Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Bit Security Analysis of Lattice-Based KEMs Under Plaintext-Checking Attacks

Ruiqi Mi, Haodong Jiang, Zhenfeng Zhang

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-53368-6_13

Related papers

An Analysis of Lattice-Based Cryptography with Existing Protocols

Atul Chaturvedi, Anand Ballabh Joshi, Sonam Yadav

Algorithms for intelligent systems•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Enhancing Post-Quantum KEMs: A Secure and Efficient Transformation

Sai Charan Reddy Nevuri

This paper proposes a new generic Encrypt-thenMAC (EtM) transformation for constructing IND-CCA secure Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) in the post-quantum setting. The transformation builds on a public-key encryption scheme satisfying one-wayness under plaintext-checking attacks (OW-PCA) and an existentially unforgeable MAC, and formally achieves tight IND-CCA security in the random oracle model via a rigorous security reduction. Unlike the widely used FujisakiOkamoto (FO) transformation, our approach eliminates the need for ciphertext re-encryption during decapsulation-a major source of computational overhead and side-channel vulnerability in lattice-based implementations. We instantiate the transformation using the ML-KEM (FIPS 203) subroutine, yielding the ML-KEM-EtM variant. Experimental results show that ML-KEMEtM reduces decapsulation cycle counts by$72-79 {\%}$across security levels, with only a modest increase in encapsulation cost$(1.8-7.3 {\%})$and ciphertext size$(1.0-2.1 {\%})$. The scheme thus offers a practical and efficient a lternative to F O-based KEMs, especially in performance-critical scenarios such as post-quantum TLS handshakes, where decapsulation efficiency is paramount.

International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)•Mar 19, 2026•0 citations

Lattice-Based Cryptography: A Survey

Xiaoyun Wang, Guangwu Xu, Yang Yu

Chinese Annals of Mathematics Series B•Nov 1, 2023•45 citations

Module Lattice Security (Part IV): Probabilistic Polynomial Quantum Attack on Module-LWE over 2-Power Cyclotomics

Ming-Xing Luo

We present a quantum attack on ML-KEM and related 2-power cyclotomic lattice schemes. Combining with Parts I-III, we provide an algorithm and verify the resulting approximation factor satisfies $γ\le 21 < q/2=1664.5$ for ML-KEM-1024, with a success probability $\ge 0.99$. We apply a tower decomposition of the Principal Ideal Problem (PIP) through the chain $\Q\subset \Q(ζ_8)\subset\cdots\subset \Q(ζ_{2^k})$ which yields a polynomial-time quantum algorithm costing $O(n^3 \log^2 n)$ gates, $O(n^2 \log n)$ qubits, and poly$(n)$ classical bit operations. We extend the analysis to Falcon, Hawk, and NTRU over 2-power cyclotomic rings with polynomial-time quantum algorithms.

quant-pharXiv:2605.17412•May 19, 2026•0 citations

Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Key Encapsulation Mechanism in the Standard Model

Shengfeng Xu, Xiangxue Li

Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) is a foundational cryptography primitive, which can provide secure symmetric cryptographic key material for transmission by using public key algorithms. Until now, many Chosen-Ciphertext (IND-CCA) secure KEM schemes are constructed from Chosen-Plaintext (IND-CPA) or One-Way (OW-CPA) secure PKE via the generic Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transformations (TCC 2017). However, the security relies on the Random Oracle Model (ROM). To the best of our knowledge, there are no IND-CCA secure KEM schemes based on Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) assumption that can against post quantum attacks in the standard model. In this work, we propose the first direct construction of LPN-based KEM, which is secure in the standard model. In particular, we use double-trapdoor technique to answer adversary’s decryption queries correctly and a Target Collision Resistant (TCR) hash function to check the validity of the ciphertext. The encapsulated key is determined by a special LPN problem (with no random oracle required). The scheme is IND-CCA secure against post-quantum attacks under the low-noise LPN assumptions by a series of games and the security reduction is tight. Compared with previous schemes on 128-bit security level, our CCA-secure scheme only holds 50.78MB public keys, 62.50MB secret keys and 4.54KB ciphertexts, which is more efficient than the schemes of Döttlinget al.(ASIACRYPT 2012), Kiltzet al.(PKC 2014) and Yuet al.(CRYPTO 2016) ((7.27GB, 7.24GB, 7.03KB), (80.89MB, 46.23MB, 6.80KB) and (70.95MB, 70.65MB, 86.50KB) respectively).

