Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Renormalization Approach For Disordered Electron Systems

Hiroshi Kamimura, Hideo Aoki

Published Mar 8, 1990• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract We have seen that disordered systems give rise to a host of interesting effects related to the localization of states. Thus, from the outset we have explicitly to take account of the localization in the theoretical framework, which makes computer experiments on finite systems an important first-principles method. This situation immediately poses several essential questions, such as: (i) how can the properties of macroscopic systems be deduced from the results for finite systems; and (ii) how can the concept of Anderson localization be extended to disordered systems with electron-electron interactions in a numerical model in which disorder and electron correlation are treated on an equal footing? In this chapter we address these questions. In this section we introduce the concept of renormalization for disordered systems. Specifically, we examine real-space renormalization schemes.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198520238.003.0006

Related papers

Real-space renormalization group approach to the Anderson model

Eamonn A. Campbell

Many of the most interesting electronic behaviours currently being studied are associated with strong correlations. In addition, many of these materials are disordered either intrinsically or due to doping. Solving interacting systems exactly is extremely computationally expensive, and approximate techniques developed for strongly correlated systems are not easily adapted to include disorder. As a non-interacting disordered model, it makes sense to consider the Anderson model as a first step in developing an approximate method of solution to the interacting and disordered Anderson-Hubbard model. Our renormalization group (RG) approach is modeled on that proposed by Johri and Bhatt [23]. We found an error in their work which we have corrected in our procedure. After testing the execution of the RG, we benchmarked the density of states and inverse participation ratio results against exact diagonalization. Our approach is significantly faster than exact diagonalization and is most accurate in the limit of strong disorder. Author Keywords: disorder, localization, real-space renormalization, strong correlations

Theory of Computing Systems•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Dual Fermion Approach to Disordered Correlated Systems

Patrick Haase

Disorder is ubiquitous in real materials and influences the physical properties like the conductivity to varying degrees. \nIf electron-electron interactions are strong, theoretical and numerical treatment of these systems becomes challenging. In this thesis a numerical approach is developed to address these systems, \ntreating both interactions and disorder on equal footing. \nThe approach is based on the dual fermion approach for interacting systems developed by Rubtsov et al. \nTerletska et al. applied the ideas of the dual fermion approach to disordered non-interacting systems. In this approach, the replica trick is used to integrate out the disorder in favor of an effective electron-electron interaction. \nWe extended the approach from Terletska et al. to treat disordered interacting systems. \n \nDual Fermions allow to take into account non-local fluctuations by means of a perturbative expansion around an impurity problem. The impurity reference system is determined self-consistently, analogously to the dynamical mean-field \ntheory. \nThe perturbative expansion is expected to yield good results for small and large values of interaction strength and disorder. A priori, it is not clear what to expect for intermediate values, \nbut experience shows that oftentimes good results are obtained for this region. \n \nAn advantage of the dual fermion approach is that there is no sign-problem for a single orbital model if quantum Monte Carlo is used to solve the interacting reference system. \nAdditionally, perturbation theory is usually numerically much cheaper than fully solving an interacting lattice or cluster problem. \nThus, the dual fermion approach allows to address regions of parameter space that are not accessible to lattice quantum Monte Carlo calculations or cluster extension of dynamical mean-field theory. \nCluster extensions of the dynamical mean-field theory are for example the dynamical cluster approximation or the cellular dynamical mean-field theory. \n \nThe new approach is benchmarked with respect to the Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model. The Anderson-Hubbard model is the main application. \nFor both models, the algorithm is tested in one dimension for the single particle Green function and compared to the dynamical cluster approximation to estimate the quality of the results. \nThe Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model is studied further in two dimensions and the phase diagram on the disorder-interaction plane is calculated from both the single particle Green function and the dc conductivity. \n \nFor the Anderson-Hubbard model, the antiferromagnetic phase transition, the Mott transition and the Anderson transition are investigated in three dimensions. The dynamical mean-field theory results are \nqualitatively confirmed for the most part. Quantitative corrections are in agreement with dynamical cluster approximation results, thus confirming the validity of the results. \nWe found a qualitative difference between the dual fermion approach and dynamical mean-field theory for the temperature dependence of the hysteresis of the double occupancy. The dual fermion result \nshows a decreasing lower critical interaction strength for decreasing temperature, which is in contrast with the dynamical mean-field result that shows an increase of the lower critical interaction strength. \nThis behavior happens for small temperatures that are not accessible using for example the dynamical cluster approximation, thus highlighting the usefulness of the dual fermion approach. \nWe found this behavior for all values of the disorder that we considered.

