Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Boundary Condition and the Auxiliary Phase in Feynman Path

Chung-Ru Lee

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.4547168

Related papers

Boundary Condition and the Auxiliary Phase in Feynman Path Integral

Chung-Ru Lee

arXiv:2207.06675•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Boundary conditions, symmetry breakdown and Feynman path integral

V. Janiš

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1982•0 citations

Born rule and Feynman path integral from a phase-consistency condition

Nakka Gurappa

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Boundary conditions: The path integral approach

M. Asorey, Jesús Clemente-Gallardo, J. M. Munõz-Castañeda

The path integral approach to quantum mechanics requires a substantial generalisation to describe the dynamics of systems confined to bounded domains. Nonlocal boundary conditions can be introduced in Feynman's approach by means of boundary amplitude distributions and complex phases to describe the quantum dynamics in terms of the classical trajectories. The different prescriptions involve only trajectories reaching the boundary and correspond to different choices of boundary conditions of selfadjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian. One dimensional particle dynamics is analysed in detail.

arXiv:0712.4353•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Nov 1, 2007•12 citations

The Path Integral as TUT Projection: A GMaTT Interpretation of Feynman's Sum Over Histories

Soon Hee@Bungsuh Yeo

Abstract Feynman's path integral formulation describes quantum propagation as a sum over all possible paths, weighted by a phase factor e^{iS/ℏ}. The classical path emerges via constructive interference of paths with stationary action. We reinterpret this mechanism within the Generalized Mass as Twisted Time (GMaTT) framework. The phase factor is identified as the accumulated phase difference Δφ of a G₂ root vector rotating around the √α axis. The condition for constructive interference is shown to be equivalent to the TUT (TwistUntwist Threshold) coherence condition |δφ| < √α. We clarify that the TUT window is not a dynamic laboratory filter but a static geometric boundary condition of the phase space. Classical paths are not "chosen" by the particle; they are the trajectories that maintain phase coherence within the TUT threshold during propagation. This provides a geometric origin for the path integral and the principle of least action, grounding Feynman's sum in the pregeometric phase geometry of GMaTT.

•Jul 15, 2026•0 citations

Feynman path integrals and the corresponding method of stationary phase

Sergio A Albeverio, Raphael J. Høegh-Krohn

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•29 citations
The path integral approach to quantum mechanics requires a substantial generalisation to describe the dynamics of systems confined to bounded domains. Nonlocal boundary conditions can be introduced in Feynman's approach by means of boundary amplitude distributions and complex phases to describe the quantum dynamics in terms of the classical trajectories. The different prescriptions involve only trajectories reaching the boundary and correspond to different choices of boundary conditions of selfadjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian. One dimensional particle dynamics is analysed in detail.
Abstract Feynman's path integral formulation describes quantum propagation as a sum over all possible paths, weighted by a phase factor e^{iS/ℏ}. The classical path emerges via constructive interference of paths with stationary action. We reinterpret this mechanism within the Generalized Mass as Twisted Time (GMaTT) framework. The phase factor is identified as the accumulated phase difference Δφ of a G₂ root vector rotating around the √α axis. The condition for constructive interference is shown to be equivalent to the TUT (TwistUntwist Threshold) coherence condition |δφ| < √α. We clarify that the TUT window is not a dynamic laboratory filter but a static geometric boundary condition of the phase space. Classical paths are not "chosen" by the particle; they are the trajectories that maintain phase coherence within the TUT threshold during propagation. This provides a geometric origin for the path integral and the principle of least action, grounding Feynman's sum in the pregeometric phase geometry of GMaTT.