Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics

Position Operators of Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Pankaj Sharan

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-35962-0_1

Related papers

Position Operators of Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Pankaj Sharan

SpringerBriefs in physics•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Position and Momentum in Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 8, 2015•0 citations

On non-self-adjoint operators for observables in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Electrodynamics

Erasmo Recami, V. S. Olkhovsky, Sergei P. Maydanyuk

Aim of this paper is to show the possible significance, and usefulness, of various non-self-adjoint operators for suitable Observables in non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, and in quantum electrodynamics. More specifically, this work starts dealing with: (i) the maximal hermitian (but not selfadjoint) Time operator in non-relativistic quantum mechanics and in quantum electrodynamics; and with: (ii) the problem of the four-position and four-momentum operators, each one with its hermitian and anti-hermitian parts, for relativistic spin-zero particles. Afterwards, other physically important applications of non-selfadjoint (and even non-hermitian) operators are discussed: in particular, (iii) we reanalyze in detail the interesting possibility of associating quasi-hermitian Hamiltonians with (decaying) unstable states in nuclear physics. Finally, we briefly mention the cases of quantum dissipation, as well as of the nuclear optical potential.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Localization of particles in quantum field theory

W. Westra

We put forward an interpretation of scalar quantum field theory as relativistic quantum mechanics by curing well known problems related to locality. A probabilistic interpretation of quantum field theory similar to quantum mechanics is difficult if particle localization is defined using the Newton-Wigner position operator as it is non-local and non-covariant. An alternative bilinear covariant position operator is discussed which incorporates a time operator that can be exponentiated to a unitary operator. Moreover, it satisfies an algebra that unifies special relativity and quantum mechanics and has the same form for particles with spin. Higher power position operators are derived which yield Heisenberg's uncertainty relations. Our ideas are illustrated with a relativistic wave function whose probability density can be perfectly localized.

arXiv:1012.3472•Dec 15, 2010•3 citations

The Relational Blockworld Interpretation of Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

W. M. Stuckey, Michael Silberstein, Michael Cifone

We introduce a new interpretation of non‐relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) called Relational Blockworld (RBW). We motivate the interpretation by outlining two results due to Kaiser, Bohr, Ulfeck, Mottelson, and Anandan, independently. First, the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum can be obtained from boost and translation operators, respectively, in a spacetime where the relativity of simultaneity holds. Second, the QM density operator can be obtained from the spacetime symmetry group of the experimental configuration exclusively. We show how QM, obtained from relativistic quantum field theory per RBW, explains the twin‐slit experiment and conclude by resolving the standard conceptual problems of QM, i.e., the measurement problem, entanglement and non‐locality.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•1 citation

Quantum mechanics without the position operator

Hans Laue

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1981•0 citations
Aim of this paper is to show the possible significance, and usefulness, of various non-self-adjoint operators for suitable Observables in non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, and in quantum electrodynamics. More specifically, this work starts dealing with: (i) the maximal hermitian (but not selfadjoint) Time operator in non-relativistic quantum mechanics and in quantum electrodynamics; and with: (ii) the problem of the four-position and four-momentum operators, each one with its hermitian and anti-hermitian parts, for relativistic spin-zero particles. Afterwards, other physically important applications of non-selfadjoint (and even non-hermitian) operators are discussed: in particular, (iii) we reanalyze in detail the interesting possibility of associating quasi-hermitian Hamiltonians with (decaying) unstable states in nuclear physics. Finally, we briefly mention the cases of quantum dissipation, as well as of the nuclear optical potential.
We put forward an interpretation of scalar quantum field theory as relativistic quantum mechanics by curing well known problems related to locality. A probabilistic interpretation of quantum field theory similar to quantum mechanics is difficult if particle localization is defined using the Newton-Wigner position operator as it is non-local and non-covariant. An alternative bilinear covariant position operator is discussed which incorporates a time operator that can be exponentiated to a unitary operator. Moreover, it satisfies an algebra that unifies special relativity and quantum mechanics and has the same form for particles with spin. Higher power position operators are derived which yield Heisenberg's uncertainty relations. Our ideas are illustrated with a relativistic wave function whose probability density can be perfectly localized.
We introduce a new interpretation of non‐relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) called Relational Blockworld (RBW). We motivate the interpretation by outlining two results due to Kaiser, Bohr, Ulfeck, Mottelson, and Anandan, independently. First, the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum can be obtained from boost and translation operators, respectively, in a spacetime where the relativity of simultaneity holds. Second, the QM density operator can be obtained from the spacetime symmetry group of the experimental configuration exclusively. We show how QM, obtained from relativistic quantum field theory per RBW, explains the twin‐slit experiment and conclude by resolving the standard conceptual problems of QM, i.e., the measurement problem, entanglement and non‐locality.