Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising optimization technique used to find global optimal solution of a combinatorial optimization problem by leveraging quantum fluctuations. In QA, the problem being solved is mapped onto the quantum processing unit (QPU) composed of qubits through a procedure called minor-embedding. The qubits are connected by a network of couplers, which determine the strength of the interactions between the qubits. The strength of the couplers that connect qubits within a chain is often referred to as the chain strength. The appropriate balance of chain strength is equally imperative in enabling the qubits to interact with one another in a way that is strong enough to obtain the optimal solution, but not excessively strong so as not to bias the original problem terms. To this end, we address the problem of identifying the optimal chain strength through the utilization of Path Integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) quantum simulation algorithm. The results indicate that our judicious choice of chain strength parameter facilitates enhancements in quantum annealer performance and solution quality, thereby paving the way for QA to compete with, or potentially outperform, classical optimization algorithms.
Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising optimization technique used to find global optimal solution of a combinatorial optimization problem by leveraging quantum fluctuations. In QA, the problem being solved is mapped onto the quantum processing unit (QPU) composed of qubits through a procedure called minor-embedding. The qubits are connected by a network of couplers, which determine the strength of the interactions between the qubits. The strength of the couplers that connect qubits within a chain is often referred to as the chain strength. The appropriate balance of chain strength is equally imperative in enabling the qubits to interact with one another in a way that is strong enough to obtain the optimal solution, but not excessively strong so as not to bias the original problem terms. To this end, we address the problem of identifying the optimal chain strength through the utilization of Path Integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) quantum simulation algorithm. The results indicate that our judicious choice of chain strength parameter facilitates enhancements in quantum annealer performance and solution quality, thereby paving the way for QA to compete with, or potentially outperform, classical optimization algorithms.
Critical decision-making issues in science, engineering, and industry are based on combinatorial optimization; however, its application is inherently limited by the NP-hard nature of the problem. A specialized paradigm of analogue quantum computing, quantum annealing (QA), has been proposed to solve these problems by encoding optimization problems into physical energy landscapes and solving them by quantum tunnelling systematically through exploration of solution space. This is a critical review that summarizes the current applications of quantum annealing to combinatorial optimization and includes a theoretical background, hardware designs, algorithm implementation strategies, encoding and embedding schemes, protocols to benchmark quantum annealing, areas of implementation, and links with the quantum algorithms implementation with gate-based hardware and classical solvers. We develop a unified framework, relating adiabatic quantum dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to modern flux-qubit annealers (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr topologies), and emergent architectures (Lechner-Hauke-Zoller systems, Rydberg atom platforms), and hybrids of quantum and classical computation. Through our analysis, we find that overhead in embedding and encoding is the largest determinant of the scalability and performance (this is not just the number of qubits). Minor embeddings also usually have a physical qubit count per logical variable of between 5 and 12 qubits, which limits effective problem capacity by 80-92% and, due to chain-breaking errors, compromises the quality of solutions.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
Quantum Annealing (QA) offers a promising framework for solving NP-hard optimization problems, but its effectiveness is constrained by the topology of the underlying quantum hardware. Solving an optimization problem P via QA involves a hardware-aware circuit compilation which requires representing P as a graph GP and embedding it into the hardware connectivity graph GQ that defines how qubits connect to each other in a QA-based quantum processing unit (QPU).
Minor Embedding (ME) is a possible operational form of this hardware-aware compilation. ME heuristically builds a map that associates each node of GP -- the logical variables of P -- to a chain of adjacent nodes in GQ by means of one of its minors, so that the arcs of GP are preserved as physical connections among qubits in GQ.
The static topology of hardwired qubits can clearly lead to inefficient compilations because GQ cannot be a clique, currently. We propose a methodology and a set of criteria to evaluate how the hardware topology GQ can negatively affect the embedded problem, thus making the quantum optimization more sensible to noise.
We evaluate the result of ME across two QPU topologies: Zephyr graphs (used in current D-Wave systems) and Havel-Hakimi graphs, which allow controlled variation of the average node degree. This enables us to study how the ratio `number of nodes/number of incident arcs per node' affects ME success rates to map GP into a minor of GQ.
Our findings, obtained through ME executed on classical, i.e. non-quantum, architectures, suggest that Havel-Hakimi-based topologies, on average, require shorter qubit chains in the minor of GP, exhibiting smoother scaling of the largest embeddable GP as the QPU size increases. These characteristics indicate their potential as alternative designs for QA-based QPUs.
Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization
Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising quantum computing paradigm for solving optimization problems. However, the performance of QA is often limited by issues such as slow convergence rates and sensitivity to parameter settings. This paper presents a novel optimization method designed to address these limitations. The approach introduces refined parameters and an adaptive strategy to enhance the algorithm's convergence speed and solution accuracy. We explore the application of this optimized QA method to complex problems, demonstrating its potential for improved performance. The core of the optimization lies in modifying the annealing schedule and incorporating a dynamic adjustment of the magnetic field strength, denoted as H(t), where t represents time. The objective function to be minimized is typically represented as E[s], where s is the state vector of the quantum annealer. We introduce a variance reduction technique, denoted as σ(t), which is dynamically adjusted based on the error estimates of the current state. The overall optimization process can be summarized as: minsE[s]subject todtdS=−β(t)E[s]−γ(t)H(t)s where β(t) is the annealing rate and γ(t) is the magnetic field strength. The adaptive strategy involves updating β(t) and γ(t) based on the error in the current solution, aiming to reduce the variance σ(t) and improve the convergence. The theoretical analysis suggests that this approach can significantly reduce the computational cost and improve the solution quality compared to traditional QA methods. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of different parameter settings on the algorithm's performance, highlighting the importance of careful tuning for optimal results. The results demonstrate a notable improvement in solution quality and convergence speed across various benchmark problems.
We benchmark Quantum Annealing (QA) vs. Simulated Annealing (SA) with a focus on the impact of the embedding of problems onto the different topologies of the D-Wave quantum annealers. The series of problems we study are especially designed instances of the maximum cardinality matching problem that are easy to solve classically but difficult for SA and, as found experimentally, not easy for QA either. In addition to using several D-Wave processors, we simulate the QA process by numerically solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We find that the embedded problems can be significantly more difficult than the unembedded problems, and some parameters, such as the chain strength, can be very impactful for finding the optimal solution. Thus, finding a good embedding and optimal parameter values can improve the results considerably. Interestingly, we find that although SA succeeds for the unembedded problems, the SA results obtained for the embedded version scale quite poorly in comparison with what we can achieve on the D-Wave quantum annealers.