This paper presents a layered architecture QC-Stack for the quantum computing domain. It is a comprehensive framework explaining quantum computing systems by identifying three fundamental layers: the physical, system, and application layers. Each plays a crucial role in implementing quantum computing systems in practice. The physical layer evaluates quantum hardware technologies based on crucial performance parameters such as qubit quality, connectivity, and scalability. The system layer, which includes quantum firmware, compilers, operating systems, and software development tools, bridges the gap between the physical and application layers. The application layer incorporates Quantum Programming Languages and algorithms, emphasizing their significance in leveraging quantum computing potential across various domains. The paper provides a comparative analysis at a higher level of existing quantum algorithms, protocols, and hardware and software technologies within each sub-layer. It also highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different technologies at each layer. This holistic model can guide researchers and practitioners, offering insights into the ever-evolving landscape of quantum technology.
This paper presents a layered architecture QC-Stack for the quantum computing domain. It is a comprehensive framework explaining quantum computing systems by identifying three fundamental layers: the physical, system, and application layers. Each plays a crucial role in implementing quantum computing systems in practice. The physical layer evaluates quantum hardware technologies based on crucial performance parameters such as qubit quality, connectivity, and scalability. The system layer, which includes quantum firmware, compilers, operating systems, and software development tools, bridges the gap between the physical and application layers. The application layer incorporates Quantum Programming Languages and algorithms, emphasizing their significance in leveraging quantum computing potential across various domains. The paper provides a comparative analysis at a higher level of existing quantum algorithms, protocols, and hardware and software technologies within each sub-layer. It also highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different technologies at each layer. This holistic model can guide researchers and practitioners, offering insights into the ever-evolving landscape of quantum technology.
Abstract Steady progress is being made in the development of quantum computing platforms based on different types of qubit technologies. Each platform requires bespoke strategies to maximise the efficiency of the quantum/classical interface when operating close to the qubits. At a higher level, however, a shared interface allowing portability of quantum algorithms across all the available quantum platforms is preferred. Striking the right balance between portability and performance of the algorithm as implemented on quantum hardware remains a major challenge for this field. Here, we propose a quantum hardware abstraction layer (QHAL) providing a multi-level intermediate representation of the quantum stack. A collaborative effort between software specialists and quantum hardware developers operating on four major qubit technologies (photonics, silicon, superconducting and trapped ions) led to the identification of a minimum common set of instructions and metadata allowing the QHAL to interact efficiently with multiple platforms. Access to the stack from the higher levels increases latency yet minimises the amount of hardware architecture parameters to be handled by the algorithm developer, thus simplifying code development and reducing security threats from misuse or malicious access for hardware developers. Access to the stack from the lowest—closest to the qubits—level provides the highest hardware responsiveness, suitable for algorithms requiring minimum latency for data and instruction transfer. With respect to existing quantum assembly languages, the QHAL extends further down in the stack by defining an application-binary interface to interact with the quantum hardware. By defining a standard representation of the quantum stack, a common reference framework is provided to both software and hardware developers which would ensure future integration of their R&D efforts.
This study examines the current technological components of quantum computing through a multi layered approach. It begins by comparing quantum and classical computers across fundamental aspects such as information representation, computational power, fault tolerance, and computational complexity, with the key differences summarized in a technical comparison table. Subsequently, the study analyzes the primary architectural approaches in quantum hardware, including superconducting qubits, trapped ion systems, and photonic platforms. On the software side, quantum programming languages such as Qiskit, Cirq, and PennyLane are evaluated in terms of their features, supported infrastructures, and learning curves. The significance of variational quantum algorithms tailored for the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era namely, the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) along with hybrid computing systems, is also emphasized. Overall, this work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of modern quantum computing from both hardware and software perspectives, highlighting key developments and ongoing progress in the field.
