Quantum computing (QC) demonstrates substantial theoretical promise in addressing classically intractable problems. Recent investments and advancements across QC system stacks, including hardware, software, and algorithms, underscore a pivotal shift from theoretical exploration to the practical realization of applications. Despite this progress, the prevailing emphasis has predominantly centered on performance enhancement, often overlooking security considerations. In response to this gap, our article presents a comprehensive tutorial and survey aimed at identifying and categorizing vulnerabilities inherent in quantum computing systems. Beginning with an overview encompassing essential principles, ecosystem components, and unique attributes in the quantum computing system stack, we also provide a summary of development resources to facilitate efficient initiation in this domain. Building on this foundational knowledge, we introduce a taxonomy of QC security organized by victim layer and security attack objectives. Utilizing this taxonomy as a guiding framework, the article delivers an extensive survey of the latest advancements in QC security, with the overarching goal of equipping the reader with a comprehensive understanding of quantum computing system principles and an informed awareness of diverse and dynamic QC security threats. The intention is to benefit both industry stakeholders and research communities, ultimately aiming to proactively identify and mitigate security concerns within QC systems, thereby establishing a robust foundation for secure quantum computing environments.
Quantum computing (QC) demonstrates substantial theoretical promise in addressing classically intractable problems. Recent investments and advancements across QC system stacks, including hardware, software, and algorithms, underscore a pivotal shift from theoretical exploration to the practical realization of applications. Despite this progress, the prevailing emphasis has predominantly centered on performance enhancement, often overlooking security considerations. In response to this gap, our article presents a comprehensive tutorial and survey aimed at identifying and categorizing vulnerabilities inherent in quantum computing systems. Beginning with an overview encompassing essential principles, ecosystem components, and unique attributes in the quantum computing system stack, we also provide a summary of development resources to facilitate efficient initiation in this domain. Building on this foundational knowledge, we introduce a taxonomy of QC security organized by victim layer and security attack objectives. Utilizing this taxonomy as a guiding framework, the article delivers an extensive survey of the latest advancements in QC security, with the overarching goal of equipping the reader with a comprehensive understanding of quantum computing system principles and an informed awareness of diverse and dynamic QC security threats. The intention is to benefit both industry stakeholders and research communities, ultimately aiming to proactively identify and mitigate security concerns within QC systems, thereby establishing a robust foundation for secure quantum computing environments.
Quantum computing (QC) is an emerging paradigm with the potential to transform numerous application domains by addressing classically intractable problems. However, its growing presence in cyberspace has introduced new security and privacy challenges. Similar to classical computing systems, the QC stack including software and hardware relies extensively on third parties, many of which are emerging and trust-seeking or less-trusted. This stack often contains sensitive intellectual property (IP) that demands protection. Unique features of quantum systems can enable classical-style attacks: for instance, crosstalk in multitenant settings can facilitate fault-injection attacks, while malicious calibration services can misreport error rates or miscalibrate qubits to induce denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. Given the high cost and limited availability of likely trustworthy quantum hardware, users may be enticed to explore emerging and trust-seeking but cheaper and readily available quantum hardware, which can enable the stealth of IP and tampering of quantum programs and/or computation outcomes. Similarly, emerging compilation services may compromise circuit confidentiality or insert Trojans. Despite the strategic significance of QC and its potential to process sensitive information, its security and privacy concerns remain underexplored. This article presents a comprehensive overview of QC fundamentals, key vulnerabilities, recent attack vectors, and corresponding defenses, and concludes with directions for future research to strengthen the quantum security community.
