The classical homotopy optimization approach has the potential to deal with highly nonlinear landscapes, such as the energy landscape of quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) problems. Following this motivation, we introduce Hamiltonian-oriented homotopy QAOA (HOHo-QAOA), a heuristic method for combinatorial optimization using QAOA, based on classical homotopy optimization. The method consists of a homotopy map that produces an optimization problem for each value of the interpolating parameter. Therefore, HOHo-QAOA decomposes the optimization of QAOA into several loops, each using a mixture of the mixer and the objective Hamiltonian for cost function evaluation. Furthermore, we conclude that the HOHo-QAOA improves the search for low-energy states in the nonlinear energy landscape and outperforms other variants of QAOA.
The classical homotopy optimization approach has the potential to deal with highly nonlinear landscapes, such as the energy landscape of quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) problems. Following this motivation, we introduce Hamiltonian-oriented homotopy QAOA (HOHo-QAOA), a heuristic method for combinatorial optimization using QAOA, based on classical homotopy optimization. The method consists of a homotopy map that produces an optimization problem for each value of the interpolating parameter. Therefore, HOHo-QAOA decomposes the optimization of QAOA into several loops, each using a mixture of the mixer and the objective Hamiltonian for cost function evaluation. Furthermore, we conclude that the HOHo-QAOA improves the search for low-energy states in the nonlinear energy landscape and outperforms other variants of QAOA.
The classical homotopy optimization approach has the potential to deal with highly nonlinear landscape, such as the energy landscape of QAOA problems. Following this motivation, we introduce Hamiltonian-Oriented Homotopy QAOA (HOHo-QAOA), that is a heuristic method for combinatorial optimization using QAOA, based on classical homotopy optimization. The method consists of a homotopy map that produces an optimization problem for each value of interpolating parameter. Therefore, HOHo-QAOA decomposes the optimization of QAOA into several loops, each using a mixture of the mixer and the objective Hamiltonian for cost function evaluation. Furthermore, we conclude that the HOHo-QAOA improves the search for low energy states in the nonlinear energy landscape and outperforms other variants of QAOA.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a heuristic for unconstrained combinatorial optimization.It prepares a statefrom which one would like to sample good solutions with high probability.QAOA is specified by • the initial state + 𝑛 , the uniform superposition over all basis states,• a Cost Hamiltonian 𝐻 𝐶 , used to phase basis states proportional to their cost 𝐶 𝑥 : 𝑥 ↦ 𝑒 -𝑖𝛾𝐶(𝑥) |𝑥⟩ and to evaluate the expectation value of the QAOA state, ⟨𝜷, 𝜸 𝐻 𝐶 𝜷, 𝜸⟩,• a Transverse Field Mixer ∑ 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑋 𝑖 , used to interfere states in order to boost good solutions,• 𝑝 rounds with individual angle parameters 𝛽 1 , … , 𝛽 𝑝 , 𝛾 1 , … , 𝛾 𝑝 .
Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems on quantum computers. However, in many cases QAOA requires computationally intensive parameter optimization. The challenge of parameter optimization is particularly acute in the case of weighted problems, for which the eigenvalues of the phase operator are non-integer and the QAOA energy landscape is not periodic. In this work, we develop parameter setting heuristics for QAOA applied to a general class of weighted problems. First, we derive optimal parameters for QAOA with depth p=1 applied to the weighted MaxCut problem under different assumptions on the weights. In particular, we rigorously prove the conventional wisdom that in the average case the first local optimum near zero gives globally-optimal QAOA parameters. Second, for p≥1 we prove that the QAOA energy landscape for weighted MaxCut approaches that for the unweighted case under a simple rescaling of parameters. Therefore, we can use parameters previously obtained for unweighted MaxCut for weighted problems. Finally, we prove that for p=1 the QAOA objective sharply concentrates around its expectation, which means that our parameter setting rules hold with high probability for a random weighted instance. We numerically validate this approach on general weighted graphs and show that on average the QAOA energy with the proposed fixed parameters is only 1.1 percentage points away from that with optimized parameters. Third, we propose a general heuristic rescaling scheme inspired by the analytical results for weighted MaxCut and demonstrate its effectiveness using QAOA with the XY Hamming-weight-preserving mixer applied to the portfolio optimization problem. Our heuristic improves the convergence of local optimizers, reducing the number of iterations by 7.4x on average.
