Group signatures and their variants have been widely used in privacy-sensitive scenarios such as anonymous authentication and attestation. In this paper, we present a new post-quantum group signature scheme from symmetric primitives. Using only symmetric primitives makes the scheme less prone to unknown attacks than basing the design on newly proposed hard problems whose security is less well-understood. However, symmetric primitives do not have rich algebraic properties, and this makes it extremely challenging to design a group signature scheme on top of them. It is even more challenging if we want a group signature scheme suitable for real-world applications, one that can support large groups and require few trust assumptions. Our scheme is based on MPC-in-the-head non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs, and we specifically design a novel hash-based group credential scheme, which is rooted in the SPHINCS+ signature scheme but with various modifications to make it MPC (multi-party computation) friendly. The security of the scheme has been proved under the fully dynamic group signature model. We provide an implementation of the scheme and demonstrate the feasibility of handling a group size as large as 2 60 . This is the first group signature scheme from symmetric primitives that supports such a large group size and meets all the security requirements.
Group signatures and their variants have been widely used in privacy-sensitive scenarios such as anonymous authentication and attestation. In this paper, we present a new post-quantum group signature scheme from symmetric primitives. Using only symmetric primitives makes the scheme less prone to unknown attacks than basing the design on newly proposed hard problems whose security is less well-understood. However, symmetric primitives do not have rich algebraic properties, and this makes it extremely challenging to design a group signature scheme on top of them. It is even more challenging if we want a group signature scheme suitable for real-world applications, one that can support large groups and require few trust assumptions. Our scheme is based on MPC-in-the-head non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs, and we specifically design a novel hash-based group credential scheme, which is rooted in the SPHINCS+ signature scheme but with various modifications to make it MPC (multi-party computation) friendly. The security of the scheme has been proved under the fully dynamic group signature model. We provide an implementation of the scheme and demonstrate the feasibility of handling a group size as large as 2 60 . This is the first group signature scheme from symmetric primitives that supports such a large group size and meets all the security requirements.
The rise of quantum computing threatens to break many of the cryptographic systems that secure today’s digital world. In response, researchers are developing new tools designed to remain secure in a post-quantum future. Most of the promising candidates for post-quantum digital signatures rely on security assumptions based on lattices or properties of hash functions. Another promising approach transforms secure multi-party computation protocols into zero-knowledge proofs, which are then turned into digital signatures. This technique, known as multi-party computation in-the-head (MPCitH), offers strong security properties and flexibility for distributed applications. This thesis investigates whether MPCitH digital signatures can be efficiently adapted for use by two cooperating parties to jointly produce a signature. Here we show how to construct two-party signatures based on syndrome decoding in-the-head (SDitH) signatures. We propose a provably secure scheme that achieves the smallest known communication overhead among two-party MPCitH signatures, while resulting in a signature size approximately double that of a single-prover variant. This result provides a new data point in the design space of multi-party MPCitH signatures and post-quantum digital signatures in general.
Abstract. We solve an open question in code-based cryptography by introducing the first provably secure group signature scheme from code-based assumptions. Specifically, the scheme satisfies the CPA-anonymity and traceability requirements in the random oracle model, assuming the hardness of the McEliece problem, the Learning Parity with Noise prob-lem, and a variant of the Syndrome Decoding problem. Our construction produces smaller key and signature sizes than the existing post-quantum group signature schemes from lattices, as long as the cardinality of the underlying group does not exceed the population of the Netherlands ( ≈ 224 users). The feasibility of the scheme is supported by implementa-tion results. Additionally, the techniques introduced in this work might be of independent interest: a new verifiable encryption protocol for the randomized McEliece encryption and a new approach to design formal security reductions from the Syndrome Decoding problem.
Abstract Quantum computing creates new security risks for legacy satellite communication systems, especially for Telemetry, Tracking, and Control (TT&C) links. Hash-Based Signature (HBS) schemes are seen as the safest option for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) migrations, as they only depend on the collision resistance of hash functions without involving complex security assumptions. But in practice, applying current HBS standards in engineering is tough due to the trade-off between signature size and computational overhead. We solve this problem by proposing CP-WOTS+, an optimization scheme based on checkpoint pre-computation. By introducing a checkpoint mechanism to the signer, we achieved a compact signature of 1088 bytes under the w = 256 parameter set, while reducing the generation time from 7.15 to 0.45 ms (a 15.9× 15.9 × speedup). Building on this primitive, we designed the CP-XMSS-GS group signature scheme for multi-party satellite control. This scheme implements a centralized authorization model that offloads complexity to the ground: the satellite remains strictly stateless (storing only a 64-byte group public key) and just handles verification. Complex member management and traceability are handled by the ground administrator. Experimental results demonstrate that our scheme maintains a small signature size of 1764 bytes and ensures anonymity and traceability, and it requires zero on-orbit updates when members change. Our work provides a highly secure, lightweight post-quantum solution for resource-constrained satellite-ground links.
Zero-knowledge proofs allow a prover to convince a verifier of the veracity of a statement without revealing any other information. An interesting class of zero-knowledge protocols are those following the MPC-in-the-head paradigm (Ishai et al., STOC '07) which use secure multiparty computation (MPC) protocols as the basis. Efficient instances of this paradigm have emerged as an active research topic in the last years, starting with ZKBoo (Giacomelli et al., USENIX '16). Zero-knowledge protocols are a vital building block in the design of privacy-preserving technologies as well as cryptographic primitives like digital signature schemes that provide post-quantum security. This work investigates the security of zero-knowledge protocols following the MPC-in-the-head paradigm. We provide the first machine-checked security proof of such a protocol on the example of ZKBoo. Our proofs are checked in the EasyCrypt proof assistant. To enable a modular security proof, we develop a new security notion for the MPC protocols used in MPC-in-the-head zero-knowledge protocols. This allows us to recast existing security proofs in a black-box fashion which we believe to be of independent interest.
