Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Iterative perturbation theory

Keith Hannabuss

Published Mar 20, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The Rayleigh-Schrodinger theory described in the preceding chapter is by no means the only approach to stationary perturbation theory, nor is it usually the most powerful. As one of many possible alternatives we shall now describe an iterative procedure for approximating stationary states, sometimes called Wigner-Brillouin perturbation theory, which resembles the Feynman-Dyson method of Section 11.3.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198537946.003.0013

Related papers

A simple derivation of the series in perturbation theory

Luis Laín, Alicia Torre

A simple algorithm to derive the Brillouin-Wigner and the Rayleigh-Schrodinger series in time-independent perturbation theory is presented. The method provides a better understanding of the normalisation treatment of the perturbed wavefunctions and it establishes a clear relationship between the Brillouin-Wigner and Rayleigh-Schrodinger series.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1987•3 citations

Convergent Schrödinger Perturbation Theory

Gerald Speisman

A formulation of Schr\"odinger perturbation theory is developed that gives a unified treatment of non-degenerate and degenerate cases, is unique, and has a nonzero radius of convergence under very general conditions. Two alternative procedures are given for finding perturbed eigenvectors, one of which is simpler for the nondegenerate case or for small finite degeneracy, the other simpler for infinite or large finite degeneracy. The low-order terms in the perturbation expansions of quantities used in applications are given. The perturbation theory formulated in this paper has the following advantages over the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories: (i) When the convergence criterion is satisfied, bounds on the error made in replacing an appropriate infinite perturbation series by its first $n$ terms can be obtained. (ii) For the case of degeneracy, the conventional Schr\"odinger perturbation theory can break down under conditions to which the convergence of the perturbation theory developed in this paper are insensitive. (iii) There is no implicit dependence on the eigenvalue, such as appears in the Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory. (iv) For the case of degeneracy, statistical information about the distribution of certain eigenvalues can be obtained without finding the individual eigenvalues. (v) The theory is applicable to a wider class of problems than the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories.

Physical Review•Aug 15, 1957•28 citations

Quantum-mechanical perturbation theory

John P. Killingbeck

Modern computers have made possible the evaluation of higher order terms of perturbation series. Apart from the empirical work involving numerical calculations, much formal mathematical work has been done on the convergence properties of perturbation series and of Pade approximants which represent them. Some of the modern work in perturbation theory is reviewed in the context of traditional results from the theory of real and complex variables. The two major versions of time-independent perturbation theory, the Rayleigh-Schrodinger (RS) and Brillouin-Wigner (BW) theories, are compared and contrasted, and the alternative techniques for evaluating the terms in the energy series are discussed. The sum-over-states method, the differential equation method and the variational principle method are treated, with emphasis on their inter-relations.

Reports on Progress in Physics•Sep 1, 1977•163 citations

- Approximation Methods I: Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

The starting point in a quantum mechanical problem is the construction of a Schrödinger equation. We try to solve it exactly to obtain wave function. A Schrödinger equation is exactly solvable only for a certain number of simple potentials. In most of the cases the Schrödinger equation cannot be solved exactly. The solution of the Schrödinger equation for the real systems is usually complicated and often exact solutions are very difficult to find or solutions not exist. Examples include as anharmonic oscillator, hydrogen atom in an electric field, a plane rotator in the presence of an applied electric field and so on. Therefore, we need to rely on approximation methods. The simple and most interesting and powerful approximate method is the perturbation theory developed by Schrödinger in 1926 [1]. Earlier Lord Rayleigh [2] analysed harmonic vibrations of a string perturbed by small inhomogeneities. The work of Rayleigh was pointed out by Schrödinger. Consequently, the method is also called Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory. This method is powerful for determining the changes in the discrete energy values and the associated eigenfunctions of a system due to a weak perturbation, provided the eigenpairs of the undisturbed system are available. The approximations obtained from the perturbation theory are used to calculate energy level diagrams and to understand the splitting and assignments of atomic and molecular spectra [35]. The perturbation theory has been proven to be useful in several fields of theoretical physics and also in chemistry. It provides considerable insight into various phenomena. The main disadvantage of this method is that in certain problems the perturbation series converges slowly or diverges.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 11, 2014•0 citations

Infinite-Order Perturbation Theory for Finite Systems

C. Alton Coulter

A perturbation theory is described which leads to two alternative methods for calculating the eigenvalues and normalized eigenstates of a perturbed Hamiltonian, the results being given to all orders in the perturbation. The expansions obtained are formulated in terms of two sets of partial sums which have simple, easily characterized forms, and they combine some of the advantages of both the Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation methods while avoiding some of the difficulties of each. In particular, one form of the perturbation expansions given here will in most cases of interest have a larger radius of convergence than the Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger series. As is usual for infinite-order treatments, the explicit form of the final result applies only to nondegenerate levels. However, some of the intermediate relations obtained in the derivation are of general validity. Since certain classes of unlinked diagrams appear in the expansions, the method described here is not suitable for application to systems containing a large number of particles.

