Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computer Standards & Interfaces

Post-quantum secure group signature with verifier local revocation and backward unlinkability

Shuaining Gao, Xinjian Chen, Hongbo Li, Willy Susilo, Qiong Huang

Published Aug 30, 2023• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.csi.2023.103782

Related papers

Lattice-based group signature with verifier-local revocation

Wen Gao, Yupu Hu, Yanhua Zhang +1 more

Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science)•May 29, 2017•20 citations

Post-Quantum Secure Group Signatures

Laurens Porzenheim

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Post-quantum Adaptor Signatures with Strong Security from Cryptographic Group Actions

Ryann Cartor, Nathan Daly, Giulia Gaggero +3 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Verifier-local revocation group signatures with backward unlinkability from lattices

Yanhua Zhang, Ximeng Liu, Yupu Hu +2 more

For group signature (GS) supporting membership revocation, verifier-local revocation (VLR) mechanism seems to be a more flexible choice, because it requires only that verifiers download up-to-date revocation information for signature verification, and the signers are not involved. As a post-quantum secure cryptographic counterpart of classical number-theoretic cryptographic constructions, the first lattice-based VLR group signature (VLR-GS) was introduced by Langlois et al. (2014). However, none of the contemporary lattice-based VLR-GS schemes provide backward unlinkability (BU), which is an important property to ensure that previously issued signatures remain anonymous and unlinkable even after the corresponding signer (i.e., member) is revoked. In this study, we introduce the first lattice-based VLR-GS scheme with BU security (VLR-GS-BU), and thus resolve a prominent open problem posed by previous works. Our new scheme enjoys an $${\cal O}\left( {\log \,N} \right)$$ factor saving for bit-sizes of the group public-key (GPK) and the member’s signing secret-key, and it is free of any public-key encryption. In the random oracle model, our scheme is proven secure under two well-known hardness assumptions of the short integer solution (SIS) problem and learning with errors (LWE) problem.

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering•Jun 1, 2022•7 citations

Post-quantum secure identity-based signature achieving forward secrecy

Surbhi Shaw, Ratna Dutta

Journal of Information Security and Applications•Jul 19, 2022•6 citations

Lattice-based Group Signature Scheme with Verifier-local Revocation.

Adeline Roux-Langlois, San Ling, Khoa Nguyen +1 more

Abstract. Support of membership revocation is a desirable functionality for any group signature scheme. Among the known revocation approaches, verifier-local revocation (VLR) seems to be the most flexible one, because it only requires the verifiers to possess some up-to-date revocation information, but not the signers. All of the contemporary VLR group signatures operate in the bilinear map setting, and all of them will be insecure once quantum computers become a reality. In this work, we introduce the first lattice-based VLR group signature, and thus, the first such scheme that is believed to be quantum-resistant. In comparison with existing lattice-based group signatures, our scheme has several noticeable advantages: support of membership revocation, logarithmic-size signatures, and weaker security assumption. In the random oracle model, our scheme is proved to be secure based on the hardness of the SIVPÕ(n1.5) problem in general lattices- an assumption that is as weak as those of state-of-the-art lattice-based standard signatures. Moreover, our construction works without relying on encryption schemes, which is an intriguing feature for group signatures.

•Jan 1, 2014•3 citations
For group signature (GS) supporting membership revocation, verifier-local revocation (VLR) mechanism seems to be a more flexible choice, because it requires only that verifiers download up-to-date revocation information for signature verification, and the signers are not involved. As a post-quantum secure cryptographic counterpart of classical number-theoretic cryptographic constructions, the first lattice-based VLR group signature (VLR-GS) was introduced by Langlois et al. (2014). However, none of the contemporary lattice-based VLR-GS schemes provide backward unlinkability (BU), which is an important property to ensure that previously issued signatures remain anonymous and unlinkable even after the corresponding signer (i.e., member) is revoked. In this study, we introduce the first lattice-based VLR-GS scheme with BU security (VLR-GS-BU), and thus resolve a prominent open problem posed by previous works. Our new scheme enjoys an O(log⁡ N){\cal O}\left( {\log \,N} \right)O(logN) factor saving for bit-sizes of the group public-key (GPK) and the member’s signing secret-key, and it is free of any public-key encryption. In the random oracle model, our scheme is proven secure under two well-known hardness assumptions of the short integer solution (SIS) problem and learning with errors (LWE) problem.
Abstract. Support of membership revocation is a desirable functionality for any group signature scheme. Among the known revocation approaches, verifier-local revocation (VLR) seems to be the most flexible one, because it only requires the verifiers to possess some up-to-date revocation information, but not the signers. All of the contemporary VLR group signatures operate in the bilinear map setting, and all of them will be insecure once quantum computers become a reality. In this work, we introduce the first lattice-based VLR group signature, and thus, the first such scheme that is believed to be quantum-resistant. In comparison with existing lattice-based group signatures, our scheme has several noticeable advantages: support of membership revocation, logarithmic-size signatures, and weaker security assumption. In the random oracle model, our scheme is proved to be secure based on the hardness of the SIVPÕ(n1.5) problem in general lattices- an assumption that is as weak as those of state-of-the-art lattice-based standard signatures. Moreover, our construction works without relying on encryption schemes, which is an intriguing feature for group signatures.