Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Access

Efficient Pause Location Prediction Using Quantum Annealing Simulations and Machine Learning

Michael Ryan Zielewski, Keichi Takahashi, Yoichi Shimomura, Hiroyuki Takizawa

Published Jan 1, 2023• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Despite increases in qubit count and connectivity in quantum annealers, a quantum speedup has yet to be observed for problems of practical significance. In order to further improve annealer performance, some researchers focus on tuning annealer parameters, such as the annealing schedule. In this work, we focus on pausing, an annealing schedule modification that has been shown to improve the probability of solving an optimization problem by orders of magnitude. However, a challenge associated with pausing is selecting an appropriate pause location, as pausing is only effective in problem-dependent regions and ineffective elsewhere. Moreover, there is little advice on how to determine where pausing is effective. Thus, pausing effectively is difficult and often inaccessible to the majority of users. To address these issues, we propose a data-driven method that leverages machine learning to predict optimal pause locations. First, we construct a dataset consisting of optimization problems and their corresponding optimal pause locations. The optimal pause locations are determined using spin-vector Monte Carlo, a method known to yield results similar to quantum annealing. Next, we train a convolutional neural network on this dataset, demonstrating its ability to distinguish between problem types and accurately predict the optimal pause location. Finally, we evaluate the model on multiple types of optimization problems. Our results show that the pause locations predicted by our method improve solution quality for all selected problem types. Additionally, our model can be pre-trained and easily distributed, making the power of pausing accessible to users unfamiliar with annealing schedule modifications.

DOI
10.1109/access.2023.3317698

Related papers

A Method for Reducing Time-to-Solution in Quantum Annealing Through Pausing

Michael Ryan Zielewski, Hiroyuki Takizawa

Recent research has shown that alternative annealing schedules provide the means for improving performance in modern quantum annealing devices. One such type of schedule is forward annealing with a pause, in which there is a period of time when system evolution is paused. While the results from using this type of schedule have been promising, effectively using a pause is not a trivial task. One challenge associated with introducing a pause into the schedule is determining the point in the anneal at which the pause will start. Additionally, tuning the schedule in real-time requires a significant amount of time. A second challenge is that while a pause may increase the number of correct solutions returned from the annealer, the time-to-solution, a standard metric for measuring performance in quantum annealing, will not necessarily be improved. We propose a method for constructing annealing schedules containing a pause that avoids the costly process of determining the optimal pause location in an online manner. We also evaluate our method on the subset sum problem, a problem of practical significance, and show that our method is able to achieve a 70% reduction in time-to-solution from a standard schedule containing no pause.

International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region (HPC Asia)•Jan 7, 2022•10 citations

Advantage of Pausing: Parameter Setting for Quantum Annealers

Zoe Gonzalez Izquierdo, Shon R. Grabbe, Husni Idris +3 more

Prior work showed the efficacy of pausing midanneal: such a pause improved the probability of success by orders of magnitude in a class of native problem instances and improved the time to solution in a class of embedded problem instances. A physics-based picture provides qualitative suggestions for where pausing midanneal is effective, for the interplay between annealing schedule parameters and other annealing properties and parameters such as embedding size and strength of the ferromagnetic coupling $|{J}_{F}|$, and for the conditions under which pausing can improve the time to solution. Here, through demonstrations on an updated annealing architecture that has higher connectivity than previous annealers, and on multiple embedded problem classes, we are able to confirm various aspects of this picture. We demonstrate the robustness of the optimal pause parameters across platforms and problem classes, explore how to set $|{J}_{F}|$ to optimize performance in different scenarios, and provide empirical evidence that short pauses trump longer overall annealing times in time to solution. We also identify the number of different coefficients in a problem as a predictor of problem hardness, and explore its interplay with the optimal $|{J}_{F}|$ and embedding size. Based on these results we are able to present qualitative guidelines for parameter setting in quantum annealers.

arXiv:2205.12936•Physical Review Applied•Nov 17, 2022•10 citations

Ferromagnetically Shifting the Power of Pausing

Zoe Gonzalez Izquierdo, Shon R. Grabbe, Stuart Hadfield +3 more

We study the interplay between quantum annealing parameters in embedded problems, providing both deeper insights into the physics of these devices and pragmatic recommendations to improve performance on optimization problems. We choose as our test case the class of bounded-degree minimum-spanning-tree problems. Through runs on a D-Wave quantum annealer, we demonstrate that pausing in a specific time window in the anneal provides improvement in the probability of success and in the time to solution for these problems. The time window is consistent across problem instances and its location is within the region suggested by prior theory and seen in previous results on native problems. An approach to enable gauge transformations for problems with the qubit coupling strength $J$ in an asymmetric range is presented and shown to significantly improve performance. We also confirm that the optimal pause location exhibits a shift with the magnitude of the ferromagnetic coupling, $|{J}_{F}|$, between physical qubits representing the same logical one. We extend the theoretical picture for pausing and thermalization in quantum annealing to the embedded case. This picture, along with perturbation-theory analysis and exact numerical results on small problems, confirms that the effective pause region moves earlier in the anneal as $|{J}_{F}|$ increases. It also suggests why pausing, while still providing significant benefit, has a less pronounced effect on embedded problems.