Physical Review•May 25, 1967•0 citations

Resolvent Operator Formulation of Stationary State Perturbation Theory

Robert Yaris

By starting with an exact operator equation and using different methods of expanding the resolvent operator, the Schrödinger, Wigner—Brilloin, similarity transformation, gauge transformation, and first-order perturbation iteration method, perturbation expansions are generated in a rigorous and straightforward manner. It is also shown how additional perturbation and perturbation iteration methods can be generated.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 1, 1964•9 citations
Abstract The Rayleigh-Schrodinger theory described in the preceding chapter is by no means the only approach to stationary perturbation theory, nor is it usually the most powerful. As one of many possible alternatives we shall now describe an iterative procedure for approximating stationary states, sometimes called Wigner-Brillouin perturbation theory, which resembles the Feynman-Dyson method of Section 11.3.
A formulation of Schr\"odinger perturbation theory is developed that gives a unified treatment of non-degenerate and degenerate cases, is unique, and has a nonzero radius of convergence under very general conditions. Two alternative procedures are given for finding perturbed eigenvectors, one of which is simpler for the nondegenerate case or for small finite degeneracy, the other simpler for infinite or large finite degeneracy. The low-order terms in the perturbation expansions of quantities used in applications are given. The perturbation theory formulated in this paper has the following advantages over the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories: (i) When the convergence criterion is satisfied, bounds on the error made in replacing an appropriate infinite perturbation series by its first nnn terms can be obtained. (ii) For the case of degeneracy, the conventional Schr\"odinger perturbation theory can break down under conditions to which the convergence of the perturbation theory developed in this paper are insensitive. (iii) There is no implicit dependence on the eigenvalue, such as appears in the Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory. (iv) For the case of degeneracy, statistical information about the distribution of certain eigenvalues can be obtained without finding the individual eigenvalues. (v) The theory is applicable to a wider class of problems than the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories.
Modern computers have made possible the evaluation of higher order terms of perturbation series. Apart from the empirical work involving numerical calculations, much formal mathematical work has been done on the convergence properties of perturbation series and of Pade approximants which represent them. Some of the modern work in perturbation theory is reviewed in the context of traditional results from the theory of real and complex variables. The two major versions of time-independent perturbation theory, the Rayleigh-Schrodinger (RS) and Brillouin-Wigner (BW) theories, are compared and contrasted, and the alternative techniques for evaluating the terms in the energy series are discussed. The sum-over-states method, the differential equation method and the variational principle method are treated, with emphasis on their inter-relations.
The starting point in a quantum mechanical problem is the construction of a Schrödinger equation. We try to solve it exactly to obtain wave function. A Schrödinger equation is exactly solvable only for a certain number of simple potentials. In most of the cases the Schrödinger equation cannot be solved exactly. The solution of the Schrödinger equation for the real systems is usually complicated and often exact solutions are very difficult to find or solutions not exist. Examples include as anharmonic oscillator, hydrogen atom in an electric field, a plane rotator in the presence of an applied electric field and so on. Therefore, we need to rely on approximation methods. The simple and most interesting and powerful approximate method is the perturbation theory developed by Schrödinger in 1926 [1]. Earlier Lord Rayleigh [2] analysed harmonic vibrations of a string perturbed by small inhomogeneities. The work of Rayleigh was pointed out by Schrödinger. Consequently, the method is also called Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory. This method is powerful for determining the changes in the discrete energy values and the associated eigenfunctions of a system due to a weak perturbation, provided the eigenpairs of the undisturbed system are available. The approximations obtained from the perturbation theory are used to calculate energy level diagrams and to understand the splitting and assignments of atomic and molecular spectra [35]. The perturbation theory has been proven to be useful in several fields of theoretical physics and also in chemistry. It provides considerable insight into various phenomena. The main disadvantage of this method is that in certain problems the perturbation series converges slowly or diverges.
A perturbation theory is described which leads to two alternative methods for calculating the eigenvalues and normalized eigenstates of a perturbed Hamiltonian, the results being given to all orders in the perturbation. The expansions obtained are formulated in terms of two sets of partial sums which have simple, easily characterized forms, and they combine some of the advantages of both the Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation methods while avoiding some of the difficulties of each. In particular, one form of the perturbation expansions given here will in most cases of interest have a larger radius of convergence than the Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger series. As is usual for infinite-order treatments, the explicit form of the final result applies only to nondegenerate levels. However, some of the intermediate relations obtained in the derivation are of general validity. Since certain classes of unlinked diagrams appear in the expansions, the method described here is not suitable for application to systems containing a large number of particles.