Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Schrödinger’s Cat May Be Dead All Along

Dhan Lord B. Fortela, Ashley P. Mikolajczyk

Published Oct 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

By framing the problem of determining the state of Schrodinger’s cat as a problem of searching for Hidden Markov Model (HMM), this work shows that there is a high chance that Schrodinger’s cat is dead with a stationary probabilities P(Cat = Dead) = 1, and P(Cat = Alive) = 0.
DOI
10.20944/preprints202310.0009.v1

Related papers

Schrödinger’s Cat May Be Dead All Along

Dhan Lord B. Fortela, Ashley P. Mikolajczyk

By framing the problem of determining the state of Schrodinger’s cat as a problem of searching for Hidden Markov Model (HMM), this work shows that Schrodinger’s cat is dead with stationary probabilities P(Cat = Dead) = 1 and P(Cat = Alive) = 0 consistently in various observation-based modelling of the HMM.

•Oct 9, 2023•1 citation

Least paradoxical states of the Schrödinger cat

Andrey Pereverzev

Modeling the Schrödinger cat by a two state system and assuming that the cat is coupled to the environment we look for the least paradoxical states of the Schrödinger cat in the following way. We require the reduced density matrix of the cat for one of the two states in the superposition to be the same as the one for the total state while distinct from the reduced density matrix of the cat for the other state in the superposition. We then look for the reduced density matrices for which the cat is as alive as possible for the first state (and as dead as possible for the second state). The resulting states are those in which the probability for the cat to be alive (or dead) is $1/2+\sqrt 2/4\approx 0.854$

arXiv:quant-ph/0310025•Oct 3, 2003•0 citations

Schrödinger’s cat’s problem

Martin Cohen

The physicist Erwin Schrödinger described, back in 1935, one aspect of this strange phenomenon. He placed his cat in a sealed box with a piece of radioactive material which might or might not send out a sub-atomic particle. If it did, the Geiger counter was designed to trigger a release of poisonous gas in the box, and thereby kill his cat. The Geiger counter was set up to be triggered just enough to give a 50-50 chance of a particle being detected, and therefore the cat an even chance of being poisoned or not. (In those days, this sort of experiment was acceptable, particularly as it was only a thought experiment.) Radioactive behaviour is unpredictable (except in a general, statistical probability way). There is no way of working out whether or not the Geiger counter will be triggered off. If the sub-atomic event does not occur-the cat lives. Otherwise, it dies. Just as the photon (in Problem 93) will quite happily go through both slits until someone tries to measure or detect it, at which point what the physicists call ‘the collapse of the wave function’ takes place, the particle can both trigger the poison gas and not trigger the poison gas. Until someone looks, Schrödinger’s idea is that his cat, for a while, is both alive and dead!

Routledge eBooks•Nov 1, 2002•0 citations

Schrödinger Cats and Quantum Complementarity

Lorenzo Maccone

Abstract Complementarity tells us we cannot know precisely the values of all the properties of a quantum object at the same time: the precise determination of one property implies that the value of some other (complementary) property is undefined. E.g. the precise knowledge of the position of a particle implies that its momentum is undefined. Here we show that a Schrödinger cat has a well defined value of a property that is complementary to its “being dead or alive” property. Then, thanks to complementarity, it has an undefined value of the property “being dead or alive”. In other words, the cat paradox is explained through quantum complementarity: of its many complementary properties, any quantum system, such as a cat, can have a well defined value only of one at a time. Schrödinger’s cat has a definite value of a property which is complementary to “being dead or alive”, so it is neither dead nor alive. Figuratively one can say it is both dead and alive. While this interpretation only uses textbook concepts (the Copenhagen interpretation), apparently it has never explicitly appeared in the literature. We detail how to build an Arduino based simulation of Schrödinger’s experiment based on these concepts for science outreach events.