Abstract Quantum computing promises unprecedented computational power, posing fundamental threats and offering novel solutions to modern cryptography and cybersecurity. This survey paper reviews the rapidly evolving landscape of quantum-resistant and quantum-native security protocols. By analyzing foundational computational security models and the unique vulnerabilities introduced by quantum algorithms, this work proposes a structured evaluation framework for assessing the robustness of cryptographic systems. Ultimately, this survey highlights the critical transition from classical cryptographic infrastructures to quantum-secure paradigms, ensuring data confidentiality and integrity in the post-quantum era. Keywords: Quantum Computing, Security Protocol, Vulnerabilities 1.Introduction The emergence of quantum computing represents a paradigm shift in both computational physics and information technology. Quantum algorithms, particularly Shor's and Grover's algorithms, inherently challenge the mathematical foundations of classical public-key cryptography. As a result, securing communication channels against quantum-empowered adversaries has become an urgent priority for global infrastructure and national security. The motivation for this survey stems from the immediate need to bridge the gap between theoretical quantum mechanics and applied cybersecurity, ensuring that secure communications can withstand the computational leaps expected in the next decade. The core problem addressed in this paper is the comprehensive evaluation of security protocols under the threat model of a fully scalable quantum computer. The scope encompasses both post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) protocols and inherently quantum protocols, such as those relying on physical quantum states for key distribution. Existing classical approaches are insufficient for two main reasons. First, classical computational security models often rely on mathematical hardness assumptions (like integer factorization) that are rapidly undermined by theoretical quantum algorithms. Second, current software tools for designing secure classical protocols fail to account for quantum state phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, rendering classical verification methods inadequate for quantum threat models. To address these structural challenges, this paper presents the following contributions: We provide a comprehensive taxonomy of vulnerabilities in both classical and quantum security protocols, mapping specific algorithmic advantages to protocol failure points. We propose a structured, multi-module framework for simulating, attacking, and verifying the security of hybrid quantum-classical cryptographic architectures. 2.Foundations of Classical Protocol Analysis The rigorous analysis of security protocols has traditionally relied on well-defined computational and symbolic models (Toorani, 2016). Researchers have extensively mapped out the taxonomy of attacks on authenticated key exchange (AKE) protocols and password-authenticated key exchange (PAKE) systems, establishing the mathematical groundwork for secure communication. The core idea of these foundational works is to establish provable security bounds that distinguish between information-theoretic and computational security. While this traditional paradigm offers strong mathematical guarantees against classical adversaries, its primary weakness is the failure to incorporate quantum attack vectors into the adversary's capability profile. Our work builds upon these classical models by explicitly injecting quantum algorithmic capabilities into standard protocol verification routines. 2.1.Quantum Algorithm Development and Simulation A significant body of literature focuses on the theoretical development and computational simulation of quantum algorithms capable of compromising or enhancing network security. Academic overviews have formalized algorithms like Grover's and Shor's, demonstrating their theoretical efficiency over classical counterparts in breaking cryptographic primitives. Furthermore, researchers have developed advanced design automation tools, such as decision diagrams, to simulate and verify complex quantum circuits. The strength of these simulation tools lies in their ability to model complex quantum states without requiring expensive physical hardware. However, a notable weakness is that they often abstract away the physical noise and hardware constraints that exist in real-world cryptographic deployments. This survey contextualizes these simulation techniques specifically within the framework of adversarial security testing, bridging theoretical algorithms with practical protocol defense. 3.Physical Implementations and Hardware Considerations Beyond algorithmic theory, the physical realization of quantum states directly impacts the practical security of any quantum protocol. Research into cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) has demonstrated the complete mathematical construction of fundamental quantum gates, such as the controlled-controlled NOT gate, operating in the weak coupling regime (Fujii et al., 2005). Additionally, methods like Quantum Computed Moments (QCM) address the hardware constraints and noise typical of Near-Term Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, estimating ground state properties even with suboptimal trial states. The strength of this hardware-focused research is its realism regarding current technological limits; however, it often lacks a direct bridge to high-level network protocol verification. Compared to these purely physical studies, our survey integrates physical noise models into a generalized, software-driven protocol verification framework. 