Abstract In this chapter the quantification of entanglement is discussed. Beginning with the pure-state entanglement measure called the entropy of entanglement, we discuss the paradigm of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) and its relation to majorization via Nielsen’s majorization theorem. We then turn to the asymptotic setting and discuss the formation and distillation of entanglement and the related entanglement measures: entanglement cost and distillable entanglement, and we examine the notions of distillability and bound entanglement. This brings us to a more general discussion of entanglement measures and monotones, and their desired properties, during which we present the entanglement of formation and concurrence, squashed entanglement, as well as the tangle and its relation to monogamy of entanglement, but also quantities like the relative entropy of entanglement, the Hilbert-Schmidt measure, and the (logarithmic) negativity. Finally we turn to the construction of entanglement witnesses and their geometric interpretation via the Bertlmann-Narnhofer-Thirring theorem
Abstract In this chapter the quantification of entanglement is discussed. Beginning with the pure-state entanglement measure called the entropy of entanglement, we discuss the paradigm of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) and its relation to majorization via Nielsen’s majorization theorem. We then turn to the asymptotic setting and discuss the formation and distillation of entanglement and the related entanglement measures: entanglement cost and distillable entanglement, and we examine the notions of distillability and bound entanglement. This brings us to a more general discussion of entanglement measures and monotones, and their desired properties, during which we present the entanglement of formation and concurrence, squashed entanglement, as well as the tangle and its relation to monogamy of entanglement, but also quantities like the relative entropy of entanglement, the Hilbert-Schmidt measure, and the (logarithmic) negativity. Finally we turn to the construction of entanglement witnesses and their geometric interpretation via the Bertlmann-Narnhofer-Thirring theorem
The focal point of this thesis is strongly based on quantum entanglement within Quantum Information Science. We provide an indepth analysis of entanglement quantification in both bipartite and multipartite quantum systems, with an emphasis on many-body entanglement. We examine the definitions of entanglement, introduce several entanglement measures, and examine the challenges in expanding these measures to multipartite scenarios. For bipartite systems, we detail entropy-based measures such as von Neumann and Rényi entropies, the entanglement spectrum and important algebraic metrics such as negativity and concurrence. We then elaborate on multipartite entanglement, introducing modern measures and detection techniques including geometric and global entanglement measurements, generalised multipartite concurrence, multipartite negativity, fidelity-based entanglement benchmarks, and entanglement witnesses. Some examples include Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ), and the W states to illustrate the distinction between biseparable and truly multi-partite-entangled states, as well as the SLOCC classification of families of entangled states. We also briefly introduce practical ways of measuring entanglement, such as the SWAP test, quantum state tomography for experimental estimation of entanglement and consequently randomised measurements. We apply these measures to specific quantum states (GHZ, W , graph states, and random states), analysing how entanglement evolves under operations and how different metrics capture distinct features of multi-qubit entanglement. Finally, we conclude with a summary of findings, a discussion of current limitations such as scalability of measures. The thesis is organised into five chapters: Introduction, Entanglement, Multipartite Entanglement Measures, Negativity vs. Three-Tangle, and Conclusion.
This dissertation will serve as an introduction to entanglement quantification, containing highly detailed proofs ensuring solid understanding of the subject. Specifically, we will review the properties of entanglement that should be satisfied by a "good" entanglement measure. Then we will have a look at some of the propositions of the entanglement measures that have been made over the years. We will review in greater detail the entanglement of formation. We will discuss the proposals of the mathematical representations of another property of entanglement, called monogamy. We will introduce some definitions of monogamous entanglement measures that were proposed and compare them. As an original observation of mine (page 28), I will also show that "Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?" (arXiv:1604.02189) has already developed most of what is necessary to prove that the entanglement of formation and the regularised entropy of entanglement are monogamous entanglement measures in the sense of the definition that was given in "Monogamy of entanglement without inequalities" (arXiv:1710.03295).
The mysterious nature of entanglement, one of the most prominent exquisitely quantum phenomena, is reflected in its intricate operational structure, with a hierarchy of classes of free operations that enable its manipulation at different levels of effectiveness. Here we use the class of 'flower states', parametrised by their (even) local dimension 2k, to shine light on some aspects of this varied landscape. We compute all the main entanglement measures for flower states, uncovering a large gap between all forms of distillable entanglement, equal to 1 ebit independently of the local dimension, and the entanglement cost under local operations and classical communication (LOCC), known to be equal to log(2k). Even under the strictly more powerful class of non-entangling (NE) operations, we show that their cost is still equal to log(1+k), only about an ebit less than for LOCCs. This result, which we prove by calculating the recently introduced tempered entanglement negativity for these states, demonstrates the largest known 'irreversibility gap', i.e. the difference between distillable entanglement and entanglement cost, under NE operations, equal to Θ(21logd), with d being the local dimension. A notable consequence is that the celebrated squashed entanglement is not a monotone under NE operations. Finally, we compute the exact cost under LOCC operations for flower states; this is given by the Schmidt number, which turns out to be additive over multiple copies and equal to minr∣klog(r+rk); for prime k this reduces to log(k+1), about twice the standard LOCC cost. These last results leverage the uncertainty relations over cyclic groups proved by Tao and Meshulam.
The unextendibility or monogamy of entangled states is a key property of quantum entanglement. Unlike conventional ways of expressing entanglement monogamy via entanglement measure inequalities, we develop a state-dependent resource theory to quantify the unextendibility of bipartite entangled states. First, we introduce a family of entanglement measures called unextendible entanglement. Given a bipartite state ρAB, the key idea behind these measures is to minimize a divergence between ρABand any possibly reduced state ρAB' of an extension ρABB' of ρAB. These measures are intuitively motivated by the fact that the more a bipartite state is entangled, the less each of its individual systems can be entangled with a third party. Second, we show that the unextendible entanglement is an entanglement monotone under two-extendible operations, which include local operations and one-way classical communication as a special case. Unextendible entanglement has several other desirable properties, including normalization and faithfulness. As applications, we show that the unextendible entanglement provides efficiently computable benchmarks for the rate of perfect entanglement distillation, as well as for the overhead of entanglement distillation.
Chapter 13 delves into the complex terrain of mixed-state entanglement, extending the discourse from pure-state entanglement to encompass the broader and more practical scenarios encountered in quantum systems. The chapter systematically explores the detection of entanglement in mixed states, introducing criteria and methods such as the Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) criterion and entanglement witnesses, which serve as diagnostic tools for identifying entanglement in a mixed quantum state. Furthermore, it addresses the quantification of entanglement in mixed states, discussing various measures like entanglement cost and distillable entanglement. These concepts highlight the operational aspects of entanglement, including its creation and extraction, within mixed-state frameworks. The chapter also introduces the notion of entanglement conversion distances, providing a quantitative approach to understanding the transformations between different entangled states.
A complete chapter on quantum entanglement measures and detection of entanglement is given because there are a wide variety of entanglement measures for pure and mixed states which are used very often. The interesting feature of these routines is the fact that, these operations can be done between any random set of qubits not necessarily contiguous qubits. Key recipes to perform operations like partial tracing and partial transpose are disscussed in detail. After that, it was decided to devote several routines to calculate the entanglement measures like concurrence and its variants, von Neumann entropy, block entropy, Renyi entropy, Q measure, negativity and log negativity, entanglement spectrum and residual entanglement (three tangle). Last but not least, certain entanglement detection procedures like Positive Partial Transpose (the Peres-Horodecki criteria) and the reduction criteria are also explained via examples.