•Nov 5, 2015•0 citations

Dual Fermion Approach to Disordered Correlated Systems

Patrick Haase

Disorder is ubiquitous in real materials and influences the physical properties like the conductivity to varying degrees. If electron-electron interactions are strong, theoretical and numerical treatment of these systems becomes challenging. In this thesis a numerical approach is developed to address these systems, treating both interactions and disorder on equal footing. The approach is based on the dual fermion approach for interacting systems developed by Rubtsov et al. Terletska et al. applied the ideas of the dual fermion approach to disordered non-interacting systems. In this approach, the replica trick is used to integrate out the disorder in favor of an effective electron-electron interaction. We extended the approach from Terletska et al. to treat disordered interacting systems. Dual Fermions allow to take into account non-local fluctuations by means of a perturbative expansion around an impurity problem. The impurity reference system is determined self-consistently, analogously to the dynamical mean-field theory. The perturbative expansion is expected to yield good results for small and large values of interaction strength and disorder. A priori, it is not clear what to expect for intermediate values, but experience shows that oftentimes good results are obtained for this region. An advantage of the dual fermion approach is that there is no sign-problem for a single orbital model if quantum Monte Carlo is used to solve the interacting reference system. Additionally, perturbation theory is usually numerically much cheaper than fully solving an interacting lattice or cluster problem. Thus, the dual fermion approach allows to address regions of parameter space that are not accessible to lattice quantum Monte Carlo calculations or cluster extension of dynamical mean-field theory. Cluster extensions of the dynamical mean-field theory are for example the dynamical cluster approximation or the cellular dynamical mean-field theory. The new approach is benchmarked with respect to the Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model. The Anderson-Hubbard model is the main application. For both models, the algorithm is tested in one dimension for the single particle Green function and compared to the dynamical cluster approximation to estimate the quality of the results. The Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model is studied further in two dimensions and the phase diagram on the disorder-interaction plane is calculated from both the single particle Green function and the dc conductivity. For the Anderson-Hubbard model, the antiferromagnetic phase transition, the Mott transition and the Anderson transition are investigated in three dimensions. The dynamical mean-field theory results are qualitatively confirmed for the most part. Quantitative corrections are in agreement with dynamical cluster approximation results, thus confirming the validity of the results. We found a qualitative difference between the dual fermion approach and dynamical mean-field theory for the temperature dependence of the hysteresis of the double occupancy. The dual fermion result shows a decreasing lower critical interaction strength for decreasing temperature, which is in contrast with the dynamical mean-field result that shows an increase of the lower critical interaction strength. This behavior happens for small temperatures that are not accessible using for example the dynamical cluster approximation, thus highlighting the usefulness of the dual fermion approach. We found this behavior for all values of the disorder that we considered.

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

From the Preface to the first edition

Subir Sachdev A

The past decade has seen a substantial rejuvenation of interest in the study of quantum phase transitions, driven by experiments on cuprate superconductors, heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related compounds. Although quantum phase transitions in simple spin systems, like the Ising model in a transverse field, were studied in the early 1970s, much of the subsequent theoretical work examined a particular example: the metal–insulator transition. While this is a subject of considerable experimental importance, the greatest theoretical progress was made for the case of the Anderson transition of non-interacting electrons, which is driven by localization of the electronic states in the presence of a random potential. The critical properties of this transition of noninteracting electrons constituted the primary basis upon which most condensed matter physicists have formed their intuition on the behavior of the systems near a quantum phase transition. However, it is clear that strong electronic interactions play a crucial role in the systems of current interest noted earlier, and simple paradigms for the behavior of such systems near quantum critical points are not widely known. It is the purpose of this book to move interactions to center stage by describing and classifying the physical properties of the simplest interacting systems undergoing a quantum phase transition. The effects of disorder will be neglected for the most part but will be considered in the concluding chapters. Our focus will be on the dynamical properties of such systems at nonzero temperature, and it will become apparent that these differ substantially from the noninteracting case.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 7, 2011•0 citations

Anderson localization versus charge-density-wave formation in disordered electron systems

Satoshi Nishimoto, Satoshi Ejima, Holger Fehske

We study the interplay of disorder and interaction effects including bosonic degrees of freedom in the framework of a generic one-dimensional transport model: the Anderson-Edwards model. Using the density-matrix-renormalization group technique, we extract the localization length and the renormalization of the Tomonaga-Luttinger-liquid parameter from the charge-structure factor by a elaborate sample-average finite-size scaling procedure. The properties of the Anderson localized state can be described in terms of scaling relations of the metallic phase without disorder. We analyze how disorder competes with the charge-density-wave correlations triggered by the bosons and give evidence that disorder will destroy the long-range charge-ordered state.

arXiv:1210.8142•Physical Review B•Jan 18, 2013•5 citations

Real-space Mott-Anderson electron localization with long-range interactions

Antoine Marie, Derk Pieter Kooi, Juri Grossi +4 more

Electrons that are delocalized in space because of quantum effects can become localized by an external disordered potential (Anderson localization) or by their mutual Coulomb repulsion (Mott/Wigner localization). A simple model addresses what happens when both effects are present, how to quantify the degree of localization, and whether approximate methods can capture the relevant physics.

