Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Molecular Biotechnology

Future Potential of Quantum Computing and Simulations in Biological Science

Soumen Pal, Manojit Bhattacharya, Snehasish Dash, Sang‐Soo Lee, Chiranjib Chakraborty

Published Sep 17, 2023• 38 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s12033-023-00863-3

Related papers

Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences

Prashant S. Emani, Jonathan Warrell, Alan Anticevic +14 more

arXiv:1911.07127•Nature Methods•Jan 4, 2021•164 citations

Quantum Biotechnology

Nicolas P. Mauranyapin, Alex Terrasson, Warwick P. Bowen

Abstract Quantum technologies leverage the laws of quantum physics to achieve performance advantages in applications ranging from computing to communications and sensing. They have been proposed to have a range of applications in biological science. This includes better microscopes and biosensors, improved simulations of molecular processes, and new capabilities to control the behavior of biomolecules and chemical reactions. Quantum effects are also predicted, with much debate, to have functional benefits in biology, for instance, allowing more efficient energy transport and improving the rate of enzyme catalysis. Conversely, the robustness of biological systems to disorder from their environment has led to proposals to use them as components within quantum technologies, for instance as light sources for quantum communication systems. Together, this breadth of prospective applications at the interface of quantum and biological science suggests that quantum physics will play an important role in stimulating future biotechnological advances. This review aims to provide an overview of this emerging field of quantum biotechnology, introducing current capabilities, future prospects, and potential areas of impact. The review is written to be accessible to the non‐expert and focuses on the four key areas of quantum‐enabled sensing, quantum‐enabled imaging, quantum biomolecular control, and quantum effects in biology.

arXiv:2111.02021•Advanced Quantum Technologies•Jul 7, 2022•30 citations

Quantum simulation meets quantum biology

Jianming Cai

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Jan 9, 2017•7 citations

Some considerations on quantum computing at sub-atomic scales and its impact in the future of Moore's law

Nicolas Francisco Lori, José Neves, Alex H. Blin +1 more

The contemporary development of Quantum Computers has opened new possibilities for computation improvements, but the limits of Moore's law validity are starting to show. We analyze here the possibility that miniaturization will continue to be the source of Moore's law validity in the near future, and our conclusion is that miniaturization is no longer a reliable answer for the future development of computer science, but instead we suggest that lateralization is the correct approach. By lateralization, we mean the use of biology as the correct format for the implementation of ubiquitous computerized systems, a format that might in many circumstances eschew miniaturization as an overly expensive useless advantage whereas in other cases miniaturization might play a key role. Thus, the future of computer science is not towards a miniaturization that goes from the atom-scale (its present application scale) towards the nucleus-scale, but rather in developing more integrated circuits at the micrometer to nanometer scale, so as to better mimic and interact with biological systems. We analyze some "almost sci-fi" approaches to the development of better computer systems near the Bekenstein bound limit, and unsurprisingly they fail to have any realistic feasibility. Then, we use the difference between the classical vs. quantum version of the Hammerstein-Clifford theorem to explain why biological systems eschewed quantum computation to represent the world but have chosen classical computation instead. Finally, we analyze examples of recent work which indicate future possibilities of integration between computers and biological systems. As a corollary of that choice by the biological systems, we propose that the predicted lateralization-driven evolution in computer science will not be based in quantum computers, but rather in classical computers.

Quantum Information and Computation•Feb 1, 2020•4 citations

Quantum Machine Learning for Biological Applications

Anushri Vijay, Harshita Bhargava, Astha Pareek +2 more

Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has transformed biological applications. In biological science, ML-based algorithms have also successfully handled large amounts of data. The use of ML-based AI approaches has switched applications from generalization to customization. Some recent trends in ML-/AI-based systems include recommendation systems, healthcare chatbots, and precision medicine, and achieving computational speed is always a challenge in such instances. The ML model training can be accelerated using quantum computing (QC), and more effective algorithms can be produced. QC can create an AI system that is optimized and capable of quickly finishing years of analysis. Theoretically, quantum computers could indeed efficiently simulate the entire problem, including interactions at the atomic level. Additionally, algorithmic advancements in quantum machine learning (QML) provide intriguing alternatives to traditional ML strategies that might be beneficial for the biochemical activities associated with the initial stages of drug discovery. Likewise, quantum hardware is also rapidly evolving to the point where perfect simulations are challenging to achieve even with the world’s most powerful supercomputers. This chapter will cover the classical machine learning techniques as well as the core concepts of quantum computing with respect to ML and DL. It will discuss the applications of quantum computing with respect to biological applications such as drug discovery, protein function prediction, and predicting interactions between drugs and targets. The chapter also includes several open-source tools which can be employed for quantum computing in different biological applications. It will also discuss various challenges related to quantum computing and its future prospects while dealing with complex biological problems.

