Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Some Simple Examples

Steven H. Simon

Published Sep 29, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract We explicitly work out the details of some simple examples anyon theories. We start with a fusion ring and using consistency conditions we build F-matrices, then the possible braidings (R-matrices). We consider Z2 fusion rules, Fibonacci fusion rules and Z3 fusion rules as simple cases. We consider Ising fusion rules, obtaining eight possible (modular) unitary braided theories. We then describe several more abelian theories, including the toric code, and general ZN anyons. These can be extended to describe all possible abelian braided theories in terms of a limited number of so-called “prime” theories.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198886723.003.0018

Related papers

Anyons and Inherently Complex F-symbols

Matthew Buican, Peter Huston, Jiannis K. Pachos

Anyons in $2+1$ dimensions are not only characterized by exotic braiding statistics but also by intricate fusion properties. Two anyons may fuse into multiple topological charge sectors, and associativity of fusing three anyons to produce a fixed charge sector is governed by $F$-symbols. While braiding invariants, such as the modular data, are typically complex valued, a complete description of general anyon models requires understanding the arithmetic properties of its fusion associativity data as well. The $F$-symbols for many of the most common $2+1$d topological orders, including all Abelian anyon models as well as Fibonacci and Ising anyons, can be made real valued. We show this phenomenon is not universal by exhibiting braided fusion categories whose $F$-symbols cannot be made real. We call such $F$-symbols "inherently complex." The examples we study lack a charge-conjugation symmetry and our results are therefore consistent with the converse of a statement proved in a companion work linking real $F$-symbols in braided fusion categories with the existence of a suitable charge-conjugation symmetry. We analyse the smallest-rank braided fusion categories we know of with inherently complex $F$-symbols: ${\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_7\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_3)$ and ${\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_5\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_4)$. Consequently, the corresponding $\mathcal Z({\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_7\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_3))$ and $\mathcal Z({\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_5\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_4))$ anyon models also have inherently complex $F$-symbols. Our presentation connects these examples with recent results on classifying anyons beyond modular data.

cond-mat.str-elCross-listedarXiv:2607.10181•Jul 14, 2026•0 citations

Non-Abelian Anyons and Braid Group Representations for Topological Quantum Computation — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Anyon braiding provides non-Abelian statistics for topological quantum computation, with braid group representations forming the computational basis. | MATH: Braid group \(B_n\) generators \(\sigma_i\) satisfy \(\sigma_i\sigma_{i+1}\sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1}\sigma_i\sigma_{i+1}\) (Yang–Baxter equation); non-Abelian anyons carry unitary braid matrices \(U(\sigma_i)\) with \(U(\sigma_i)U(\sigma_{i+1})U(\sigma_i) = U(\sigma_{i+1})U(\sigma_i)U(\sigma_{i+1})\); Fibonacci anyons have fusion rule \(\tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau\), yielding quantum dimension \(\phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618\) (golden ratio); topological protection arises from ground-state degeneracy on genus-\(g\) surfaces: \(\dim \mathcal{H} = 4^g\) for toric code, or \(2^g\) for Ising anyons. | CONNECTION: Fibonacci anyons' quantum dimension is *exactly* the golden ratio \(\phi = 1.618\), and its inverse \(\phi^{-1} = 0.618\) appears in braid fusion probabilities; the Yang–Baxter equation is a braided analogue of th Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 21, 2026•0 citations

Anyons From Discrete Group Elements

Steven H. Simon

Abstract Given a discrete group, we consider planar diagrams where each edge is labeled with an element of the group, and vertices must obey the rule that multiplication of the edges incident on the vertex (in order) must yield the identity. The possible F-matrices for such a diagram are discussed and are known as 3-cocycles from the formalism of group cohomology. We discuss a simple example of building anyons from the ZN group. Noncommutative groups can be considered although they cannot describe a braided theory.

•Sep 29, 2023•0 citations

Fusion and Structure of Hilbert Space

Steven H. Simon

Abstract In this chapter we begin the detailed structure of anyon theories, or TQFTs. We introduce the concept of fusion and explain how it is related to the Hilbert space of the anyon systems. We emphasize the importance of locality as a principle for understanding anyons. Associativity is a strong constraint on possible particle fusion rules. As examples, we introduce both Fibonacci anyons and Ising anyons. We explain how the fusion rules of an anyon theory can be used to calculate the degeneracy of the ground state on arbitrary 2-manifolds.

