Abstract In this short introductory chapter, the basics of the measurement problem are presented. On the one hand we have the continuous dynamics as embodied in Schrödinger’s Equation which describes the evolution of the wave-function. On the other, we have the discontinuous ‘collapse’ of that wave-function to give a definite outcome out of all the possible options. The ‘usual story’ presents this problem in the context of a standard history of the development of quantum theory that is entwined with philosophical reflections on its foundations. Both sets of histories are contested in what follows and the chapter concludes by setting out the central claims of the rest of the book.
Abstract In this short introductory chapter, the basics of the measurement problem are presented. On the one hand we have the continuous dynamics as embodied in Schrödinger’s Equation which describes the evolution of the wave-function. On the other, we have the discontinuous ‘collapse’ of that wave-function to give a definite outcome out of all the possible options. The ‘usual story’ presents this problem in the context of a standard history of the development of quantum theory that is entwined with philosophical reflections on its foundations. Both sets of histories are contested in what follows and the chapter concludes by setting out the central claims of the rest of the book.
This is the first single volume about the collapse theories of quantum mechanics, which is becoming a very active field of research in both physics and philosophy. In standard quantum mechanics, it is postulated that when the wave function of a quantum system is measured, it no longer follows the Schrödinger equation, but instantaneously and randomly collapses to one of the wave functions that correspond to definite measurement results. However, why and how a definite measurement result appears is unknown. A promising solution to this problem are collapse theories in which the collapse of the wave function is spontaneous and dynamical. Chapters written by distinguished physicists and philosophers of physics discuss the origin and implications of wave-function collapse, the controversies around collapse models and their ontologies, and new arguments for the reality of wave function collapse. This is an invaluable resource for students and researchers interested in the philosophy of physics and foundations of quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics famously posits two distinct evolution rules for the state of a system: a deterministic, unitary time evolution under the Schr¨odinger equation, and a probabilistic “collapse” of the wavefunction upon measurement as dictated by the Born rule. The apparent inconsistency of these two dynamical laws – one continuous and one discontinuous – constitutes the quantum measurement problem. This foundational problem, which underlies the emergence of definite outcomes from quantum superpositions, has persisted since the theory’s inception. In this review, we present a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the measurement problem and survey the leading approaches that seek to resolve or circumvent it. We begin by formulating the measurement problem and its conceptual challenges. We then discuss in detail the major interpretations of quantum mechanics and theoretical frameworks addressing the problem: the Copenhagen interpretation, Everett’s many-worlds interpretation, de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory, objective collapse models, the role of decoherence and environment-induced superselection, and epistemic approaches such as QBism. For each interpretation, we describe the core principles and mathematical formalism, assessing how (and whether) it attempts to solve the measurement problem. We also review modern developments and experiments relevant to quantum measurements, including tests of Bell inequalities, observations of decoherence and macroscopic superpositions, weak measurements and quantum eraser experiments, and thought experiments ‘a la Wigner’s friend. We highlight how these results inform the ongoing debate. Finally, we discuss open problems and challenges that remain in fully resolving the measurement problem.
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics originates in the inability of the Schrödinger equation to predict definite outcomes of measurements. This is due to the lack of objectivity of the eigenstates of the measuring apparatus. Such objectivity can be achieved if a unified realist conceptual framework can be formulated in terms of wave functions and operators acting on them for both the quantum and classical domains. Such a framework was proposed and an equation for the wave function (13, 14) smoothly interpolates between the quantum and classical limits. The arguments leading to the equation are clarified in this paper, and the theory is developed further. The measurement problem in quantum mechanics is then briefly reviewed and re-examined from the point of view of this theory, and it is shown how the classical limit of the wave function of the measuring apparatus leads to a natural solution of the problem of definite measurement outcomes without the need for either collapse or pragmatic thermodynamic arguments. This is consistent with Bohr's emphasis on the primacy of classical concepts and classical measuring devices. Possible tests of the theory using low-dimensional systems such as quantum dots are indicated.