arXiv:2006.08526•Physical Review Applied•Apr 6, 2021•19 citations

Improving Quantum Annealing Performance on Embedded Problems

Michael Ryan Zielewski, Mulya Agung, Ryusuke Egawa +1 more

Recently, many researchers are investigating quantum annealing as a solver for real-world combinatorial optimization problems. However, due to the format of problems that quantum annealing solves and the structure of the physical annealer, these problems often require additional setup prior to solving. We study how these setup steps affect performance and provide insight into the interplay among them using the job-shop scheduling problem for our evaluation. We show that the empirical probability of success is highly sensitive to problem setup and that excess variables and large embeddings reduce performance. We then show that certain problem instances are unable to be solved without the use of additional post-processing methods. Finally, we investigate the effect of pausing during the anneal. Our results show that pausing within a certain time window can improve the probability of success, which is consistent with other work. However, we also show that the performance improvement due to pausing can be masked depending on properties of the embedding, and thus, special care must be taken for embedded problems.

Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations•Dec 1, 2020•6 citations

Improving quantum annealing of the ferromagnetic p -spin model through pausing

Gianluca Passarelli, V. Cataudella, Procolo Lucignano

The probability of success of quantum annealing can be improved significantly by pausing the annealer during its dynamics, exploiting thermal relaxation in a controlled fashion. In this paper, we investigate the effect of pausing the quantum annealing of the fully connected ferromagnetic $p$-spin model. This analytically solvable model has a searchlike behavior and is often used as a benchmark for the performances of quantum annealing. We numerically show that: (i) the optimal pausing point is 60% longer than the avoided crossing time for the analyzed instance, and (ii) at the optimal pausing point, we register a 45% improvement in the probability of success with respect to a quantum annealing with no pauses of the same duration. These results are in line with those observed experimentally for less connected models with the available quantum annealers. The observed improvement for the $p$-spin model can be up to two orders of magnitude with respect to an isolated quantum dynamics of the same duration.

arXiv:1902.06788•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 3, 2019•49 citations

Towards interpretable AI with quantum annealing feature selection

Francesco Aldo Venturelli, Emanuele Costa, Sikha O. K +3 more

Deep learning models are used in critical applications, in which mistakes can have serious consequences. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how and why models generate predictions. This understanding provides useful information to check whether the model is learning the right patterns, detect biases in the data, improve model design, and build systems that can be trusted. This work proposes a new method for interpreting Convolutional Neural Networks in image classification tasks. The approach works by selecting the most representative feature maps that contribute to each prediction. To solve this combinatorial problem, we encode it into a quantum constrained optimization problem and propose to solve it using quantum annealing. We evaluate our method against the state-of-the-art explainable AI techniques, specifically GradCAM and GradCAM++, and observe an improved class disentanglement, i.e. the model's decision boundaries become more distinct and its reasoning more transparent. This demonstrates that our approach enhances the quality of explanations, making it easier to understand which features the model relies on for specific predictions. In addition, we study the computational behavior of the quantum annealing algorithm. Specifically, we analyze the minimum energy gap of the system during computation and the probability that the algorithm finds the correct solution. These analyses provide theoretical insight into why the method works effectively in practice.