4.Approach To systematically evaluate quantum computing security protocols, we propose a structured Quantum Protocol Verification Framework (QPVF). The first module is the "Threat Modeling Engine," which defines the adversary's capabilities, ranging from classical data interception to full quantum memory manipulation. The second module is the "Quantum Circuit Synthesizer," which leverages decision diagram-based tools to translate high-level cryptographic operations into verifiable quantum circuits. The final module is the "Vulnerability Analyzer," which subjects the synthesized circuits to simulated quantum attacks, effectively distinguishing between idealized computational security and realistic hardware-constrained security. This modular pipeline allows security engineers to isolate specific vulnerabilities at both the abstract algorithmic layer and the simulated physical implementation layer. A key design choice in the QPVF is the utilization of decision diagrams for circuit simulation. This choice is predicated on the fact that decision diagrams efficiently handle the exponential state space of quantum systems during complex verification tasks (Wille et al., 2021). Furthermore, our framework explicitly incorporates noise models derived from current NISQ hardware limitations, ensuring that the security evaluation reflects realistic physical constraints rather than purely idealized environments (Vallury & Hollenberg, 2023). To evaluate this framework, we propose a hypothetical benchmarking plan using an artificially generated dataset of 10,000 hybrid quantum-classical cryptographic key exchanges. We will measure the success rate of simulated Grover-based brute-force attacks against varying key sizes and simulated environmental noise levels. This evaluation will compare the theoretical vulnerability threshold of a protocol against the practical threshold observed when quantum noise severely degrades the adversary's computational capabilities. The operational flow of the QPVF is designed to provide end-to-end security verification for next-generation networks. It bridges the critical gap between abstract protocol design and simulated hardware execution. The methodology can be summarized by the following numbered pipeline: Protocol Ingestion: The classical or quantum protocol is parsed into a standardized symbolic representation. Adversary Assignment: The user assigns a precise computational profile, selecting between traditional classical algorithms or advanced quantum capabilities. Circuit Generation: Protocol steps are mapped to equivalent quantum decision diagrams for scalable software simulation. Execution & Attack: Simulated quantum algorithms are executed against the mapped circuits to test for cryptographic resilience. Output Generation: The system outputs a vulnerability score and highlights specific failure points caused by either algorithmic weaknesses or simulated hardware noise. 5.Discussion The transition to quantum-secure protocols carries profound practical implications for global information infrastructure and enterprise deployment. Deploying these advanced protocols requires immense updates to existing software toolkits, as current digital systems are not fundamentally designed to handle the complexity of quantum states. Furthermore, organizations must consider the massive educational and workforce development efforts needed to train software engineers in quantum cryptography, a requirement already highlighted by international hackathons and educational initiatives. Integrating quantum-resistant protocols into complex domains like high-energy physics networks or global banking systems will require bridging the gap between theoretical quantum mechanics and applied computer engineering. Consequently, practical deployment must occur in hybrid phases, maintaining classical cryptographic wrappers while dedicated quantum infrastructure matures. Despite the robust theoretical design of proposed quantum security frameworks, several limitations and failure modes persist in practical applications. First, physical implementation attacks, such as side-channel attacks on the lasers and cavities used in physical quantum gates can bypass theoretical software security guarant
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative computing paradigm capable of solving problems that remain computationally infeasible for classical systems; however, its rapid advancement also introduces significant security, privacy, and reliability concerns. In this context, this survey presents a comprehensive review of security challenges and mitigation strategies associated with quantum computing, focusing on security issues in quantum computers, security threats caused by quantum computers, and security mechanisms developed for quantum systems. The paper examines vulnerabilities in quantum hardware and software, the impact of quantum computing on existing cryptographic infrastructures and cybersecurity mechanisms, and the development of quantum-resilient solutions such as post-quantum cryptography, quantum-safe communication protocols, quantum intrusion detection systems, and quantum-aware software engineering techniques. In addition, the survey discusses emerging applications of quantum technologies in cybersecurity domains, including malware detection, network intrusion detection, Internet of Things (IoT) security, and secure communication systems. Furthermore, the paper analyzes existing quantum error mitigation and fault-tolerance approaches designed to improve the robustness and trustworthiness of quantum computation under realistic noisy conditions. By consolidating recent advances, open research challenges, and future directions, this survey provides a structured overview of the evolving intersection between quantum computing and cybersecurity, while serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners working toward secure, resilient, and quantum-ready computing infrastructures.
