Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthesis lectures on engineering, science, and technology

Weak Simulation

Stefan Hillmich, Robert Wille

Published Sep 27, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-40825-0_5

Related papers

Strong Simulation

Stefan Hillmich, Robert Wille

Synthesis lectures on engineering, science, and technology•Sep 27, 2023•0 citations

Weak, strong, and uniform quantum simulations

Dongsheng Wang

In this work, we introduce different types of quantum simulations according to different operator topologies on a Hilbert space, namely, uniform, strong, and weak quantum simulations. We show that they have the same computational power that the efficiently solvable problems are in bounded-error quantum polynomial time. For the weak simulation, we formalize a general weak quantum simulation problem and construct an algorithm which is valid for all instances. Also, we analyze the computational power of quantum simulations by proving the query lower bound for simulating a general quantum process.

Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2015•5 citations

Approximate Simulation

Stefan Hillmich, Robert Wille

Synthesis lectures on engineering, science, and technology•Sep 27, 2023•0 citations

Modelling Weak-Coherent QKD Systems Using a Classical Simulation Framework

Sören Kreinberg, Piotr Novik, Igor Koltchanov +1 more

We demonstrate how an existing simulation framework for modelling classical optical systems can be utilized for simulations of weak-coherent QKD links.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Improved Weak Simulation of Universal Quantum Circuits by Correlated $L_1$ Sampling

Lucas Kocia

Bounding the cost of classically simulating the outcomes of universal quantum circuits to additive error $δ$ is often called weak simulation and is a direct way to determine when they confer a quantum advantage. Weak simulation of the $T$+Clifford gateset is $BQP$-complete and is expected to scale exponentially with the number $t$ of $T$ gates. We constructively tighten the upper bound on the worst-case $L_1$ norm sampling cost to next order in $t$ from $\mathcal O(ξ^t δ^{-2})$ if $δ^2 \gg ξ^{-t}$ to $\mathcal O((ξ^t{-}t) δ^{-2} )$ if $δ^2 \gg (ξ^t -t)^{-1}$, where $ξ^t = 2^{\sim 0.228 t}$ is the stabilizer extent of the $t$-tensored $T$ gate magic state. We accomplish this by replacing independent $L_1$ sampling in the popular SPARSIFY algorithm used in many weak simulators with correlated $L_1$ sampling. As an aside, this result demonstrates that the $T$ gate magic state's approximate stabilizer state decomposition is not multiplicative with respect to $t$, for finite values, despite the multiplicativity of its stabilizer extent. This is the first weak simulation algorithm that has lowered this bound's dependence on finite $t$ in the worst-case to our knowledge and establishes how to obtain further such reductions in $t$.

arXiv:2104.07250•Apr 15, 2021•0 citations

Computer Simulation

Scott Kirkpatrick

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations
In this work, we introduce different types of quantum simulations according to different operator topologies on a Hilbert space, namely, uniform, strong, and weak quantum simulations. We show that they have the same computational power that the efficiently solvable problems are in bounded-error quantum polynomial time. For the weak simulation, we formalize a general weak quantum simulation problem and construct an algorithm which is valid for all instances. Also, we analyze the computational power of quantum simulations by proving the query lower bound for simulating a general quantum process.
Improved Weak Simulation of Universal Quantum Circuits by Correlated L1L_1L1​ Sampling
Bounding the cost of classically simulating the outcomes of universal quantum circuits to additive error δδδ is often called weak simulation and is a direct way to determine when they confer a quantum advantage. Weak simulation of the TTT+Clifford gateset is BQPBQPBQP-complete and is expected to scale exponentially with the number ttt of TTT gates. We constructively tighten the upper bound on the worst-case L1L_1L1​ norm sampling cost to next order in ttt from O(ξtδ−2)\mathcal O(ξ^t δ^{-2})O(ξtδ−2) if δ2≫ξ−tδ^2 \gg ξ^{-t}δ2≫ξ−t to O((ξt−t)δ−2)\mathcal O((ξ^t{-}t) δ^{-2} )O((ξt−t)δ−2) if δ2≫(ξt−t)−1δ^2 \gg (ξ^t -t)^{-1}δ2≫(ξt−t)−1, where ξt=2∼0.228tξ^t = 2^{\sim 0.228 t}ξt=2∼0.228t is the stabilizer extent of the ttt-tensored TTT gate magic state. We accomplish this by replacing independent L1L_1L1​ sampling in the popular SPARSIFY algorithm used in many weak simulators with correlated L1L_1L1​ sampling. As an aside, this result demonstrates that the TTT gate magic state's approximate stabilizer state decomposition is not multiplicative with respect to ttt, for finite values, despite the multiplicativity of its stabilizer extent. This is the first weak simulation algorithm that has lowered this bound's dependence on finite ttt in the worst-case to our knowledge and establishes how to obtain further such reductions in ttt.