Foundations of Physics•Jan 25, 2024•11 citations

Quantum Entanglement

Yanhua H. Shih

In quantum theory, a particle is allowed to be in a state of coherent superposition among a set of orthogonal states. A vivid picture of this concept is the “Schrödinger cat”: a cat is alive and dead simultaneously. This would be no surprise if one means a large number of an ensemble of cats with 50% alive and 50% dead. But, “Schrödinger cat” is a cat. People are talking about a cat being alive and dead simultaneously. In mathematics, the best word to characterize the relationship between states “alive” and “dead” is perhaps “orthogonal”. In quantum mechanics, the superposition of orthogonal states is used to describe the state of a quantum object, or a particle. The superposition principle is indeed a mystery compared to our everyday classical life experience. Beyond the superposition of orthogonal single-particle states, the superposition of orthogonal multi-particle states represents an even more troubling concept in classical theory.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2020•0 citations

Determining When Schrödinger's Cats Die

Ken Krechmer

E. Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment to illustrate the discontinuity, not fully understood, that appears in quantum mechanics when a measurement process occurs. The cats in his thought experiment appear to be both alive and dead. This unreasonable appearance has not been satisfactorily explained before. Calibration, which is required in metrology, is not treated in physics theory. This paper illustrates how calibration to a non-local time standard explains the alive and dead appearance of Schrödinger's cats.

•Jun 16, 2023•0 citations
Modeling the Schrödinger cat by a two state system and assuming that the cat is coupled to the environment we look for the least paradoxical states of the Schrödinger cat in the following way. We require the reduced density matrix of the cat for one of the two states in the superposition to be the same as the one for the total state while distinct from the reduced density matrix of the cat for the other state in the superposition. We then look for the reduced density matrices for which the cat is as alive as possible for the first state (and as dead as possible for the second state). The resulting states are those in which the probability for the cat to be alive (or dead) is 1/2+2/4≈0.8541/2+\sqrt 2/4\approx 0.8541/2+2​/4≈0.854
The physicist Erwin Schrödinger described, back in 1935, one aspect of this strange phenomenon. He placed his cat in a sealed box with a piece of radioactive material which might or might not send out a sub-atomic particle. If it did, the Geiger counter was designed to trigger a release of poisonous gas in the box, and thereby kill his cat. The Geiger counter was set up to be triggered just enough to give a 50-50 chance of a particle being detected, and therefore the cat an even chance of being poisoned or not. (In those days, this sort of experiment was acceptable, particularly as it was only a thought experiment.) Radioactive behaviour is unpredictable (except in a general, statistical probability way). There is no way of working out whether or not the Geiger counter will be triggered off. If the sub-atomic event does not occur-the cat lives. Otherwise, it dies. Just as the photon (in Problem 93) will quite happily go through both slits until someone tries to measure or detect it, at which point what the physicists call ‘the collapse of the wave function’ takes place, the particle can both trigger the poison gas and not trigger the poison gas. Until someone looks, Schrödinger’s idea is that his cat, for a while, is both alive and dead!
Abstract Complementarity tells us we cannot know precisely the values of all the properties of a quantum object at the same time: the precise determination of one property implies that the value of some other (complementary) property is undefined. E.g. the precise knowledge of the position of a particle implies that its momentum is undefined. Here we show that a Schrödinger cat has a well defined value of a property that is complementary to its “being dead or alive” property. Then, thanks to complementarity, it has an undefined value of the property “being dead or alive”. In other words, the cat paradox is explained through quantum complementarity: of its many complementary properties, any quantum system, such as a cat, can have a well defined value only of one at a time. Schrödinger’s cat has a definite value of a property which is complementary to “being dead or alive”, so it is neither dead nor alive. Figuratively one can say it is both dead and alive. While this interpretation only uses textbook concepts (the Copenhagen interpretation), apparently it has never explicitly appeared in the literature. We detail how to build an Arduino based simulation of Schrödinger’s experiment based on these concepts for science outreach events.
In quantum theory, a particle is allowed to be in a state of coherent superposition among a set of orthogonal states. A vivid picture of this concept is the “Schrödinger cat”: a cat is alive and dead simultaneously. This would be no surprise if one means a large number of an ensemble of cats with 50% alive and 50% dead. But, “Schrödinger cat” is a cat. People are talking about a cat being alive and dead simultaneously. In mathematics, the best word to characterize the relationship between states “alive” and “dead” is perhaps “orthogonal”. In quantum mechanics, the superposition of orthogonal states is used to describe the state of a quantum object, or a particle. The superposition principle is indeed a mystery compared to our everyday classical life experience. Beyond the superposition of orthogonal single-particle states, the superposition of orthogonal multi-particle states represents an even more troubling concept in classical theory.
E. Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment to illustrate the discontinuity, not fully understood, that appears in quantum mechanics when a measurement process occurs. The cats in his thought experiment appear to be both alive and dead. This unreasonable appearance has not been satisfactorily explained before. Calibration, which is required in metrology, is not treated in physics theory. This paper illustrates how calibration to a non-local time standard explains the alive and dead appearance of Schrödinger's cats.