Physical Review Research•Dec 15, 2022•8 citations
Abstract We have seen that disordered systems give rise to a host of interesting effects related to the localization of states. Thus, from the outset we have explicitly to take account of the localization in the theoretical framework, which makes computer experiments on finite systems an important first-principles method. This situation immediately poses several essential questions, such as: (i) how can the properties of macroscopic systems be deduced from the results for finite systems; and (ii) how can the concept of Anderson localization be extended to disordered systems with electron-electron interactions in a numerical model in which disorder and electron correlation are treated on an equal footing? In this chapter we address these questions. In this section we introduce the concept of renormalization for disordered systems. Specifically, we examine real-space renormalization schemes.
Many of the most interesting electronic behaviours currently being studied are associated with strong correlations. In addition, many of these materials are disordered either intrinsically or due to doping. Solving interacting systems exactly is extremely computationally expensive, and approximate techniques developed for strongly correlated systems are not easily adapted to include disorder. As a non-interacting disordered model, it makes sense to consider the Anderson model as a first step in developing an approximate method of solution to the interacting and disordered Anderson-Hubbard model. Our renormalization group (RG) approach is modeled on that proposed by Johri and Bhatt [23]. We found an error in their work which we have corrected in our procedure. After testing the execution of the RG, we benchmarked the density of states and inverse participation ratio results against exact diagonalization. Our approach is significantly faster than exact diagonalization and is most accurate in the limit of strong disorder. Author Keywords: disorder, localization, real-space renormalization, strong correlations
Disorder is ubiquitous in real materials and influences the physical properties like the conductivity to varying degrees. \nIf electron-electron interactions are strong, theoretical and numerical treatment of these systems becomes challenging. In this thesis a numerical approach is developed to address these systems, \ntreating both interactions and disorder on equal footing. \nThe approach is based on the dual fermion approach for interacting systems developed by Rubtsov et al. \nTerletska et al. applied the ideas of the dual fermion approach to disordered non-interacting systems. In this approach, the replica trick is used to integrate out the disorder in favor of an effective electron-electron interaction. \nWe extended the approach from Terletska et al. to treat disordered interacting systems. \n \nDual Fermions allow to take into account non-local fluctuations by means of a perturbative expansion around an impurity problem. The impurity reference system is determined self-consistently, analogously to the dynamical mean-field \ntheory. \nThe perturbative expansion is expected to yield good results for small and large values of interaction strength and disorder. A priori, it is not clear what to expect for intermediate values, \nbut experience shows that oftentimes good results are obtained for this region. \n \nAn advantage of the dual fermion approach is that there is no sign-problem for a single orbital model if quantum Monte Carlo is used to solve the interacting reference system. \nAdditionally, perturbation theory is usually numerically much cheaper than fully solving an interacting lattice or cluster problem. \nThus, the dual fermion approach allows to address regions of parameter space that are not accessible to lattice quantum Monte Carlo calculations or cluster extension of dynamical mean-field theory. \nCluster extensions of the dynamical mean-field theory are for example the dynamical cluster approximation or the cellular dynamical mean-field theory. \n \nThe new approach is benchmarked with respect to the Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model. The Anderson-Hubbard model is the main application. \nFor both models, the algorithm is tested in one dimension for the single particle Green function and compared to the dynamical cluster approximation to estimate the quality of the results. \nThe Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model is studied further in two dimensions and the phase diagram on the disorder-interaction plane is calculated from both the single particle Green function and the dc conductivity. \n \nFor the Anderson-Hubbard model, the antiferromagnetic phase transition, the Mott transition and the Anderson transition are investigated in three dimensions. The dynamical mean-field theory results are \nqualitatively confirmed for the most part. Quantitative corrections are in agreement with dynamical cluster approximation results, thus confirming the validity of the results. \nWe found a qualitative difference between the dual fermion approach and dynamical mean-field theory for the temperature dependence of the hysteresis of the double occupancy. The dual fermion result \nshows a decreasing lower critical interaction strength for decreasing temperature, which is in contrast with the dynamical mean-field result that shows an increase of the lower critical interaction strength. \nThis behavior happens for small temperatures that are not accessible using for example the dynamical cluster approximation, thus highlighting the usefulness of the dual fermion approach. \nWe found this behavior for all values of the disorder that we considered.
