Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum science and technology

Gaussian Boson Sampling

Claudio Conti

Published Sep 4, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-44226-1_12

Related papers

Experimental Gaussian Boson sampling

Han-Sen Zhong, Li-Chao Peng, Yuan Li +15 more

arXiv:1905.00170•中国科学通报:英文版•Apr 1, 2019•72 citations

Bipartite Gaussian Boson Sampling for Hamiltonian Cycles in Directed Graphs

Miaomiao Yu, Jingyi Lv, Yan Wang +2 more

Bipartite Gaussian boson sampling (BipartiteGBS) produces output probabilities governed by squared permanents of submatrices of arbitrary complex matrices, matching the nonsymmetric structure of directed graphs. Most GBS-based graph algorithms, however, rely on symmetric hafnian structure and are formulated for undirected problems. Here we propose a BipartiteGBS-based framework for directed-graph heuristic optimization. We introduce Max-Perm as a canonical optimization task for BipartiteGBS and derive a closed-form sampling enhancement factor relative to uniform classical sampling in this idealized setting. We then use permanent-biased BipartiteGBS samples to guide a genetic algorithm for the celebrated directed Hamiltonian cycle problem. Numerical experiments on Erdős--Rényi random directed graphs show that the resulting BipartiteGBS-enhanced algorithms improve success rates over a standard genetic algorithm and yield longer valid paths when no Hamiltonian cycle is found, while ablation tests indicate that BipartiteGBS-guided initialization is the dominant contributor. These results show how permanent-based photonic sampling can provide useful algorithmic guidance for asymmetric combinatorial search.

quant-pharXiv:2606.28775•Jun 30, 2026•0 citations

Proof of the hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling with an arbitrary number of squeezed input modes

Laura Shou, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Victor Galitski +1 more

Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a sampling task proposed to demonstrate quantum advantage. We consider Gaussian boson sampling on $M$ optical modes, with $K$ equally squeezed input modes and $N$ observed photon counts. We complete the proof of the hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling with an arbitrary number of squeezers $K$, which is a part of the argument for classical hardness of GBS. In particular, we show that for any $K$ and $N=o(\sqrt{K})$, the symmetric product $MK^{-1/2}U_{NK}U_{NK}^T$, for $U_{NK}$ the top left $N\times K$ submatrix of an $M\times M$ Haar random unitary $U$, is close in total variation distance to both an $N\times N$ symmetric complex Gaussian matrix $\mathbf G$ with independent entries, and the symmetric product $GG^T/\sqrt{K}$ for $G$ an $N\times K$ matrix of iid standard complex Gaussians. We show however that the density-based instance generating method of [Aaronson and Arkhipov, Theory Comput. 9, 143 (2013), Lemma 5.8] used to efficiently implement a hiding procedure fails for Gaussian boson sampling with $K=cM$ if $c<1/2$. Instead we use approximate instance generating to implement the hiding for the usual classical hardness reduction.

quant-pharXiv:2608.19314•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

Simulating Gaussian boson sampling on graphs in polynomial time

Konrad Anand, Zongchen Chen, Mary Cryan +4 more

We show that a distribution related to Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) on graphs can be sampled classically in polynomial time. Graphical applications of GBS typically sample from this distribution, and thus quantum algorithms do not provide exponential speedup for these applications. We also show that another distribution related to Boson sampling can be sampled classically in polynomial time.

quant-pharXiv:2511.16558•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

Classical simulations of Gaussian boson sampling

Rachel S. Chadwick

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Simulating Sparse and Shallow Gaussian Boson Sampling

Zoltán Kolarovszki, Ágoston Kaposi, Tamás Kozsik +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations
Bipartite Gaussian boson sampling (BipartiteGBS) produces output probabilities governed by squared permanents of submatrices of arbitrary complex matrices, matching the nonsymmetric structure of directed graphs. Most GBS-based graph algorithms, however, rely on symmetric hafnian structure and are formulated for undirected problems. Here we propose a BipartiteGBS-based framework for directed-graph heuristic optimization. We introduce Max-Perm as a canonical optimization task for BipartiteGBS and derive a closed-form sampling enhancement factor relative to uniform classical sampling in this idealized setting. We then use permanent-biased BipartiteGBS samples to guide a genetic algorithm for the celebrated directed Hamiltonian cycle problem. Numerical experiments on Erdős--Rényi random directed graphs show that the resulting BipartiteGBS-enhanced algorithms improve success rates over a standard genetic algorithm and yield longer valid paths when no Hamiltonian cycle is found, while ablation tests indicate that BipartiteGBS-guided initialization is the dominant contributor. These results show how permanent-based photonic sampling can provide useful algorithmic guidance for asymmetric combinatorial search.
Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a sampling task proposed to demonstrate quantum advantage. We consider Gaussian boson sampling on MMM optical modes, with KKK equally squeezed input modes and NNN observed photon counts. We complete the proof of the hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling with an arbitrary number of squeezers KKK, which is a part of the argument for classical hardness of GBS. In particular, we show that for any KKK and N=o(K)N=o(\sqrt{K})N=o(K​), the symmetric product MK−1/2UNKUNKTMK^{-1/2}U_{NK}U_{NK}^TMK−1/2UNK​UNKT​, for UNKU_{NK}UNK​ the top left N×KN\times KN×K submatrix of an M×MM\times MM×M Haar random unitary UUU, is close in total variation distance to both an N×NN\times NN×N symmetric complex Gaussian matrix G\mathbf GG with independent entries, and the symmetric product GGT/KGG^T/\sqrt{K}GGT/K​ for GGG an N×KN\times KN×K matrix of iid standard complex Gaussians. We show however that the density-based instance generating method of [Aaronson and Arkhipov, Theory Comput. 9, 143 (2013), Lemma 5.8] used to efficiently implement a hiding procedure fails for Gaussian boson sampling with K=cMK=cMK=cM if c<1/2c<1/2c<1/2. Instead we use approximate instance generating to implement the hiding for the usual classical hardness reduction.