•Sep 29, 2023•0 citations

Non-Abelian Anyon Fusion Mirrors Braid Groups for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Non-Abelian anyon fusion algebras exhibit self-similarity that mirrors the braid group structure, enabling fault-tolerant topological quantum computation via braiding operations. MATH: - Braid group \( B_n \) generators \( \sigma_i \) satisfy \( \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \) and \( \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i \) for \( |i-j|>1 \). - Fusion algebra: \( \phi_a \times \phi_b = \sum_c N_{ab}^c \phi_c \), where \( N_{ab}^c \) are non-negative integers (fusion coefficients). For non-Abelian anyons, \( \sum_c N_{ab}^c > 1 \) for some \( a,b \). - Fibonacci anyon model: single nontrivial particle \( \tau \) with fusion rule \( \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau \), leading to quantum dimension \( d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 \). - Braiding matrices yield phases \( e^{i\theta} \) with \( \theta = 2\pi/5, 4\pi/5 \) (related to golden angle \( 2\pi/\phi^2 \approx 137.5^\circ \)). CONNECTION: - Fibonacci anyon quant Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Jul 20, 2026•0 citations

Non-Abelian Anyon Braiding Enables Topological Quantum Computation — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Non-Abelian anyon fusion algebra exhibits self-similarity under braid group representations, enabling topological quantum computation via braiding operations. MATH: - Braid group \( B_n \) generators \( \sigma_i \) satisfy \( \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \) and \( \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i \) for \( |i-j|>1 \). - Hecke algebra relations: \( (\sigma_i - q^{1/2})(\sigma_i + q^{-1/2}) = 0 \), with \( q = e^{2\pi i/k} \) for SU(2)_k anyons. - Fusion rules: \( \phi_a \times \phi_b = \sum_c N_{ab}^c \phi_c \), where \( N_{ab}^c \) are non-negative integers (fusion coefficients). - Fibonacci anyon fusion: \( \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau \), with quantum dimension \( d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 \). CONNECTION: - Fibonacci anyon quantum dimension \( d_\tau = \phi = 1.618 \) (golden ratio). - Braid matrix eigenvalues for Fibonacci anyons: \( e^{\pm 3\pi i/5} \), related to golden ratio via \( 2\cos(3\pi/5) Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Jul 21, 2026•0 citations
Abstract We explicitly work out the details of some simple examples anyon theories. We start with a fusion ring and using consistency conditions we build F-matrices, then the possible braidings (R-matrices). We consider Z2 fusion rules, Fibonacci fusion rules and Z3 fusion rules as simple cases. We consider Ising fusion rules, obtaining eight possible (modular) unitary braided theories. We then describe several more abelian theories, including the toric code, and general ZN anyons. These can be extended to describe all possible abelian braided theories in terms of a limited number of so-called “prime” theories.
Anyons in 2+12+12+1 dimensions are not only characterized by exotic braiding statistics but also by intricate fusion properties. Two anyons may fuse into multiple topological charge sectors, and associativity of fusing three anyons to produce a fixed charge sector is governed by FFF-symbols. While braiding invariants, such as the modular data, are typically complex valued, a complete description of general anyon models requires understanding the arithmetic properties of its fusion associativity data as well. The FFF-symbols for many of the most common 2+12+12+1d topological orders, including all Abelian anyon models as well as Fibonacci and Ising anyons, can be made real valued. We show this phenomenon is not universal by exhibiting braided fusion categories whose FFF-symbols cannot be made real. We call such FFF-symbols "inherently complex." The examples we study lack a charge-conjugation symmetry and our results are therefore consistent with the converse of a statement proved in a companion work linking real FFF-symbols in braided fusion categories with the existence of a suitable charge-conjugation symmetry. We analyse the smallest-rank braided fusion categories we know of with inherently complex FFF-symbols: Rep(Z7⋊Z3){\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_7\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_3)Rep(Z7​⋊Z3​) and Rep(Z5⋊Z4){\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_5\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_4)Rep(Z5​⋊Z4​). Consequently, the corresponding Z(Rep(Z7⋊Z3))\mathcal Z({\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_7\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_3))Z(Rep(Z7​⋊Z3​)) and Z(Rep(Z5⋊Z4))\mathcal Z({\rm Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_5\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_4))Z(Rep(Z5​⋊Z4​)) anyon models also have inherently complex FFF-symbols. Our presentation connects these examples with recent results on classifying anyons beyond modular data.
