zhou et al. (Asiacrypt 2024) demonstrated that the weaker CPA-secure KEMs (i.e., secure against chosen-plaintext attacks) suffice for constructing a secure TLS 1.3 handshake, their analyses were limited to single-KEM settings and did not consider the hybrid key exchange scenario. This work challenges the necessity of CCA security by proving that CPA-secure KEMs are sufficient for the TLS 1.3 handshake even in the hybrid key exchange setting. We provide the first formal security proofs for this claim, covering both the classical random oracle model (ROM) and the quantum random oracle model (QROM), thereby ensuring security against quantum adversaries. To validate the practical benefits, we conduct an extensive performance evaluation based on the latest OpenSSL implementation. Our results show that using CPA-secure KEMs yields up to 44.8% performance improvement at the key exchange layer and up to approximately 9% acceleration for the full TLS 1.3 handshake. Beyond performance gains, this approach reduces the codebase's attack surface by eliminating the re-encryption step, thereby mitigating a class of side-channel vulnerabilities. Our work positions CPA-secure KEMs as a secure, efficient, and practical alternative for standardizing and deploying post-quantum TLS 1.3 even with hybrid key exchange.
Key exchange protocols, first introduced by Diffie and Hellman in 1976, are one of the most widely-deployed cryptographic protocols. They allow two parties, that have never interacted before, to establish shared secrets. These shared cryptographic keys may subsequently be used to establish a secure communication channel. Use cases include the classic client-server setting that is for example at play when browsing the internet, but also chats via end-to-end-encrypted instant messaging applications. Security-wise, we generally demand of key exchange protocols to achieve key secrecy and authentication. While, informally, authentication ensures that the communicating parties have confidence in the identity of their peers, key secrecy ensures that any shared cryptographic key that is established via the key exchange protocol is only known to the participants in the protocol and can be used securely in cryptographic protocols, i.e., is sufficiently random. In 1993, Bellare and Rogaway gave a first formalization of key exchange protocol security that captures these properties with respect to powerful adversaries with full control over the network. Their model constitutes the basis of the many subsequent treatments of authenticated key exchange security, including the models presented in this thesis. The common methodological approach underlying all of these formalizations is the provable security paradigm, which has become a standard tool in assessing the security of cryptographic protocols and primitives. So-called security models specify the expected security guarantees of the scheme in question with regards to a well-defined class of adversaries. Proofs that validate these security claims do so by reducing the security of the overall scheme to the security of the underlying cryptographic primitives and hardness assumptions. However, advances in computational power and more sophisticated cryptanalytic capabilities often render exactly these components insecure. Especially the advent of quantum computers will have a devastating effect on much of today's public key cryptography. This is especially true for key exchange protocols since they rely crucially on public-key algorithms. In this thesis, our focus in future-proofing key exchange protocols is two-fold. First, we focus on extending security models for key exchange protocols to capture the (un)expected break of cryptographic primitives and hardness assumptions. The aim is to gain assurances with respect to future adversaries and to investigate the effects of primitive failures on key exchange protocols. More specifically, we explore how key exchange protocols can be safely transitioned to new, post-quantum secure algorithms with hybrid techniques. Hybrids combine classical and post-quantum algorithms such that the overall key agreement scheme remains secure as long as one of the two base schemes remains secure. For this, we introduce security notions for key encapsulation mechanisms that account for adversaries with varying levels of quantum capabilities and present three new constructions for hybrid key encapsulation mechanisms. Our hybrid designs are practice-inspired and for example capture draft proposals for hybrid modes in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol, which is one of the most widely-deployed cryptographic protocols that enables key agreement. Furthermore, our notion of breakdown resilience for key exchange protocols allows to gauge the security of past session keys in the event of a failure of a cryptographic component in the key exchange. We exercise our model on variants of the post-quantum secure key exchange protocol NewHope by Alkim et al. Thereby, we confirm the intuition that, in order to guard against adversaries that only have access to quantum computing power in the (more distant) future, it is sufficient to use classically-secure authentication mechanisms alongside post-quantum key agreement to achieve authenticated key exchange. As with any mathematical statement, theorems in the provable security paradigm are only as valid as the underlying assumptions. A careful consideration of any newly made assumption is thus essential to ensure the meaningfulness of the statement itself and make the assumption a viable tool for future analyses. Thus, secondly, we systematically classify the PRF-ODH assumption, a complexity-theoretic hardness assumption that has been used in key exchange security analyses of such prominent protocols as TLS, Signal, and Wireguard. In particular, we give a unified, parametrized definition of the assumption encompassing different variants that are present in the literature. We relate the resulting parametrized notions in terms of their strength and show where these assumptions fit in the collection of well-understood related hardness assumptions. We finally sketch our result on the impossibility of instantiating this assumption in the standard model, thereby disposing of the uncertainty in the community whether PRF-ODH is in fact a standard model assumption, i.e., removes the usage of some idealized assumptions in key exchange protocol proofs.
