Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Recognizing matrix equations as eigenequations or not: Examples of student reasoning in quantum mechanics

Megan Wawro, John R. Thompson

Published Oct 19, 2022• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Recognizing matrix equations as eigenequations or not: Examples of student reasoning in quantum mechanics

Related papers

Student reasoning about superposition in quantum mechanics

Gina Passante, Paul J. Emigh, Peter S. Shaffer

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 3, 2014•0 citations

The matrix equations of quantum mechanics

S. G. Eckstein, B. B. Varga, S. Ø. Aks

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Apr 1, 1972•4 citations

Student Challenges in Understanding Quantum Mechanics: Effect of the “Logic paradigm shift”

Jerome Manyahi

For three centuries Newtonian mechanics had been firmly established as a valid theory for the understanding of physical reality; if one understands the laws of physics, then one understands the whole universe. Classical physicists had contented themselves with the search for regularities in measurements and in the physical world. Irregularities were regarded as noises that interfered with the deterministic picture of physical reality. However, from 1900s onwards with the quantum hypothesis, physicists had begun to recognize that the physics of Newton and Maxwell were inadequate for the understanding of all of the physical reality. For example, the interaction of radiation with matter could not be explained from classical physics. This dilemma led to the discovery of quantum mechanics. In this article we explore the challenges that students face in understanding quantum mechanics that arises from paradigm shift in the mode of reasoning about the physical world. The description of physical reality in general and quantum reality in particular requires that we shift our mode of reasoning from classical Boolean logic to quantum non Boolean logic.

•Aug 23, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics from a Linear Algebra Viewpoint

IISc lecture notes series•Nov 1, 2023•0 citations

Bridging a quantum-mechanical barrier [engineering education]

Roger E. Story

Most engineers need a basic understanding of quantum mechanics, and for this the typical college introduction is enough. Such an introduction tends to be axiomatic but physically unenlightening. The rules of quantum mechanics (QM) are a fait accompli; justified because they work. This is a good beginning, but those needing to learn more face a special quantum barrier: more advanced texts often continue in the axiomatic tradition. Infinite-dimensional spaces, amplitude vectors, matrices, and operators in lieu of momentum and energy-these and other concepts may be introduced with little rationalization or intuition. To an inquiring student, QM can quickly become bizarre; something to be manipulated but not understood. This need not be so. Here the authors present one teaching solution. They show that many of QM's key ideas can be reasoned out from just a few physical assumptions with mathematics that is low in dimension, linear and accessible to many. Some results include a simple reason for believing probability amplitudes are more natural to use than probabilities, the duality of functions as vectors and vice versa, an example of how a matrix, an operator and a physical value might be related, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and Schrodinger's equation.

IEEE Transactions on Education•Jan 1, 1998•3 citations

Dirac notation: difficulties of the third-year undergraduate physics students

Philippe Lautesse, Fabrice Ferlin, Bogna Kubik +1 more

Abstract Learning quantum mechanics (QM) is widely recognized as a challenging task, as it involves highly abstract concepts and requires a significant shift from classical physics reasoning. Developing expertise in QM requires students to represent physical concepts using multiple formalisms, such as Dirac notation and algebraic representations, and to move flexibly between them. This study investigates two main categories of student difficulties related to Dirac notation. The first concerns difficulties in expressing a generic state vector in the position and momentum representations. The second relates to challenges in writing the eigenvectors of the position and momentum operators in Dirac notation. To explore these issues, we administered questionnaires to third-year undergraduate physics students enrolled in a QM course at the Lyon 1 University. We present a detailed analysis of student responses, identify the principal difficulties encountered, and compare our findings with results reported in prior American studies. Our results show that many students struggle to establish a clear connection between Dirac notation and its functional algebraic representation. In particular, students find it easier to recognize state vectors and eigenvectors than to construct them explicitly. Additionally, common difficulties include confusion between bras (e.g. x | and p |) and the corresponding operators, as well as confusion between the Dirac delta distribution and the Kronecker delta. Finally, we propose some interpretations of our results in light of those reported in previous studies.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 31, 2026•0 citations
For three centuries Newtonian mechanics had been firmly established as a valid theory for the understanding of physical reality; if one understands the laws of physics, then one understands the whole universe. Classical physicists had contented themselves with the search for regularities in measurements and in the physical world. Irregularities were regarded as noises that interfered with the deterministic picture of physical reality. However, from 1900s onwards with the quantum hypothesis, physicists had begun to recognize that the physics of Newton and Maxwell were inadequate for the understanding of all of the physical reality. For example, the interaction of radiation with matter could not be explained from classical physics. This dilemma led to the discovery of quantum mechanics. In this article we explore the challenges that students face in understanding quantum mechanics that arises from paradigm shift in the mode of reasoning about the physical world. The description of physical reality in general and quantum reality in particular requires that we shift our mode of reasoning from classical Boolean logic to quantum non Boolean logic.
Most engineers need a basic understanding of quantum mechanics, and for this the typical college introduction is enough. Such an introduction tends to be axiomatic but physically unenlightening. The rules of quantum mechanics (QM) are a fait accompli; justified because they work. This is a good beginning, but those needing to learn more face a special quantum barrier: more advanced texts often continue in the axiomatic tradition. Infinite-dimensional spaces, amplitude vectors, matrices, and operators in lieu of momentum and energy-these and other concepts may be introduced with little rationalization or intuition. To an inquiring student, QM can quickly become bizarre; something to be manipulated but not understood. This need not be so. Here the authors present one teaching solution. They show that many of QM's key ideas can be reasoned out from just a few physical assumptions with mathematics that is low in dimension, linear and accessible to many. Some results include a simple reason for believing probability amplitudes are more natural to use than probabilities, the duality of functions as vectors and vice versa, an example of how a matrix, an operator and a physical value might be related, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and Schrodinger's equation.
Abstract Learning quantum mechanics (QM) is widely recognized as a challenging task, as it involves highly abstract concepts and requires a significant shift from classical physics reasoning. Developing expertise in QM requires students to represent physical concepts using multiple formalisms, such as Dirac notation and algebraic representations, and to move flexibly between them. This study investigates two main categories of student difficulties related to Dirac notation. The first concerns difficulties in expressing a generic state vector in the position and momentum representations. The second relates to challenges in writing the eigenvectors of the position and momentum operators in Dirac notation. To explore these issues, we administered questionnaires to third-year undergraduate physics students enrolled in a QM course at the Lyon 1 University. We present a detailed analysis of student responses, identify the principal difficulties encountered, and compare our findings with results reported in prior American studies. Our results show that many students struggle to establish a clear connection between Dirac notation and its functional algebraic representation. In particular, students find it easier to recognize state vectors and eigenvectors than to construct them explicitly. Additionally, common difficulties include confusion between bras (e.g. x | and p |) and the corresponding operators, as well as confusion between the Dirac delta distribution and the Kronecker delta. Finally, we propose some interpretations of our results in light of those reported in previous studies.