Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

QuantumShare: Towards an Ontology for Bridging the Quantum Divide

Julian Martens, Indika Kumara, Geert Monsieur, Willem‐Jan van den Heuvel, Damian A. Tamburri

Published Jan 1, 2023• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-47262-6_22

Related papers

Bridging the Quantum-Classical Divide

Springer eBooks•Nov 13, 2007•0 citations

Quantum Ontologies

Henry Pierce Stapp

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Quantum Computing and the Ontological Bridge: Implications for AGI in the Metamonism Framework

Andrii Myshko

Quantum computing promises to revolutionize computation by leveraging superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. This paper examines whether it can bridge the ontological divide between processual reality (Monos) and representational structures (Logos) in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Drawing on Metamonism CORE = v1.3, we argue that quantum systems, as currently conceived, accelerate stabilization rather than prevent it, remaining trapped in Logos-dominant paradigms.We distinguish the illusion of an ontological bridge—where quantum processuality serves classical fixation—from a genuine integration that could enable enforced Unfold. While quantum dynamics approximates Monos, measurement enforces Logos, making quantum computing a more efficient optimizer rather than a pathway to non equilibrium cognition.This analysis reframes quantum computing not as an AGI enabler but as a test case for ontological viability in intelligence research and establishes it as a prime example of accelerated fixation, disqualifying it from consideration as a foundation for non-equilibrium cognition.

•Jan 29, 2026•0 citations

A Very Simple Quantum Model of Mind and Matter

Giuliana Galli Carminati, François Martin, Federico Carminati

Since the Pauli-Jung conjecture of an ontological unity of Mind and Matter was formulated almost one century ago, there has been a lot of interest in trying to define a model based on the principles of Quantum Mechanics. In particular, Quantum Mechanics seems to offer a possi- bility to bridge the epistemological gap between Mind and Matter to build a model of what the 17th century philosopher Gerhard Dorn has called the ”Unus Mundus”, i.e. the ontological healing of the perceived duality of the Universe. Following other authors who have treated this matter before us, in the current paper we define a very simple model of Mind and Matter represented by two qubits and we discuss their in- teraction and their entanglement. In particular we show how a generic Hamiltonian can be divided in four components. Two of them repre- sent local evolutions of the qubits, each one acting on one of the two qubits and not on the other one. The other two define two different modes of interaction that we describe as the general evolution of the Unus Mundus and the interaction generating synchronicity. We con- clude with a discussion on the different times governing the evolution of the Mind-Matter ensemble.

NeuroQuantology•Apr 19, 2017•10 citations

Quantum Ontology: Out of This World?

Travis Norsen

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

Bridging the quantum divide

Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering•Dec 10, 2025•0 citations
Quantum computing promises to revolutionize computation by leveraging superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. This paper examines whether it can bridge the ontological divide between processual reality (Monos) and representational structures (Logos) in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Drawing on Metamonism CORE = v1.3, we argue that quantum systems, as currently conceived, accelerate stabilization rather than prevent it, remaining trapped in Logos-dominant paradigms.We distinguish the illusion of an ontological bridge—where quantum processuality serves classical fixation—from a genuine integration that could enable enforced Unfold. While quantum dynamics approximates Monos, measurement enforces Logos, making quantum computing a more efficient optimizer rather than a pathway to non equilibrium cognition.This analysis reframes quantum computing not as an AGI enabler but as a test case for ontological viability in intelligence research and establishes it as a prime example of accelerated fixation, disqualifying it from consideration as a foundation for non-equilibrium cognition.
Since the Pauli-Jung conjecture of an ontological unity of Mind and Matter was formulated almost one century ago, there has been a lot of interest in trying to define a model based on the principles of Quantum Mechanics. In particular, Quantum Mechanics seems to offer a possi- bility to bridge the epistemological gap between Mind and Matter to build a model of what the 17th century philosopher Gerhard Dorn has called the ”Unus Mundus”, i.e. the ontological healing of the perceived duality of the Universe. Following other authors who have treated this matter before us, in the current paper we define a very simple model of Mind and Matter represented by two qubits and we discuss their in- teraction and their entanglement. In particular we show how a generic Hamiltonian can be divided in four components. Two of them repre- sent local evolutions of the qubits, each one acting on one of the two qubits and not on the other one. The other two define two different modes of interaction that we describe as the general evolution of the Unus Mundus and the interaction generating synchronicity. We con- clude with a discussion on the different times governing the evolution of the Mind-Matter ensemble.