The Secure Shell (SSH) protocol is one of the first security protocols on the Internet to upgrade itself to resist attacks against future quantum computers, with the default adoption of the “quantum (otherwise, classically)” secure hybrid key exchange in OpenSSH from April 2022. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive security analysis of this quantum-resistant version of SSH in the literature: related works either focus on the hybrid key exchange in isolation and do not consider security of the overall protocol, or analyze the protocol in security models which are not appropriate for SSH, especially in the “post-quantum” setting. In this paper, we remedy the state of affairs by providing a thorough post-quantum cryptographic analysis of SSH. We follow a “top-down” approach wherein we first prove security of SSH in a more appropriate model, namely, our post-quantum extension of the so-called authenticated and confidential channel establishment (ACCE) protocol security model; our extension which captures “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks could be of independent interest. Then we establish the cryptographic properties of SSH's underlying primitives, as concretely instantiated in practice, based on our protocol-level ACCE security analysis: for example, we prove relevant cryptographic properties of “Streamlined NTRU Prime”, a key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) which is used in recent versions of OpenSSH and TinySSH, in the quantum random oracle model, and address open problems related to its analysis in the literature. Notably, our ACCE security analysis of post-quantum SSH relies on the weaker notion of IND-CPA security of the ephemeral KEMs used in the hybrid key exchange. This is in contrast to prior works which rely on the stronger assumption of IND-CCA secure ephemeral KEMs. Hence we conclude the paper with a discussion on potentially replacing IND-CCA secure KEMs in current post-quantum implementations of SSH with simpler and faster IND-CPA secure counterparts, and also provide the corresponding benchmarks.
With the rapid advancement of quantum computing, classical cryptographic protocols face an increasing risk of being broken. The Post-Quantum OpenPGP (PQ OpenPGP) protocol is an extension of the OpenPGP standard that incorporates hybrid cryptography by combining a classical key exchange and a post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism. This design aims to provide long-term security even in the presence of adversaries equipped with quantum computational capabilities and ensures backward compatibility while transitioning safely to the quantum era. This article presents a formal specification and verification of the PQ OpenPGP protocol using the algebraic specification language CafeOBJ. Our specification captures key aspects of the protocol, including hybrid key encapsulation using post-quantum Module-Lattice Key Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM) and classical Elliptic Curve Diffie–Hellman (ECDH)-KEM, dual digital signatures using post-quantum Module-Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA) and classical Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA). To model adversarial behavior, we extend the standard Dolev-Yao intruder model, widely used in the analysis of security protocols, by incorporating quantum-enabled capabilities. Under our threat model, the intruder not only has full control over the network, as in the traditional Dolev-Yao setting, but is also capable of breaking classical public-key cryptographic primitives and compromising sensitive information, reflecting the realistic power of large-scale quantum computers. We successfully verify that the PQ OpenPGP protocol satisfies three essential security properties: secrecy of the session key, forward secrecy, and authenticity. The proofs are supported by ten auxiliary lemmas. Given the formal specification, security properties, and conjecture lemmas, the Invariant Proof Score Generator (IPSG) tool automatically generates proof scores to facilitate verification. This work contributes to the growing research on formal verification in post-quantum cryptographic protocols.