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•7 citations

Multi-bit Cryptosystems Based on Lattice Problems

Akinori Kawachi, Keisuke Tanaka, Keita Xagawa

Springer eBooks•Jun 20, 2007•99 citations
This paper proposes a new generic Encrypt-thenMAC (EtM) transformation for constructing IND-CCA secure Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) in the post-quantum setting. The transformation builds on a public-key encryption scheme satisfying one-wayness under plaintext-checking attacks (OW-PCA) and an existentially unforgeable MAC, and formally achieves tight IND-CCA security in the random oracle model via a rigorous security reduction. Unlike the widely used FujisakiOkamoto (FO) transformation, our approach eliminates the need for ciphertext re-encryption during decapsulation-a major source of computational overhead and side-channel vulnerability in lattice-based implementations. We instantiate the transformation using the ML-KEM (FIPS 203) subroutine, yielding the ML-KEM-EtM variant. Experimental results show that ML-KEMEtM reduces decapsulation cycle counts by72−79%72-79 {\%}72−79%across security levels, with only a modest increase in encapsulation cost(1.8−7.3%)(1.8-7.3 {\%})(1.8−7.3%)and ciphertext size(1.0−2.1%)(1.0-2.1 {\%})(1.0−2.1%). The scheme thus offers a practical and efficient a lternative to F O-based KEMs, especially in performance-critical scenarios such as post-quantum TLS handshakes, where decapsulation efficiency is paramount.
We present a quantum attack on ML-KEM and related 2-power cyclotomic lattice schemes. Combining with Parts I-III, we provide an algorithm and verify the resulting approximation factor satisfies γ≤21<q/2=1664.5γ\le 21 < q/2=1664.5γ≤21<q/2=1664.5 for ML-KEM-1024, with a success probability ≥0.99\ge 0.99≥0.99. We apply a tower decomposition of the Principal Ideal Problem (PIP) through the chain $\Q\subset \Q(ζ_8)\subset\cdots\subset \Q(ζ_{2^k})$ which yields a polynomial-time quantum algorithm costing O(n3log⁡2n)O(n^3 \log^2 n)O(n3log2n) gates, O(n2log⁡n)O(n^2 \log n)O(n2logn) qubits, and poly(n)(n)(n) classical bit operations. We extend the analysis to Falcon, Hawk, and NTRU over 2-power cyclotomic rings with polynomial-time quantum algorithms.
Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) is a foundational cryptography primitive, which can provide secure symmetric cryptographic key material for transmission by using public key algorithms. Until now, many Chosen-Ciphertext (IND-CCA) secure KEM schemes are constructed from Chosen-Plaintext (IND-CPA) or One-Way (OW-CPA) secure PKE via the generic Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transformations (TCC 2017). However, the security relies on the Random Oracle Model (ROM). To the best of our knowledge, there are no IND-CCA secure KEM schemes based on Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) assumption that can against post quantum attacks in the standard model. In this work, we propose the first direct construction of LPN-based KEM, which is secure in the standard model. In particular, we use double-trapdoor technique to answer adversary’s decryption queries correctly and a Target Collision Resistant (TCR) hash function to check the validity of the ciphertext. The encapsulated key is determined by a special LPN problem (with no random oracle required). The scheme is IND-CCA secure against post-quantum attacks under the low-noise LPN assumptions by a series of games and the security reduction is tight. Compared with previous schemes on 128-bit security level, our CCA-secure scheme only holds 50.78MB public keys, 62.50MB secret keys and 4.54KB ciphertexts, which is more efficient than the schemes of Döttlinget al.(ASIACRYPT 2012), Kiltzet al.(PKC 2014) and Yuet al.(CRYPTO 2016) ((7.27GB, 7.24GB, 7.03KB), (80.89MB, 46.23MB, 6.80KB) and (70.95MB, 70.65MB, 86.50KB) respectively).