Quantum computers pose a significant threat to blockchain technology’s security, which heavily relies on public-key cryptography and hash functions. The cryptographic algorithms used in blockchains, based on large odd prime numbers and discrete logarithms, can be easily compromised by quantum computing algorithms like Shor’s algorithm and its future qubit variations. This survey paper comprehensively examines the impact of quantum computers on blockchain security and explores potential mitigation strategies. We begin by surveying the existing literature on blockchains and quantum computing, providing insights into the current state of research. We then present an overview of blockchain, highlighting its key components and functionalities. We delve into the preliminaries and key definitions of quantum computing, establishing a foundation for understanding the implications on blockchain security. The application of blockchains in cybersecurity is explored, considering their strengths and vulnerabilities in light of evolving quantum computing capabilities. The survey focuses on the quantum security of blockchain’s fundamental building blocks, including digital signatures, hash functions, consensus algorithms, and smart contracts. We analyze the vulnerabilities introduced by quantum computers and discuss potential countermeasures and enhancements to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of blockchain systems. Furthermore, we investigate the quantum attack surface of blockchains, identifying potential avenues for exploiting quantum computing to strengthen existing attacks. We emphasize the need for developing quantum-resistant defenses and explore solutions for mitigating the threat of quantum computers to blockchains, including the adoption of quantum and post-quantum blockchain architectures. By examining vulnerabilities and discussing mitigation strategies, we aim to guide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in developing robust and secure blockchain systems capable of withstanding advancements in quantum computing technology.
Quantum computers pose a significant threat to blockchain technology's security, which heavily relies on public-key cryptography and hash functions. The cryptographic algorithms used in blockchains, based on large odd prime numbers and discrete logarithms, can be easily compromised by quantum computing algorithms like Shor's algorithm and its future qubit variations. This survey paper comprehensively examines the impact of quantum computers on blockchain security and explores potential mitigation strategies. We begin by surveying the existing literature on blockchains and quantum computing, providing insights into the current state of research. We then present an overview of blockchain, highlighting its key components and functionalities. We delve into the preliminaries and key definitions of quantum computing, establishing a foundation for understanding the implications on blockchain security. The application of blockchains in cybersecurity is explored, considering their strengths and vulnerabilities in light of evolving quantum computing capabilities. The survey focuses on the quantum security of blockchain's fundamental building blocks, including digital signatures, hash functions, consensus algorithms, and smart contracts. We analyze the vulnerabilities introduced by quantum computers and discuss potential countermeasures and enhancements to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of blockchain systems. Furthermore, we investigate the quantum attack surface of blockchains, identifying potential avenues for exploiting quantum computing to strengthen existing attacks. We emphasize the need for developing quantum-resistant defenses and explore solutions for mitigating the threat of quantum computers to blockchains, including the adoption of quantum and post-quantum blockchain architectures. By examining vulnerabilities and discussing mitigation strategies, we aim to guide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in developing robust and secure blockchain systems capable of withstanding advancements in quantum computing technology.
Abstract Quantum computing (QC) is an emerging paradigm with the potential to offer significant computational advantage over conventional classical computing by exploiting quantum‐mechanical principles such as entanglement and superposition. It is anticipated that this computational advantage of QC will help to solve many complex and computationally intractable problems in several application domains such as drug design, data science, clean energy, finance, industrial chemical development, secure communications, and quantum chemistry. In recent years, tremendous progress in both quantum hardware development and quantum software/algorithm has brought QC much closer to reality. Indeed, the demonstration of quantum supremacy marks a significant milestone in the Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) era—the next logical step being the quantum advantage whereby quantum computers solve a real‐world problem much more efficiently than classical computing. As the quantum devices are expected to steadily scale up in the next few years, quantum decoherence and qubit interconnectivity are two of the major challenges to achieve quantum advantage in the NISQ era. QC is a highly topical and fast‐moving field of research with significant ongoing progress in all facets. A systematic review of the existing literature on QC will be invaluable to understand the state‐of‐the‐art of this emerging field and identify open challenges for the QC community to address in the coming years. This article presents a comprehensive review of QC literature and proposes taxonomy of QC. The proposed taxonomy is used to map various related studies to identify the research gaps. A detailed overview of quantum software tools and technologies, post‐quantum cryptography, and quantum computer hardware development captures the current state‐of‐the‐art in the respective areas. The article identifies and highlights various open challenges and promising future directions for research and innovation in QC.