Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science

Response : Quantum Mechanics and Freedom

Seymour S. Kety

Published Apr 21, 1961• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1126/science.133.3460.1289

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Freedom

Silvio Fiala

Science•Apr 21, 1961•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Freedom

Joseph Andriola

Science•Apr 21, 1961•0 citations

Mesoscopic Physics and the Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics

Y. Imry

We start by reviewing some interesting results in mesoscopic physics illustrating nontrivial insights on Quantum Mechanics. We then review the general principles of dephasing (sometimes called “decoherence”) of Quantum-Mechanical interference by coupling to the environment degrees of freedom. A particular recent example of dephasing by a current-carrying (nonequilibrium) system is then discussed in some detail. This system is itself a manifestly Quantum Mechanical one and this is another illustration of detection without the need for “classical observers” etc. We conclude by describing briefly a recent problem having to do with the orbital magnetic response of conduction electrons (another manifestly Quantum Mechanical property): The magnetic response of a normal layer (N) coating a superconducting cylinder (S). Some recent very intriguing experimental results on a giant paramagnetic component of this response are explained using special states in the normal layer. It is hoped that these discussions illustrate not only the vitality and interest of mesoscopic physics but also its extreme relevance to fundamental issues in Quantum Mechanics.

arXiv:cond-mat/9807306•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1998•12 citations

Precedence and freedom in quantum physics

Lee Smolin

A new interpretation of quantum mechanics is proposed according to which precedence, freedom and novelty play central roles. This is based on a modification of the postulates for quantum theory given by Masanes and Muller. We argue that quantum mechanics is uniquely characterized as the probabilistic theory in which individual systems have maximal freedom in their responses to experiment, given reasonable axioms for the behavior of probabilities in a physical theory. Thus, to the extent that quantum systems are free, in the sense of Conway and Kochen, there is a sense in which they are maximally free. We also propose that laws of quantum evolution arise from a principle of precedence, according to which the outcome of a measurement on a quantum system is selected randomly from the ensemble of outcomes of previous instances of the same measurement on the same quantum system. This implies that dynamical laws for quantum systems can evolve as the universe evolves, because new precedents are generated by the formation of new entangled states.

arXiv:1205.3707•May 16, 2012•8 citations

Comment on "Quantum mechanics for non-inertial observers"

Igor Pikovski, Magdalena Zych, Fabio Costa +1 more

In a recent paper (arXiv:1701.04298 [quant-ph]) Toroš, Großardt and Bassi claim that the potential necessary to support a composite particle in a gravitational field must necessarily cancel the relativistic coupling between internal and external degrees of freedom. As such a coupling is responsible for the gravitational redshift measured in numerous experiments, the above statement is clearly incorrect. We identify the simple mistake in the paper responsible for the incorrect claim.

arXiv:1702.06670•Feb 22, 2017•2 citations

Response : Quantum Mechanics: Not Mysterious

Yakir Aharonov, J. Anandan

Science•Nov 5, 1993•4 citations
We start by reviewing some interesting results in mesoscopic physics illustrating nontrivial insights on Quantum Mechanics. We then review the general principles of dephasing (sometimes called “decoherence”) of Quantum-Mechanical interference by coupling to the environment degrees of freedom. A particular recent example of dephasing by a current-carrying (nonequilibrium) system is then discussed in some detail. This system is itself a manifestly Quantum Mechanical one and this is another illustration of detection without the need for “classical observers” etc. We conclude by describing briefly a recent problem having to do with the orbital magnetic response of conduction electrons (another manifestly Quantum Mechanical property): The magnetic response of a normal layer (N) coating a superconducting cylinder (S). Some recent very intriguing experimental results on a giant paramagnetic component of this response are explained using special states in the normal layer. It is hoped that these discussions illustrate not only the vitality and interest of mesoscopic physics but also its extreme relevance to fundamental issues in Quantum Mechanics.
A new interpretation of quantum mechanics is proposed according to which precedence, freedom and novelty play central roles. This is based on a modification of the postulates for quantum theory given by Masanes and Muller. We argue that quantum mechanics is uniquely characterized as the probabilistic theory in which individual systems have maximal freedom in their responses to experiment, given reasonable axioms for the behavior of probabilities in a physical theory. Thus, to the extent that quantum systems are free, in the sense of Conway and Kochen, there is a sense in which they are maximally free. We also propose that laws of quantum evolution arise from a principle of precedence, according to which the outcome of a measurement on a quantum system is selected randomly from the ensemble of outcomes of previous instances of the same measurement on the same quantum system. This implies that dynamical laws for quantum systems can evolve as the universe evolves, because new precedents are generated by the formation of new entangled states.