arXiv:2604.25649•Apr 28, 2026•0 citations
Despite increases in qubit count and connectivity in quantum annealers, a quantum speedup has yet to be observed for problems of practical significance. In order to further improve annealer performance, some researchers focus on tuning annealer parameters, such as the annealing schedule. In this work, we focus on pausing, an annealing schedule modification that has been shown to improve the probability of solving an optimization problem by orders of magnitude. However, a challenge associated with pausing is selecting an appropriate pause location, as pausing is only effective in problem-dependent regions and ineffective elsewhere. Moreover, there is little advice on how to determine where pausing is effective. Thus, pausing effectively is difficult and often inaccessible to the majority of users. To address these issues, we propose a data-driven method that leverages machine learning to predict optimal pause locations. First, we construct a dataset consisting of optimization problems and their corresponding optimal pause locations. The optimal pause locations are determined using spin-vector Monte Carlo, a method known to yield results similar to quantum annealing. Next, we train a convolutional neural network on this dataset, demonstrating its ability to distinguish between problem types and accurately predict the optimal pause location. Finally, we evaluate the model on multiple types of optimization problems. Our results show that the pause locations predicted by our method improve solution quality for all selected problem types. Additionally, our model can be pre-trained and easily distributed, making the power of pausing accessible to users unfamiliar with annealing schedule modifications.
Recent research has shown that alternative annealing schedules provide the means for improving performance in modern quantum annealing devices. One such type of schedule is forward annealing with a pause, in which there is a period of time when system evolution is paused. While the results from using this type of schedule have been promising, effectively using a pause is not a trivial task. One challenge associated with introducing a pause into the schedule is determining the point in the anneal at which the pause will start. Additionally, tuning the schedule in real-time requires a significant amount of time. A second challenge is that while a pause may increase the number of correct solutions returned from the annealer, the time-to-solution, a standard metric for measuring performance in quantum annealing, will not necessarily be improved. We propose a method for constructing annealing schedules containing a pause that avoids the costly process of determining the optimal pause location in an online manner. We also evaluate our method on the subset sum problem, a problem of practical significance, and show that our method is able to achieve a 70% reduction in time-to-solution from a standard schedule containing no pause.
Prior work showed the efficacy of pausing midanneal: such a pause improved the probability of success by orders of magnitude in a class of native problem instances and improved the time to solution in a class of embedded problem instances. A physics-based picture provides qualitative suggestions for where pausing midanneal is effective, for the interplay between annealing schedule parameters and other annealing properties and parameters such as embedding size and strength of the ferromagnetic coupling ∣JF∣|{J}_{F}|∣JF​∣, and for the conditions under which pausing can improve the time to solution. Here, through demonstrations on an updated annealing architecture that has higher connectivity than previous annealers, and on multiple embedded problem classes, we are able to confirm various aspects of this picture. We demonstrate the robustness of the optimal pause parameters across platforms and problem classes, explore how to set ∣JF∣|{J}_{F}|∣JF​∣ to optimize performance in different scenarios, and provide empirical evidence that short pauses trump longer overall annealing times in time to solution. We also identify the number of different coefficients in a problem as a predictor of problem hardness, and explore its interplay with the optimal ∣JF∣|{J}_{F}|∣JF​∣ and embedding size. Based on these results we are able to present qualitative guidelines for parameter setting in quantum annealers.
We study the interplay between quantum annealing parameters in embedded problems, providing both deeper insights into the physics of these devices and pragmatic recommendations to improve performance on optimization problems. We choose as our test case the class of bounded-degree minimum-spanning-tree problems. Through runs on a D-Wave quantum annealer, we demonstrate that pausing in a specific time window in the anneal provides improvement in the probability of success and in the time to solution for these problems. The time window is consistent across problem instances and its location is within the region suggested by prior theory and seen in previous results on native problems. An approach to enable gauge transformations for problems with the qubit coupling strength JJJ in an asymmetric range is presented and shown to significantly improve performance. We also confirm that the optimal pause location exhibits a shift with the magnitude of the ferromagnetic coupling, ∣JF∣|{J}_{F}|∣JF​∣, between physical qubits representing the same logical one. We extend the theoretical picture for pausing and thermalization in quantum annealing to the embedded case. This picture, along with perturbation-theory analysis and exact numerical results on small problems, confirms that the effective pause region moves earlier in the anneal as ∣JF∣|{J}_{F}|∣JF​∣ increases. It also suggests why pausing, while still providing significant benefit, has a less pronounced effect on embedded problems.
Recently, many researchers are investigating quantum annealing as a solver for real-world combinatorial optimization problems. However, due to the format of problems that quantum annealing solves and the structure of the physical annealer, these problems often require additional setup prior to solving. We study how these setup steps affect performance and provide insight into the interplay among them using the job-shop scheduling problem for our evaluation. We show that the empirical probability of success is highly sensitive to problem setup and that excess variables and large embeddings reduce performance. We then show that certain problem instances are unable to be solved without the use of additional post-processing methods. Finally, we investigate the effect of pausing during the anneal. Our results show that pausing within a certain time window can improve the probability of success, which is consistent with other work. However, we also show that the performance improvement due to pausing can be masked depending on properties of the embedding, and thus, special care must be taken for embedded problems.
The probability of success of quantum annealing can be improved significantly by pausing the annealer during its dynamics, exploiting thermal relaxation in a controlled fashion. In this paper, we investigate the effect of pausing the quantum annealing of the fully connected ferromagnetic ppp-spin model. This analytically solvable model has a searchlike behavior and is often used as a benchmark for the performances of quantum annealing. We numerically show that: (i) the optimal pausing point is 60% longer than the avoided crossing time for the analyzed instance, and (ii) at the optimal pausing point, we register a 45% improvement in the probability of success with respect to a quantum annealing with no pauses of the same duration. These results are in line with those observed experimentally for less connected models with the available quantum annealers. The observed improvement for the ppp-spin model can be up to two orders of magnitude with respect to an isolated quantum dynamics of the same duration.
Deep learning models are used in critical applications, in which mistakes can have serious consequences. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how and why models generate predictions. This understanding provides useful information to check whether the model is learning the right patterns, detect biases in the data, improve model design, and build systems that can be trusted. This work proposes a new method for interpreting Convolutional Neural Networks in image classification tasks. The approach works by selecting the most representative feature maps that contribute to each prediction. To solve this combinatorial problem, we encode it into a quantum constrained optimization problem and propose to solve it using quantum annealing. We evaluate our method against the state-of-the-art explainable AI techniques, specifically GradCAM and GradCAM++, and observe an improved class disentanglement, i.e. the model's decision boundaries become more distinct and its reasoning more transparent. This demonstrates that our approach enhances the quality of explanations, making it easier to understand which features the model relies on for specific predictions. In addition, we study the computational behavior of the quantum annealing algorithm. Specifically, we analyze the minimum energy gap of the system during computation and the probability that the algorithm finds the correct solution. These analyses provide theoretical insight into why the method works effectively in practice.