Abstract The reconciliation of wave-like optical interference phenomena with the particle-like properties of the quantized radiation field has intrigued physicists since the early years of the present century. Two main topics of discussion have been the effect of very low light levels-of the order of one photon at a time in the interferometer-on the interference fringes, and the possibility of determining which of the two optical paths through the interferometer were taken by the photons that produce the fringes. The first experiment with very low light levels was performed by Taylor (1909) at the instigation of J. J. Thomson. He found that Young’s interference fringes persisted when the low light levels were compensated by long photographic exposure times.
Abstract The reconciliation of wave-like optical interference phenomena with the particle-like properties of the quantized radiation field has intrigued physicists since the early years of the present century. Two main topics of discussion have been the effect of very low light levels-of the order of one photon at a time in the interferometer-on the interference fringes, and the possibility of determining which of the two optical paths through the interferometer were taken by the photons that produce the fringes. The first experiment with very low light levels was performed by Taylor (1909) at the instigation of J. J. Thomson. He found that Young’s interference fringes persisted when the low light levels were compensated by long photographic exposure times.
Interference fringes produced by the superposition of light beams from two independent lasers have been investigated under conditions where the light flux was so low that one photon was usually received at the detector before the next one was emitted by one or the other source. Because the average number of photons detected in each observation was only about 10, a photon correlation technique was used to demonstrate the presence of interference fringes. The measurement procedure was automated, and this led to much greater statistical accuracy than was previously reported. The effect of varying the observation time and the number of interference fringes sampled was investigated, and found to be in good agreement with theory.
3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.
Experiments with single photons Central to the entire discipline of quantum optics, as should be evident from the preceding chapters, is the concept of the photon. Yet it is perhaps worthwhile to pause and ask: what is the evidence for the existence of photons? Most of us first encounter the photon concept in the context of the photo-electric effect. As we showed in Chapter 5, the photo-electric effect is, in fact, used to indirectly detect the presence of photons – the photo-electrons being the entities counted. But it turns out that some aspects of the photo-electric effect can be explained without introducing the concept of the photon. In fact, one can go quite far with a semiclassical theory in which only the atoms are quantized with the field treated classically. But we hasten to say that, for a satisfactory explanation of all aspects of the photo-electric effect, the field must be quantized. As it happens, the other venerable “proof” of the existence of photons, the Compton effect, can also be explained without quantized fields. In an attempt to obtain quantum effects with light, Taylor, in 1909, obtained interference fringes in an experiment with an extremely weak source of light. His source was a gas flame and the emitted light was attenuated by means of screens made of smoked glass.
A single photon exhibits wave-particle duality in the Young's double-slit interferometer. The duality character-ized by an interference visibilityVas the wave-like property and a which-path informationDas the particle-like property has tradeoff relationD2+V2≤1known as complementarity [1]–[3]. There are a lot of studies about the complementary nature of photons from various viewpoints such as delayed-choice experiments, theoretical works related to the uncertainty principle, and so on. More recently, studies have expanded the concept of the wave-particle duality to higher-order interferometric scenarios, in which the input light includes two or more pho-tons [4], [5]. Despite having a long history, all previous studies have been related to phase correlation of optical states, which reason would be why the main focus in the first place is the investigation of the mysterious quantum nature of a photon, including the superposition principle.
We have observed interference fringes, like those in Young’s classic experiment, in the laser light scattered by two trapped atoms. The interference fringes are present only in one polarization of the scattered light. The polarization dependence is related to the complementarity principle, which forbids the simultaneous observation of wave-like and particle-like aspects of light. The interference fringes are due to processes in which a single photon scatters from two atoms. We describe methods which might be used to observe other interference eects due to two photons scattering from two atoms.