Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthesis lectures on engineering, science, and technology

Quantization of a Free Particle in N-Dimensional Space

Horst R. Beyer

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-49078-1_1

Related papers

Coherent state quantization of time of arrival functions of confined and free particles

Daisy A. Romeo, Job A. Nable

This work presents coherent state quantization f↦∫f(x)|X〉〈X|dμ(X) applied to the classical time of arrival functions of the form T(q,p)=-μqp, expressed in different coordinate systems, corresponding to phase spaces of the p confined and free particle, respectively. The most important ingredient in this technique is the coherent state. Two ways of constructing coherent states will be adopted:via unitary group representations and via superposition method, applied to time of arrival function of one – dimensional confined and free particles.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

ON THE QUANTIZATION OF A SYSTEM OF TWO PARTICLES

C. Piron

•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations

Quantization in the functional theory of particles

Jean-Louis Destouches

Il Nuovo Cimento•Mar 1, 1956•1 citation

EQUIVALENCE OF STOCHASTIC, KLAUDER AND GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

K. Hajra, P. Bandyopadhyay

The relativistic generalization of stochastic quantization helps us to introduce a stochastic-phase-space formulation when a relativistic quantum particle appears as a stochastically extended one. The nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is obtained in the sharp point limit. This also helps us to introduce a gauge-theoretical extension of a relativistic quantum particle when for a fermion the group structure of the gauge field is SU(2). The sharp point limit is obtained when we have a minimal contribution of the residual gauge field retained in the limiting procedure. This is shown to be equivalent to the geometrical approach to the phase-space quantization introduced by Klauder if it is interpreted in terms of a universal magnetic field acting on a free particle moving in a higher-dimensional configuration space when quantization corresponds to freezing the particle to its first Landau level. The geometric quantization then appears as a natural consequence of these two formalisms, since the Hermitian line bundle introduced there finds a physical meaning in terms of the inherent gauge field in stochastic-phase-space formulation or in the interaction with the magnetic field in Klauder quantization.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Mar 10, 1992•6 citations

Systems of Particles and Second Quantization

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Free Particle Eigenfunctions of Schrodinger Equation with Quantized Space-time

Manjit Bhatia, P. Narayana Swamy

It is well-known that the coordinate as a continuous variable, consisting of a set of all points between 0 and $L$ contradicts the observability of measurement. In other words there might exist a fundamental length in nature, such as the Planck length $λ_P$, so that it is not possible to measure a position coordinate with accuracy smaller than this fundamental length. It is therefore necessary to investigate the formulation of quantum mechanics using only discrete variables as coordinates. To investigate all of quantum mechanics or any branch of physics from this approach is of course a daunting task and thus it is worthwhile to consider a specific simple problem in order to formulate the basic ideas. In this note we compare the solutions of Schrodinger equation for one-dimensional free particle under the usual space-time continuum with those that are obtained when space-time is assumed to be quantized using a simple model. For this purpose, we replace the derivatives occurring in Schrodinger equation with the corresponding discrete derivatives. We compute the probability density (and the probability current) under the two scenarios; they turn out to be quite different in the two cases. We also obtain the operator identity for the commutator $[p,x]^q$ under the assumption of quantized space-time and contrast it with the usual commutator $[p,x]$.

arXiv:0910.0825•Oct 5, 2009•1 citation
This work presents coherent state quantization f↦∫f(x)|X〉〈X|dμ(X) applied to the classical time of arrival functions of the form T(q,p)=-μqp, expressed in different coordinate systems, corresponding to phase spaces of the p confined and free particle, respectively. The most important ingredient in this technique is the coherent state. Two ways of constructing coherent states will be adopted:via unitary group representations and via superposition method, applied to time of arrival function of one – dimensional confined and free particles.
The relativistic generalization of stochastic quantization helps us to introduce a stochastic-phase-space formulation when a relativistic quantum particle appears as a stochastically extended one. The nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is obtained in the sharp point limit. This also helps us to introduce a gauge-theoretical extension of a relativistic quantum particle when for a fermion the group structure of the gauge field is SU(2). The sharp point limit is obtained when we have a minimal contribution of the residual gauge field retained in the limiting procedure. This is shown to be equivalent to the geometrical approach to the phase-space quantization introduced by Klauder if it is interpreted in terms of a universal magnetic field acting on a free particle moving in a higher-dimensional configuration space when quantization corresponds to freezing the particle to its first Landau level. The geometric quantization then appears as a natural consequence of these two formalisms, since the Hermitian line bundle introduced there finds a physical meaning in terms of the inherent gauge field in stochastic-phase-space formulation or in the interaction with the magnetic field in Klauder quantization.
It is well-known that the coordinate as a continuous variable, consisting of a set of all points between 0 and LLL contradicts the observability of measurement. In other words there might exist a fundamental length in nature, such as the Planck length λPλ_PλP​, so that it is not possible to measure a position coordinate with accuracy smaller than this fundamental length. It is therefore necessary to investigate the formulation of quantum mechanics using only discrete variables as coordinates. To investigate all of quantum mechanics or any branch of physics from this approach is of course a daunting task and thus it is worthwhile to consider a specific simple problem in order to formulate the basic ideas. In this note we compare the solutions of Schrodinger equation for one-dimensional free particle under the usual space-time continuum with those that are obtained when space-time is assumed to be quantized using a simple model. For this purpose, we replace the derivatives occurring in Schrodinger equation with the corresponding discrete derivatives. We compute the probability density (and the probability current) under the two scenarios; they turn out to be quite different in the two cases. We also obtain the operator identity for the commutator [p,x]q[p,x]^q[p,x]q under the assumption of quantized space-time and contrast it with the usual commutator [p,x][p,x][p,x].