Bioinformatics and Computational Biology•Nov 14, 2023•2 citations

Biological computation running on quantum computation

Koichiro Matsuno

Biosystems•Jun 25, 2021•5 citations
Abstract Quantum technologies leverage the laws of quantum physics to achieve performance advantages in applications ranging from computing to communications and sensing. They have been proposed to have a range of applications in biological science. This includes better microscopes and biosensors, improved simulations of molecular processes, and new capabilities to control the behavior of biomolecules and chemical reactions. Quantum effects are also predicted, with much debate, to have functional benefits in biology, for instance, allowing more efficient energy transport and improving the rate of enzyme catalysis. Conversely, the robustness of biological systems to disorder from their environment has led to proposals to use them as components within quantum technologies, for instance as light sources for quantum communication systems. Together, this breadth of prospective applications at the interface of quantum and biological science suggests that quantum physics will play an important role in stimulating future biotechnological advances. This review aims to provide an overview of this emerging field of quantum biotechnology, introducing current capabilities, future prospects, and potential areas of impact. The review is written to be accessible to the non‐expert and focuses on the four key areas of quantum‐enabled sensing, quantum‐enabled imaging, quantum biomolecular control, and quantum effects in biology.
The contemporary development of Quantum Computers has opened new possibilities for computation improvements, but the limits of Moore's law validity are starting to show. We analyze here the possibility that miniaturization will continue to be the source of Moore's law validity in the near future, and our conclusion is that miniaturization is no longer a reliable answer for the future development of computer science, but instead we suggest that lateralization is the correct approach. By lateralization, we mean the use of biology as the correct format for the implementation of ubiquitous computerized systems, a format that might in many circumstances eschew miniaturization as an overly expensive useless advantage whereas in other cases miniaturization might play a key role. Thus, the future of computer science is not towards a miniaturization that goes from the atom-scale (its present application scale) towards the nucleus-scale, but rather in developing more integrated circuits at the micrometer to nanometer scale, so as to better mimic and interact with biological systems. We analyze some "almost sci-fi" approaches to the development of better computer systems near the Bekenstein bound limit, and unsurprisingly they fail to have any realistic feasibility. Then, we use the difference between the classical vs. quantum version of the Hammerstein-Clifford theorem to explain why biological systems eschewed quantum computation to represent the world but have chosen classical computation instead. Finally, we analyze examples of recent work which indicate future possibilities of integration between computers and biological systems. As a corollary of that choice by the biological systems, we propose that the predicted lateralization-driven evolution in computer science will not be based in quantum computers, but rather in classical computers.
Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has transformed biological applications. In biological science, ML-based algorithms have also successfully handled large amounts of data. The use of ML-based AI approaches has switched applications from generalization to customization. Some recent trends in ML-/AI-based systems include recommendation systems, healthcare chatbots, and precision medicine, and achieving computational speed is always a challenge in such instances. The ML model training can be accelerated using quantum computing (QC), and more effective algorithms can be produced. QC can create an AI system that is optimized and capable of quickly finishing years of analysis. Theoretically, quantum computers could indeed efficiently simulate the entire problem, including interactions at the atomic level. Additionally, algorithmic advancements in quantum machine learning (QML) provide intriguing alternatives to traditional ML strategies that might be beneficial for the biochemical activities associated with the initial stages of drug discovery. Likewise, quantum hardware is also rapidly evolving to the point where perfect simulations are challenging to achieve even with the world’s most powerful supercomputers. This chapter will cover the classical machine learning techniques as well as the core concepts of quantum computing with respect to ML and DL. It will discuss the applications of quantum computing with respect to biological applications such as drug discovery, protein function prediction, and predicting interactions between drugs and targets. The chapter also includes several open-source tools which can be employed for quantum computing in different biological applications. It will also discuss various challenges related to quantum computing and its future prospects while dealing with complex biological problems.