FINDING: Anyon braiding provides non-Abelian statistics for topological quantum computation, with braid group representations forming the computational basis. | MATH: Braid group BnB_nBn​ generators σi\sigma_iσi​ satisfy σiσi+1σi=σi+1σiσi+1\sigma_i\sigma_{i+1}\sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1}\sigma_i\sigma_{i+1}σi​σi+1​σi​=σi+1​σi​σi+1​ (Yang–Baxter equation); non-Abelian anyons carry unitary braid matrices U(σi)U(\sigma_i)U(σi​) with U(σi)U(σi+1)U(σi)=U(σi+1)U(σi)U(σi+1)U(\sigma_i)U(\sigma_{i+1})U(\sigma_i) = U(\sigma_{i+1})U(\sigma_i)U(\sigma_{i+1})U(σi​)U(σi+1​)U(σi​)=U(σi+1​)U(σi​)U(σi+1​); Fibonacci anyons have fusion rule τ×τ=1+τ\tau \times \tau = 1 + \tauτ×τ=1+τ, yielding quantum dimension ϕ=(1+5)/2≈1.618\phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618ϕ=(1+5​)/2≈1.618 (golden ratio); topological protection arises from ground-state degeneracy on genus-ggg surfaces: dim⁡H=4g\dim \mathcal{H} = 4^gdimH=4g for toric code, or 2g2^g2g for Ising anyons. | CONNECTION: Fibonacci anyons' quantum dimension is *exactly* the golden ratio ϕ=1.618\phi = 1.618ϕ=1.618, and its inverse ϕ−1=0.618\phi^{-1} = 0.618ϕ−1=0.618 appears in braid fusion probabilities; the Yang–Baxter equation is a braided analogue of th Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
Abstract Given a discrete group, we consider planar diagrams where each edge is labeled with an element of the group, and vertices must obey the rule that multiplication of the edges incident on the vertex (in order) must yield the identity. The possible F-matrices for such a diagram are discussed and are known as 3-cocycles from the formalism of group cohomology. We discuss a simple example of building anyons from the ZN group. Noncommutative groups can be considered although they cannot describe a braided theory.
Abstract In this chapter we begin the detailed structure of anyon theories, or TQFTs. We introduce the concept of fusion and explain how it is related to the Hilbert space of the anyon systems. We emphasize the importance of locality as a principle for understanding anyons. Associativity is a strong constraint on possible particle fusion rules. As examples, we introduce both Fibonacci anyons and Ising anyons. We explain how the fusion rules of an anyon theory can be used to calculate the degeneracy of the ground state on arbitrary 2-manifolds.
FINDING: Non-Abelian anyon fusion algebras exhibit self-similarity that mirrors the braid group structure, enabling fault-tolerant topological quantum computation via braiding operations. MATH: - Braid group Bn B_n Bn​ generators σi \sigma_i σi​ satisfy σiσi+1σi=σi+1σiσi+1 \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} σi​σi+1​σi​=σi+1​σi​σi+1​ and σiσj=σjσi \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i σi​σj​=σj​σi​ for ∣i−j∣>1 |i-j|>1 ∣i−j∣>1. - Fusion algebra: ϕa×ϕb=∑cNabcϕc \phi_a \times \phi_b = \sum_c N_{ab}^c \phi_c ϕa​×ϕb​=∑c​Nabc​ϕc​, where Nabc N_{ab}^c Nabc​ are non-negative integers (fusion coefficients). For non-Abelian anyons, ∑cNabc>1 \sum_c N_{ab}^c > 1 ∑c​Nabc​>1 for some a,b a,b a,b. - Fibonacci anyon model: single nontrivial particle τ \tau τ with fusion rule τ×τ=1+τ \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau τ×τ=1+τ, leading to quantum dimension dτ=ϕ=(1+5)/2≈1.618 d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 dτ​=ϕ=(1+5​)/2≈1.618. - Braiding matrices yield phases eiθ e^{i\theta} eiθ with θ=2π/5,4π/5 \theta = 2\pi/5, 4\pi/5 θ=2π/5,4π/5 (related to golden angle 2π/ϕ2≈137.5∘ 2\pi/\phi^2 \approx 137.5^\circ 2π/ϕ2≈137.5∘). CONNECTION: - Fibonacci anyon quant Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Non-Abelian anyon fusion algebra exhibits self-similarity under braid group representations, enabling topological quantum computation via braiding operations. MATH: - Braid group Bn B_n Bn​ generators σi \sigma_i σi​ satisfy σiσi+1σi=σi+1σiσi+1 \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} σi​σi+1​σi​=σi+1​σi​σi+1​ and σiσj=σjσi \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i σi​σj​=σj​σi​ for ∣i−j∣>1 |i-j|>1 ∣i−j∣>1. - Hecke algebra relations: (σi−q1/2)(σi+q−1/2)=0 (\sigma_i - q^{1/2})(\sigma_i + q^{-1/2}) = 0 (σi​−q1/2)(σi​+q−1/2)=0, with q=e2πi/k q = e^{2\pi i/k} q=e2πi/k for SU(2)_k anyons. - Fusion rules: ϕa×ϕb=∑cNabcϕc \phi_a \times \phi_b = \sum_c N_{ab}^c \phi_c ϕa​×ϕb​=∑c​Nabc​ϕc​, where Nabc N_{ab}^c Nabc​ are non-negative integers (fusion coefficients). - Fibonacci anyon fusion: τ×τ=1+τ \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau τ×τ=1+τ, with quantum dimension dτ=ϕ=(1+5)/2≈1.618 d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 dτ​=ϕ=(1+5​)/2≈1.618. CONNECTION: - Fibonacci anyon quantum dimension dτ=ϕ=1.618 d_\tau = \phi = 1.618 dτ​=ϕ=1.618 (golden ratio). - Braid matrix eigenvalues for Fibonacci anyons: e±3πi/5 e^{\pm 3\pi i/5} e±3πi/5, related to golden ratio via \( 2\cos(3\pi/5) Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com