A rigorous analysis is undertaken based on the analysis of both Galilean and Lorentz (Poincaré) invariance in field theories in general in order to (i) identify a unique analytical scheme for canonical pairs of Lagrangians, one of them having Galilean, the other one Poincaré invariance; and (ii) to obtain transition conditions for the state function purely from Hamilton’s principle and extended Noether’s theorem applied to the aforementioned symmetries. The general analysis is applied on Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon theory, identifying them as a canonical pair in the sense of (i) and exemplified for the scattering problem for both theories for a particle beam against a potential step in order to show that the transition conditions that result according to (ii) in a ‘natural’ way reproduce the well-known ‘methodical’ continuity conditions commonly found in the literature, at least in relevant cases, closing a relevant argumentation gap in quantum mechanical scattering problems.
A rigorous analysis is undertaken based on the analysis of both Galilean and Lorentz (Poincaré) invariance in field theories in general in order to (i) identify a unique analytical scheme for canonical pairs of Lagrangians, one of them having Galilean, the other one Poincaré invariance; and (ii) to obtain transition conditions for the state function purely from Hamilton’s principle and extended Noether’s theorem applied to the aforementioned symmetries. The general analysis is applied on Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon theory, identifying them as a canonical pair in the sense of (i) and exemplified for the scattering problem for both theories for a particle beam against a potential step in order to show that the transition conditions that result according to (ii) in a ‘natural’ way reproduce the well-known ‘methodical’ continuity conditions commonly found in the literature, at least in relevant cases, closing a relevant argumentation gap in quantum mechanical scattering problems.
According to our current understanding of quantum mechanics, a `measurement' violates unitarity. In other words as the act of measurement `resets' the probabilities described by the Schrödinger equation, in the very `moment' of the collapse of the wavefunction, conservation of probability does not hold. To make progress in our understanding of the measurement problem it is thus expected that one must encompass in a single equation both otherwise mutually-exclusive processes of measurement and unitary evolution. In this light, turning to the continuity equation, we realize the possibility that if we allow for existence of sources and sinks in the `fluid of probability' we get closer to such a theory by arriving at nonlinear generalizations of Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon equations. The generalized equations derived are then shown to satisfy all conditions that are expected from a proper generalization: simplification to their linear counterparts by a well-defined dynamical condition, and Galilean and Lorentz invariance.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.
The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.
Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.
The Hamilton-Jacobi method is generalized, both, in classical and relativistic mechanics. The implications in quantum mechanics are considered in the case of Klein-Gordon equation. We find that the wave functions of Klein-Gordon theory can be considered as describing the motion of an ensemble of particles that move under the action of the electromagnetic field alone, without quantum potentials, hidden uninterpreted variables, or zero point fields. The number of particles is not locally conserved.
We expose the Schrödinger quantum mechanics with traditional applications to Hydrogen atom. We discuss carefully the experimental and theoretical background for the introduction of the Schrödinger, Pauli and Dirac equations, as well as for the Maxwell equations. We explain in detail all basic theoretical concepts. We explain all details of the calculations and mathematical tools: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism for the systems with finite degree of freedom and for fields, Geometric Optics, the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and WKB approximation, Noether theory of invariants including the theorem on currents, four conservation laws (energy, momentum, angular momentum and charge), Lie algebra of angular momentum and spherical functions, scattering theory (limiting amplitude principle and limiting absorption principle), the Lienard-Wiechert formulas, Lorentz group and Lorentz formulas, Pauli theorem and relativistic covariance of the Dirac equation, etc. We give a detailed oveview of the conceptual development of the quantum mechanics, and expose main achievements of the ``old quantum mechanics'' in the form of exercises. One of our basic aim in writing this book, is an open and concrete discussion of the problem of a mathematical description of the following two fundamental quantum phenomena: i) Bohr's quantum transitions and ii) de Broglie's wave-particle duality. Both phenomena cannot be described by autonomous linear dynamical equations, and we give them a new mathematical treatment related with recent progress in the theory of global attractors of nonlinear hyperbolic PDEs.