In order to verify the functional correctness of quantum circuits or algorithms, a prominent approach is to specify them as quantum programs and semi-automatically deduce them in a theorem prover. It is indispensable to first formalize the semantics of the basic quantum language. We formalize in Coq an imperative language which allows for classical and quantum information interactions. We define small-step operational semantics and state-based denotational semantics. Then we prove a consistency theorem between these two semantics. A distribution-based denotational semantics is also defined and related to the state-based one. Finally, we describe a few typical quantum algorithms and utilize the distribution-based denotational semantics to verify their correctness.
In order to verify the functional correctness of quantum circuits or algorithms, a prominent approach is to specify them as quantum programs and semi-automatically deduce them in a theorem prover. It is indispensable to first formalize the semantics of the basic quantum language. We formalize in Coq an imperative language which allows for classical and quantum information interactions. We define small-step operational semantics and state-based denotational semantics. Then we prove a consistency theorem between these two semantics. A distribution-based denotational semantics is also defined and related to the state-based one. Finally, we describe a few typical quantum algorithms and utilize the distribution-based denotational semantics to verify their correctness.
We describe an embedding of the QWIRE quantum circuit language in the Coq proof assistant. This allows programmers to write quantum circuits using high-level abstractions and to prove properties of those circuits using Coq's theorem proving features. The implementation uses higher-order abstract syntax to represent variable binding and provides a type-checking algorithm for linear wire types, ensuring that quantum circuits are well-formed. We formalize a denotational semantics that interprets QWIRE circuits as superoperators on density matrices, and prove the correctness of some simple quantum programs.
CoqQ is a framework for reasoning about quantum programs in the Coq proof assistant. Its main components are: a deeply embedded quantum programming language, in which classic quantum algorithms are easily expressed, and an expressive program logic for proving properties of programs. CoqQ is foundational: the program logic is formally proved sound with respect to a denotational semantics based on state-of-art mathematical libraries (MathComp and MathComp Analysis). CoqQ is also practical: assertions can use Dirac expressions, which eases concise specifications, and proofs can exploit local and parallel reasoning, which minimizes verification effort. We illustrate the applicability of CoqQ with many examples from the literature.
In this thesis, we study quantum programming languages, and focus on the quantum lambda-calculus, a paradigmatic language defined by Selinger and Valiron, which mixes a rich classical control flow (higher order functions, etc.) and quantum data (qubit creation, measure, and unitary operations). In this thesis, we search for a denotational semantics of this language, in other words, we extract the meaning and behaviour of programs by interpreting them in an adequately chosen mathematical universe. In order to model the quantum lambda-calculus, one must adapt the traditional denotational models to the mathematics of quantum computation (Hilbert spaces, density matrices, etc.). We have three main contributions:Firstly, we extend game semantics to the quantum case. Game semantics is a dynamic approach to denotational semantics, which focuses on the sequence of interactions between a program and its environment. We obtain the first denotational model of the full quantum lambda-calculus which is both compositional and interactive, meaning that it represents the dynamic of the execution. Our model generalise the recently developed model for the probabilistic case.Secondly, we formally link our model to the only pre-existing denotational model of the full lambda-calculus, the quantum relational model of Pagani, Selinger and Valiron.Lastly, we prove that our game model is fully abstract, the gold standard of denotational semantics, which ensures a total correspondence between the programming language and the model. We deduce that the quantum relational model was also fully abstract, which was an open problem.This thesis is constituted of three parts. The first part details some preliminaries on category theory, used for defining a formal framework including both the quantum game model and the quantum relational model, some preliminaries on the mathematics of quantum computation, and then some preliminaries on quantum programming and its models. The second part starts with some preliminaries on game semantics and defines our quantum game model in the simplified case of the linear quantum lambda-calculus. The third part builds on the second part to define the full quantum game model, prove its full abstraction, and deduce that the quantum relational model is fully abstract too.
In this article, we investigate the fundamental laws of quantum programming. We extend a comprehensive set of Hoare et al.’s basic laws of classical programming to the quantum setting. These laws characterise the algebraic properties of quantum programs, such as the distributivity of sequential composition over (quantum) if -statements and the unfolding of nested (quantum) if -statements. At the same time, we clarify some subtle differences between certain laws of classical programming and their quantum counterparts. Additionally, we derive a fixpoint characterisation of quantum while -loops and a loop-based realisation of tail recursion in quantum programming. Furthermore, we establish two normal form theorems: one for quantum circuits and one for finite quantum programs. The theory in which these laws are established is formalised in the Coq proof assistant, and all of these laws are mechanically verified. As an application case of our laws, we present a formal derivation of the principle of deferred measurements in dynamic quantum circuits. We expect that these laws can be utilised in correctness-preserving transformation, compilation and automatic code optimisation in quantum programming. In particular, because these laws are formally verified in Coq, they can be confidently applied in quantum programme development.
The field of quantum mechanics predates computer science by at least ten years, the time between the publication of the Schrodinger equation and the Church-Turing thesis. It took another fifty years for Feynman to recognize that harnessing quantum mechanics is necessary to efficiently simulate physics and for David Deutsch to propose the quantum Turing machine. After thirty more years, we are finally getting close to the first general-purpose quantum computers based upon prototypes by IBM, Intel, Google and others.\nWhile physicists and engineers have worked on building scalable quantum computers, theoretical computer scientists have made their own advances. Complexity theorists introduced quantum complexity classes like BQP and QMA; Shor and Grover developed their famous algorithms for factoring and unstructured search. Programming languages researchers pursued two main research directions: Small-scale languages like QPL and the quantum lambda-calculi for reasoning about quantum computation and large-scale languages like Quipper and Q# for industrial-scale quantum software development. This thesis aims to unify these two threads while adding a third one: formal verification.\nWe argue that quantum programs demand machine-checkable proofs of correctness. We justify this on the basis of the complexity of programs manipulating quantum states, the expense of running quantum programs, and the inapplicability of traditional debugging techniques to programs whose states cannot be examined. We further argue that the existing mathematical models of quantum computation make this an easier task than one could reasonably expect. In light of these observations we introduce QWIRE, a tool for writing verifiable, large scale quantum programs.\nQWIRE is not merely a language for writing and verifying quantum circuits: it is a verified circuit description language. This means that the semantics of QWIRE circuits are verified in the Coq proof assistant. We also implement verified abstractions, like ancilla management and reversible circuit compilation. Finally, we turn QWIRE and Coq's abilities outwards, towards verifying popular quantum algorithms like quantum teleportation. We argue that this tool provides a solid foundation for research into quantum programming languages and formal verification going forward.
We formalize the theory of quantum Hoare logic (QHL) [TOPLAS 33(6),19], an extension of Hoare logic for reasoning about quantum programs. In particular, we formalize the syntax and semantics of quantum programs in Isabelle/HOL, write down the rules of quantum Hoare logic, and verify the soundness and completeness of the deduction system for partial correctness of quantum programs. As preliminary work, we formalize some necessary mathematical background in linear algebra, and define tensor products of vectors and matrices on quantum variables. As an application, we verify the correctness of Grover’s search algorithm. To our best knowledge, this is the first time a Hoare logic for quantum programs is formalized in an interactive theorem prover, and used to verify the correctness of a nontrivial quantum algorithm.