The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) is a widely studied quantum-classical iterative heuristic for combinatorial optimisation. While QAOA targets problems in complexity class NP, the classical optimisation procedure required in every iteration is itself known to be NP-hard. Still, advantage over classical approaches is suspected for certain scenarios, but nature and origin of its computational power are not yet satisfactorily understood. By introducing means of efficiently and accurately approximating the QAOA optimisation landscape from solution space structures, we derive a new algorithmic variant of unit-depth QAOA for two-level Hamiltonians (including all problems in NP): Instead of performing an iterative quantum-classical computation for each input instance, our non-iterative method is based on a quantum circuit that is instance-independent, but problem-specific. It matches or outperforms unit-depth QAOA for key combinatorial problems, despite reduced computational effort. Our approach is based on proving a long-standing conjecture regarding instance-independent structures in QAOA. By ensuring generality, we link existing empirical observations on QAOA parameter clustering to established approaches in theoretical computer science, and provide a sound foundation for understanding the link between structural properties of solution spaces and quantum optimisation.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is one of the promising near-term algorithms designed to find approximate solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. The algorithm prepares a parametrized state that is aimed to maximize the expectation value of the objective function of the problem. The circuit for QAOA consists of p layers, and it depends on 2p parameters, the determination of which can be carried out using a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) subroutine. This is a variational approach for finding optimal parameters, where the quantum state is prepared with a quantum computer, and a classical computer is used for calculating the corresponding objective function value and performing an outer loop optimization routine in order to find optimal parameters. Earlier work on the algorithm has shown that QAOA is closely related to the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm, which results in noticeable patterns in the optimal parameters. To this purpose, two methods, INTERP and FOURIER, were proposed to exploit this structure by Zhou et al. (2018). In this thesis, I extend upon these results by examining the effectiveness of one of their methods, the INTERP method, on the Max-Cut problem from graph theory. The performance of QAOA using this method was studied on several classes of graphs and benchmarked against the currently best-known classical algorithm Goemans-Williamson, which achieves an approximation ratio of ρ ≈ 0.878 on arbitrary graphs. The classes of graphs examined include cyclic, weighted and unweighted 3-regular, and Erdős–Rényi graphs with edge probabilities of 0.5 and 0.75 and graph sizes ranging from 4 to 16. Moreover, it was investigated if the INTERP method offers an advantage compared to random initialization of parameters and whether or not the method is polynomial in p. It was found that different graph classes lead to similar but different parameter patterns. Furthermore, the performance of QAOA using the INTERP method was dependent on the graph class considered. For the small graphs investigated it was found that QAOA outperforms Goemans-Williamson on ER-0.50, ER-0.75 and weighted 3-regular graphs from p=7 and beyond with respect to how well the expectation of the objective function approximates the optimal value, while for unweighted 3-regular graphs p=6 suffices. However, the calculation of the parameters is costly and requires a number of function evaluations that is on the order of the number of possible bipartitions of small graph with sizes n ≤ 16. Moreover, the numerical results suggested that indeed the method is polynomial in p advocating that the algorithm might be a strong alternative to Goemans-Williamson for large graph sizes, once hardware allows it.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising variational quantum algorithm introduced to tackle classically intractable combinatorial optimization problems. This tutorial offers a comprehensive, first-principles introduction to QAOA and its properties, focusing on its application to Quadratic and Polynomial Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO and PUBO) problems. The tutorial begins by outlining variational quantum circuits and QUBO problems, focusing on their key properties and the encoding of problem constraints through quadratic penalty terms. Next, it explores the QAOA in detail, covering its Hamiltonian formulation, gate decomposition, and example applications, along with their implementation and performance results. This is followed by an analysis of the algorithm's energy landscape, where proofs are provided for its symmetry and periodicity, and where a resulting parameter space reduction is proposed. Finally, the tutorial extends these concepts to PUBO problems by generalizing the results to higher-order Hamiltonians and discussing the associated symmetries and circuit construction.