Disorder is ubiquitous in real materials and influences the physical properties like the conductivity to varying degrees. If electron-electron interactions are strong, theoretical and numerical treatment of these systems becomes challenging. In this thesis a numerical approach is developed to address these systems, treating both interactions and disorder on equal footing. The approach is based on the dual fermion approach for interacting systems developed by Rubtsov et al. Terletska et al. applied the ideas of the dual fermion approach to disordered non-interacting systems. In this approach, the replica trick is used to integrate out the disorder in favor of an effective electron-electron interaction. We extended the approach from Terletska et al. to treat disordered interacting systems. Dual Fermions allow to take into account non-local fluctuations by means of a perturbative expansion around an impurity problem. The impurity reference system is determined self-consistently, analogously to the dynamical mean-field theory. The perturbative expansion is expected to yield good results for small and large values of interaction strength and disorder. A priori, it is not clear what to expect for intermediate values, but experience shows that oftentimes good results are obtained for this region. An advantage of the dual fermion approach is that there is no sign-problem for a single orbital model if quantum Monte Carlo is used to solve the interacting reference system. Additionally, perturbation theory is usually numerically much cheaper than fully solving an interacting lattice or cluster problem. Thus, the dual fermion approach allows to address regions of parameter space that are not accessible to lattice quantum Monte Carlo calculations or cluster extension of dynamical mean-field theory. Cluster extensions of the dynamical mean-field theory are for example the dynamical cluster approximation or the cellular dynamical mean-field theory. The new approach is benchmarked with respect to the Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model. The Anderson-Hubbard model is the main application. For both models, the algorithm is tested in one dimension for the single particle Green function and compared to the dynamical cluster approximation to estimate the quality of the results. The Anderson-Falicov-Kimball model is studied further in two dimensions and the phase diagram on the disorder-interaction plane is calculated from both the single particle Green function and the dc conductivity. For the Anderson-Hubbard model, the antiferromagnetic phase transition, the Mott transition and the Anderson transition are investigated in three dimensions. The dynamical mean-field theory results are qualitatively confirmed for the most part. Quantitative corrections are in agreement with dynamical cluster approximation results, thus confirming the validity of the results. We found a qualitative difference between the dual fermion approach and dynamical mean-field theory for the temperature dependence of the hysteresis of the double occupancy. The dual fermion result shows a decreasing lower critical interaction strength for decreasing temperature, which is in contrast with the dynamical mean-field result that shows an increase of the lower critical interaction strength. This behavior happens for small temperatures that are not accessible using for example the dynamical cluster approximation, thus highlighting the usefulness of the dual fermion approach. We found this behavior for all values of the disorder that we considered.
The past decade has seen a substantial rejuvenation of interest in the study of quantum phase transitions, driven by experiments on cuprate superconductors, heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related compounds. Although quantum phase transitions in simple spin systems, like the Ising model in a transverse field, were studied in the early 1970s, much of the subsequent theoretical work examined a particular example: the metal–insulator transition. While this is a subject of considerable experimental importance, the greatest theoretical progress was made for the case of the Anderson transition of non-interacting electrons, which is driven by localization of the electronic states in the presence of a random potential. The critical properties of this transition of noninteracting electrons constituted the primary basis upon which most condensed matter physicists have formed their intuition on the behavior of the systems near a quantum phase transition. However, it is clear that strong electronic interactions play a crucial role in the systems of current interest noted earlier, and simple paradigms for the behavior of such systems near quantum critical points are not widely known. It is the purpose of this book to move interactions to center stage by describing and classifying the physical properties of the simplest interacting systems undergoing a quantum phase transition. The effects of disorder will be neglected for the most part but will be considered in the concluding chapters. Our focus will be on the dynamical properties of such systems at nonzero temperature, and it will become apparent that these differ substantially from the noninteracting case.
We study the interplay of disorder and interaction effects including bosonic degrees of freedom in the framework of a generic one-dimensional transport model: the Anderson-Edwards model. Using the density-matrix-renormalization group technique, we extract the localization length and the renormalization of the Tomonaga-Luttinger-liquid parameter from the charge-structure factor by a elaborate sample-average finite-size scaling procedure. The properties of the Anderson localized state can be described in terms of scaling relations of the metallic phase without disorder. We analyze how disorder competes with the charge-density-wave correlations triggered by the bosons and give evidence that disorder will destroy the long-range charge-ordered state.