Anonymous authentication schemes such as group signatures and anonymous credentials are important privacy-protecting tools in electronic communications. The only currently known scheme based on assumptions that resist quantum attacks is the group signature scheme by Gordon et al. (ASIACRYPT 2010). We present a generalization of group signatures called anonymous attribute tokens where users are issued attribute-containing credentials that they can use to anonymously sign messages and generate tokens revealing only a subset of their attributes. We present two lattice-based constructions of this new primitive, one with and one without opening capabilities for the group manager. The latter construction directly yields as a special case the first lattice-based group signature scheme offering full anonymity (in the random-oracle model), as opposed to the practically less relevant notion of chosen-plaintext anonymity offered by the scheme of Gordon et al. We also extend our scheme to protect users from framing attacks by the group manager, where the latter creates tokens or signatures in the name of honest users. Our constructions involve new lattice-based tools for aggregating signatures and verifiable CCA2-secure encryption.
Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a widely acknowledged framework enabling the design of multi-party protocols that preserve the privacy of parties' inputs while ensuring the correct evaluation of the desired functionality. Crucially, these security guarantees should hold even in the presence of external entities who are empowered with some adversarial capabilities, such as controlling the communication channels used throughout the protocol run or forcing a subset of the parties to behave arbitrarily (so-called ``malicious" or ``byzantine" corruptions). Concretely, a user can instantiate secure MPC protocols on a device to carry out computations involving sensitive information with other untrusted parties. Despite capturing very general classes of real-world threats, one limitation of ``traditional" MPC lies in assuming at least one ``honest" party who, throughout the protocol run, behaves exactly as per the theoretical specification of the protocol itself. For several practical settings this may be unrealistic, as the devices used to run the protocol are themselves exposed to a plethora of threats, such as attacks on software or hardware components. Moreover, the security guarantees provided by secure MPC could be voided if a protocol is found to be faulty, be it from cryptographic assumptions falling short or from an incorrect formalization of the protocol itself. In this composition, we explore more expressive frameworks that enable the design of secure MPC protocols and cryptographic primitives even in the presence of untrusted devices. We first consider cryptographic reverse firewalls: lightweight devices that sanitize a party's traffic while preserving the correctness of the protocol. These objects were originally introduced by Mironov and Stephens-Davidowitz (EUROCRYPT'15) and later embedded in the framework of subversion-resilient Universal Composability (srUC) due to Chakraborty et al. (EUROCRYPT'22). Under the srUC framework, it is possible to design protocols that provide meaningful security guarantees even if the devices of honest parties have been tampered with in an undetectable manner with the goal of exfiltrating information (so-called ``specious subversion attacks"). In particular, we focus on the design of protocols for Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (PAKE): a cryptographic primitive that enables two parties to mutually authenticate by establishing a shared high-entropy key leveraging exclusively some (possibly low-entropy) pre-shared password. (1) Our first contribution focuses on sanitizing the PAKE protocol from Oblivious Transfer (OT) due to Canetti et al. (PKC'12). For that, we design and instantiate novel cryptographic primitives with sanitation-friendly properties that may be of independent interest, including sanitizable variants of oblivious transfer, dual-mode cryptosystems, and signature schemes. As an additional contribution, we formalize the unauthenticated setting in the srUC framework by extending the framework of split-authentication due to Barak et al. (CRYPTO'05, JoC'07). This is the first PAKE protocol ever designed in the srUC framework. (2) Our second contribution consists of sanitizing the PAKE protocol from trapdoor smooth-projective hashing due to Benhamouda and Pointcheval (CRYPTO'13). The sanitation requires non-trivial modifications to the original protocol, whose security relies on a CCA-secure encryption scheme - an inherently non-malleable primitive. Along the way, we bring advances to the field of malleable smooth-projective hash functions, originally introduced by Chen et al. (ASIACRYPT'16), and coin the notion of malleable trapdoor smooth-projective hashing. Our resulting PAKE protocol has better communication and round complexity compared to the aforementioned PAKE-from-OT. We then shift our attention to t-out-of-n robust combiners: constructions that take as input n candidate instantiations of some cryptographic primitive to securely realize the same primitive, as long as at least t of the candidates are secure. These objects were first formalized by Harnik et al. (EUROCRYPT'05), where robustness is characterized by explicitly forbidding combiners from re-implementing the desired primitive from scratch. Here, we focus on Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge (NIZK): a cryptographic primitive that allows a prover to convince a verifier of the veracity of some NP-statement by using a single message (commonly referred to as a ``proof"). (3) Our third contribution provides a comprehensive characterization of robust combiners for NIZK. We show the first formal definition of these objects, and prove that no robust NIZK combiner exists for t ≤ n/2 unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. To complement our negative results, we provide three incomparable constructions: (i) A black-box combiner for {\em homomorphic} NP languages, where n,t are polynomial and t > n/2; (ii) A non-black-box combiner for any NP language, where n,t are constant and t > n/2; (iii) A non-black-box combiner for any NP language, where n,t are polynomial and t > 2n/3.