The connection and eventual integration of High-Performance Computing (HPC) with Quantum Computing (QC) represents a transformative advancement in computational technology, promising significant enhancements in solving complex, previously intractable problems. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of HPC-QC interfacing, detailing architectural methodologies, software stack developments, middleware functionalities, and hardware integration strategies. It critically assesses existing hardware-level integration models, ranging from standalone and loosely-coupled architectures to tightly-integrated and on-node systems. The software ecosystem is analyzed, highlighting prominent frameworks such as Qiskit, PennyLane, CUDA-Q, and middleware solutions like Pilot-Quantum, essential for seamless hybrid computing environments. Furthermore, the manuscript discusses practical applications in optimization, machine learning, and many-body dynamics, where hybrid HPC-QC systems can offer substantial advantages. It also describes existing challenges, including hardware limitations (coherence, scalability, connectivity), software maturity, communication overhead, resource management complexities, and cost factors. Finally, future directions towards tighter hardware and software integration are discussed, emphasizing ongoing research developments and emerging trends that promise to expand the capabilities and accessibility of hybrid HPC-QC systems.
Abstract Quantum computers promise to transform our notions of computation by offering a completely new paradigm. To achieve scalable quantum computation, optimizing compilers and a corresponding software design flow will be essential. We present a software architecture for compiling quantum programs from a high-level language program to hardware-specific instructions. We describe the necessary layers of abstraction and their differences and similarities to classical layers of a computer-aided design flow. For each layer of the stack, we discuss the underlying methods for compilation and optimization. Our software methodology facilitates more rapid innovation among quantum algorithm designers, quantum hardware engineers, and experimentalists. It enables scalable compilation of complex quantum algorithms and can be targeted to any specific quantum hardware implementation.
Quantum computing, built on the principles of quantum mechanics, has emerged as a transformative paradigm with the potential to revolutionize computational capabilities, enabling solutions to problems that are currently intractable for classical systems. Quantum computing integrates hardware, architectures, and software for improved applications while utilizing superposition, entanglement, and interference to promote materials science, cryptography, optimization, and artificial intelligence. Sections introduce and describe the model components needed in order to create quantum processors, including qubits, quantum gates and control electronics, as well as a review of new developments in quantum software frameworks and programming tools. Notable examples, such as Shor’s algorithm for cryptographic caveat, Grover’s algorithm for inefficient search processes, and quantum-enhanced optimization, illuminate the position of quantum computing as a means of tackling tough problems that span disciplines, such as pharmaceuticals, predictors of climate, and finance modeling. However, the field continues to face significant challenges, like limited scalability, quantum gate error rates, qubit coherence times, and difficulties integrating with classical systems. Future efforts will focus on developing hybrid quantum-classical systems, scalable architectures, and industry- specific applications to transition quantum computing from exploration to practical deployment. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of quantum computing, covering its potential, trends, and challenges, while exploring hardware-software integration, classicalquantum comparisons, and insights to guide research and industry in unlocking its revolutionary possibility.
Quantum computing systems rely on the principles of quantum mechanics to perform a multitude of computationally challenging tasks more efficiently than their classical counterparts. The architecture of software-intensive systems can empower architects who can leverage architecture-centric processes, practices, description languages to model, develop, and evolve quantum computing software (quantum software for short) at higher abstraction levels. We conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to investigate (i) architectural process, (ii) modelling notations, (iii) architecture design patterns, (iv) tool support, and (iv) challenging factors for quantum software architecture. Results of the SLR indicate that quantum software represents a new genre of software-intensive systems; however, existing processes and notations can be tailored to derive the architecting activities and develop modelling languages for quantum software. Quantum bits (Qubits) mapped to Quantum gates (Qugates) can be represented as architectural components and connectors that implement quantum software. Tool-chains can incorporate reusable knowledge and human roles (e.g., quantum domain engineers, quantum code developers) to automate and customise the architectural process. Results of this SLR can facilitate researchers and practitioners to develop new hypotheses to be tested, derive reference architectures, and leverage architecture-centric principles and practices to engineer emerging and next generations of quantum software.