Abstract This book describes one approach to resolving the ‘measurement problem’ of standard quantum theory (SQT), by changing the Schrodinger equation’s evolution of the wave function. The wave function of SQT does not describe reality. For example, the wave function corresponding to a completed experiment is the sum of terms describing the different experimental outcomes whereas one of these outcomes is what appears in Nature, The rules of SQT respond to this deficiency by imposing an ill-defined ‘collapse postulate.’ The prior smooth evolution of the wave function according to Schrodinger’s equation is replaced by an abrupt ‘jump’ to one of the outcomes. When, why, how are unanswered questions. I have added a term to Schrodinger’s equation, obtaining a theory (which I named the ‘Continuous Spontaneous Localization’ theory, or CSL) that answers these questions. The term has a random field in it: each field makes the sum of terms evolve to one of the terms. The collection of all possible fields produces the (Born rule) probabilistic predictions of SQT. Thus, CSL does something SQT does not: it describes the occurrence of events. But, it is a different theory than SQT, so it predicts different results for some carefully crafted experiments. CSL has now existed for over three decades. While no experiment as yet has proven CSL true, no experiment has conflicted with it either. In this book I have aimed to give a clear exposition of CSL and its consequences, accessible to anyone who has studied SQT.
Quantum mechanics is our most successful physical theory. It predicts the behavior of atoms, molecules, and light to ten decimal places. No experiment has ever contradicted it. It also contains a crack at its foundation. The theory’s central equation—the Schrodinger equation—describes a smooth, continuous, perfectly predictable evolution of the quantum state. But whenever anyone performs a measurement, they get a single, definite result. Which result they get appears to be random. The transition from smooth evolution to random outcome is called the “collapse of the wavefunction,” and after nearly a century of analysis, there is no agreed-upon explanation for what causes it, when it occurs, or whether it occurs at all. This is the measurement problem. The measurement problem is not a minor puzzle at the margins of the theory. It is a failure to explain the most basic operation in science: looking at the result of an experiment. Around it cluster other puzzles. Light behaves like a wave in some experiments and like a particle in others—two contradictory descriptions. Two particles that have interacted remain correlated across arbitrary distances, as though communicating faster than light. The probabilities that govern measurement outcomes appear as a postulate—the Born rule—inserted by hand with no deeper justification. And the theory offers no unified picture of reality: quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the standard model of particle physics speak incompatible mathematical languages. A century of effort has produced many interpretations of quantum mechanics. Copenhagen. Many-worlds. De Broglie-Bohm. Objective collapse. Quantum Bayesianism. None has achieved consensus. The measurement problem remains. This document proposes that the source of these puzzles is not quantum mechanics itself. It is a single, invisible assumption made at the very beginning of the theory in 1900—an assumption so deeply embedded that nobody noticed they were making it. Change that assumption, and the puzzles do not get solved. They dissolve. They stop being puzzles. They become predictable consequences of geometry.
There is a particular kind of dissatisfaction that a physicist feels when they first encounter the measurement problem properly. Not the pedagogical version, wherethe textbook waves its hand and says 'and then the wavefunction collapses' andmoves swiftly on to the next topic. The real version. The version where you sit with the Schrodinger equation long enough to realize that nothing in it — not one term, not one symbol — implies or permits or even suggests a collapse. The equation evolves states unitarily. It has been doing so for a hundred years. And yet every experiment produces a definite outcome. Something happens at measurement. Something that the theory does not describe. That gap is the measurement problem, and it has been papered over with an astonishing variety of philosophical plasters: the Copenhagen interpretation's studied vagueness about the quantum-classical boundary; the many-worlds proliferation of realities too extravagant to take literally; the Bohmian ghost-wave that somehow knows where its particle is without looking; the GRW stochastic collapses that add new physics to plug a conceptual hole. Each of these is intelligent. None of them is satisfying. Each solves the problem by paying a price that a careful physicist should be unwilling to pay. This monograph proposes a different path. It begins with a question that almost nobody asks: what if the measurement problem is not about what happens to thefuture state, but about what happens to the past? What if the act of measurement does not merely update our predictions about what comes next, but retroactively assigns a consistent history to what came before?