Abstract In the conventional Schrödinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics the unitary evolution of a state ψ is controlled, in Hilbert space <?CDATA ${\mathcal{L}}$?> L , by a Hamiltonian ɧ which must be self-adjoint. In the recent, “quasi-Hermitian” reformulation of the theory one replaces ɧ by its isospectral but non-Hermitian avatar H = Ω−1 𝖍Ω with Ω†Ω = Θ ≠ I. Although acting in another, manifestly unphysical Hilbert space <?CDATA ${\mathcal{H}}$?> H , the amended Hamiltonian H ≠ H † can be perceived as self-adjoint with respect to the amended inner-product metric Θ. In our paper motivated by a generic technical “user-unfriendliness” of the non-Hermiticity of H we introduce and describe a specific new family of Hamiltonians H for which the metrics Θ become available in closed form.
Abstract In the conventional Schrödinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics the unitary evolution of a state ψ is controlled, in Hilbert space <?CDATA ${\mathcal{L}}$?> L , by a Hamiltonian ɧ which must be self-adjoint. In the recent, “quasi-Hermitian” reformulation of the theory one replaces ɧ by its isospectral but non-Hermitian avatar H = Ω−1 𝖍Ω with Ω†Ω = Θ ≠ I. Although acting in another, manifestly unphysical Hilbert space <?CDATA ${\mathcal{H}}$?> H , the amended Hamiltonian H ≠ H † can be perceived as self-adjoint with respect to the amended inner-product metric Θ. In our paper motivated by a generic technical “user-unfriendliness” of the non-Hermiticity of H we introduce and describe a specific new family of Hamiltonians H for which the metrics Θ become available in closed form.
In the conventional Schrödinger's formulation of quantum mechanics the unitary evolution of a state ψ is controlled, in Hilbert space L, by a Hamiltonian h which must be self-adjoint. In the recent, ``quasi-Hermitian'' reformulation of the theory one replaces h by its isospectral but non-Hermitian avatar H=Ω−1hΩ with Ω†Ω=Θ=I. Although acting in another, manifestly unphysical Hilbert space H, the amended Hamiltonian H=H† can be perceived as self-adjoint with respect to the amended inner-product metric Θ. In our paper motivated by a generic technical ``user-unfriendliness'' of the non-Hermiticity of H we introduce and describe a specific new family of Hamiltonians H for which the metrics Θ become available in closed form.
In conventional Schrodinger representation the unitarity of the evolution of bound states is guaranteed by the Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian. A non-unitary isospectral simplification of the Hamiltonian, h→H=ΩhΩ=H† induces the change L→K of the Hilbert space of states, reflected by the loss of the Hermiticity of H=H†. In such a reformulation of the theory the introduction of an {\it ad hoc} inner-product metric reconverts K into the third, correct physical Hilbert space H, unitarily equivalent to L. The situation encountered, typically, in PT−symmetric or relativistic quantum mechanics is shown more complicated after an inclusion of perturbations. The formulation and solution of the problem are presented. Some of the consequences relevant, e.g., in the analysis of stability are discussed.
Abstract In quantum mechanics of unitary systems using non-Hermitian (or, more precisely, Θ-quasi-Hermitian) Hamiltonians H such that <?CDATA H†Θ=ΘH?> H † Θ = Θ H , the exactly solvable M-level bound-state models with arbitrary <?CDATA M⩽∞?> M ⩽ ∞ are rare. A new class of such models is proposed here, therefore. Its exact algebraic solvability (involving not only the closed formulae for wave functions but also the explicit description of all of the eligible metrics Θ) was achieved due to an extremely sparse (viz., just <?CDATA (2M−1)?> ( 2 M − 1 ) -parametric) but still nontrivial ‘zig-zag-matrix’ choice of the form of H.
In quite a few recent quantum models one is allowed to make a given Hamiltonian H self-adjoint only after an ad hoc generalization of Hermitian conjugation, H†→H‡:= Θ −1H†Θ wherethe suitable operator Θ is called Hilbert-space metric. In the generalized, hidden-Hermiticity scenario with nontrivial metric Θ≠ I the current concept of solvability (meaning, most often, the feasibility of a non-numerical diagonalization of H) requires a generalization (allowing for a non-numerical tractabilityof Θ). A few very elementary samples of "solvable" quantum models of this new type are presented.
Abstract In 1992, Scholtz et al. ( Ann. Phys., 213 (1992) 74) showed that a set of non-Hermitian operators can represent observables of a closed unitary quantum system, provided only that its elements are quasi-Hermitian ( i.e. , roughly speaking, Hermitian with respect to an ad hoc inner-product metric). We show that such a version of quantum mechanics admits a simultaneous closed-form representation of the metric and of the observables , in terms of auxiliary operators Z k with . At N = 2 the formalism degenerates to the well-known quantum mechanics using factorized metric , where is parity and where is charge.
To the existing list of alternative formulations of quantum mechanics, a new version of the non-Hermitian interaction picture is added. What is new is that, in contrast to the more conventional non-Hermitian model-building recipes, the primary information about the observable phenomena is provided not only by the Hamiltonian but also by an additional operator with a real spectrum (say, R(t)) representing another observable. In the language of physics, the information carried by R(t)≠R†(t) opens the possibility of reaching the exceptional-point degeneracy of the real eigenvalues, i.e., a specific quantum phase transition. In parallel, the unitarity of the system remains guaranteed, as usual, via a time-dependent inner-product metric Θ(t). From the point of view of mathematics, the control of evolution is provided by a pair of conjugate Schrödiner equations. This opens the possibility od an innovative dyadic representation of pure states, by which the direct use of Θ(t) is made redundant. The implementation of the formalism is illustrated via a schematic cosmological toy model in which the canonical quantization leads to the necessity of working with two conjugate Wheeler-DeWitt equations. From the point of view of physics, the “kinematical input” operator R(t) may represent either the radius of a homogeneous and isotropic expanding empty Universe or, if you wish, its Hubble radius, or the scale factor a(t) emerging in the popular Lemaitre-Friedmann-Robertson-Walker classical solutions, with the exceptional-point singularity of the spectrum of R(t) mimicking the birth of the Universe (“Big Bang”) at t=0.