Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Time-Refraction with Moving Time-Interfaces

Ohad Segal, Eran Lustig, Soham Saha, Eliyahu Bordo, Sarah Nahar Chowdhury, Moshe-Ishay Cohen, Avner Fleischer, Mustafa Goksu Ozlu, Alexandra E. Boltasseva, Oren Cohen, Vladimir M. Shalaev, Mordechai Segev

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We present an experimental study of time-refraction with propagating time-interfaces. We observe the special spectral signature of time-reflections generated by these interfaces, paving the way for their experimental demonstration in the optical regime.
DOI
10.1364/cleo_fs.2023.ftu3d.2

Related papers

Time-Refraction Optics at Single Cycle Modulation

Eran Lustig, Ohad Segal, Soham Saha +9 more

We present an experimental study of optical time-refraction in single-cycle time-interfaces. Specifically, we study the propagation of a probe pulse through a sample undergoing large refractive index changes induced by an intense ultra-short modulator pulse.

•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Experimental Demonstration of Reflection and Refraction of Optical Pulses from Temporal Boundaries

Bethany Little, Brent W. Plansinis, Govind Prasad Agrawal +1 more

We experimentally implement the proposal of Plansinis et al.[PRL 115, 183910 (2015)] using slow light in Rubidium vapor. Time-dependent frequency shifts on probe pulses behave like angles in the analogous spatial reflection and refraction from classical optics.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Temporal Analog of Reflection and Refraction at a Temporal Boundary

Brent W. Plansinis, William R. Donaldson, Govind Prasad Agrawal

We show numerically and analytically that an optical pulse that crosses over a temporal boundary in a dispersive medium acts as a temporal analog of the spatial reflection and refraction at a dielectric interface.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2015•1 citation

Temporal Interfaces and Present-Moment Selection: Time-Reflection Metamaterials and Delayed-Choice Erasure as Concrete Bridges to Time-Scalar Field Theory

Jordan Gabriel Farrell

Recent laboratory demonstrations of temporal interfaces (“time mirrors”) and the longstudied delayed-choice / quantum-eraser class of experiments are frequently described in popular accounts as if present actions literally modify the past. This paper provides a strict physical account of both effects, emphasizing (i) temporal boundary conditions in engineered media that generate time-reflected components and frequency translation without macroscopic time reversal, and (ii) conditional interference recovery in coincidence ensembles that preserves nosignaling and does not permit controllable messaging to the past. We then map these two experimental pillars onto Time-Scalar Field Theory (TSFT), in which time is modeled as a dynamical scalar field Θ(x, t) and electromagnetism and gravitation arise as distinct deformation modes of temporal flow. We show that temporal-interface scattering constitutes an experimentally realized analog of TSFT time-refraction signatures and that delayed-choice phenomena naturally admit a coherence-selection interpretation consistent with TSFT’s present-moment stability criteria. Finally, we propose falsifiable TSFT-specific predictions linking engineered temporal modulation to measurable phase offsets and mixed-mode coupling signatures.

•Jan 27, 2025•0 citations

Speculation on Photon Entropy during Refraction

Francesco R. Ruggeri

Entropy is usually associated with probabilities (e.g. Shannon’s entropy= S = - Sum over i Probability(i) ln{Probability(i)} which suggests there is some uncertainty in the problem, captured by S. Entropy, however, also seems to be associated with the evolution of a system in time. Historically, entropy was introduced through the first law of thermodynamics: dE = TdS - PdV, before there was any formula involving probabilities. Furthermore, a constant entropy, which applies to an adiabatic process, means the process is reversible in time. In this note, we consider the case of a photon which is represented by a quantum wavefunction exp(-iEt+ip dot r), but is also reversible in the case of reflection/refraction, even from a moving interface. The wavefunction, we argue, is associated with probability in space-time and so there should be associated entropies (as we have argued in (1)), but at the same entropy should be constant as the motion is reversible. In (1), we considered Shannon’s entropy for t and x and used A1 |cos(Et)| and A2 |cos(px)| over half a cycle as probabilities. We introduce a third entropy associated with time, but not E in this note. Here, we focus on the case of refraction. For a stationary interface, E is conserved, but p changes. Thus there is a change in the uncertainty in x, but not in t and the process is reversible, with time S being constant.( The first law suggests that S=constant, which is keeping with time entropy, but not with spatial (x) entropy.) We suggest that there may be multiple types of entropy associated with different observables. We next consider the case of reflection/refraction from a moving mirror/interface. In such a case, neither E nor p is conserved for the photon. Both time and spatial (x) entropy change, but the process is reversible and entropy should be constant. We suggest there exists an entropy which is constant, but is based on: -Et+ p dot r = t |p| (-E/|p| + unit vector dot r/t) where r/t vector is minus the velocity of the moving interface and the unit vector points in the direction of momentum p. We consider an associated entropy and the first law of thermodynamics.

•Sep 29, 2023•0 citations

Time-Refraction in Classical and Quantum Optics

José Tito Mendonça

Tempo-Refração em Óptica Clássica e Quântica

•Jan 1, 2024•1 citation
Recent laboratory demonstrations of temporal interfaces (“time mirrors”) and the longstudied delayed-choice / quantum-eraser class of experiments are frequently described in popular accounts as if present actions literally modify the past. This paper provides a strict physical account of both effects, emphasizing (i) temporal boundary conditions in engineered media that generate time-reflected components and frequency translation without macroscopic time reversal, and (ii) conditional interference recovery in coincidence ensembles that preserves nosignaling and does not permit controllable messaging to the past. We then map these two experimental pillars onto Time-Scalar Field Theory (TSFT), in which time is modeled as a dynamical scalar field Θ(x, t) and electromagnetism and gravitation arise as distinct deformation modes of temporal flow. We show that temporal-interface scattering constitutes an experimentally realized analog of TSFT time-refraction signatures and that delayed-choice phenomena naturally admit a coherence-selection interpretation consistent with TSFT’s present-moment stability criteria. Finally, we propose falsifiable TSFT-specific predictions linking engineered temporal modulation to measurable phase offsets and mixed-mode coupling signatures.
Entropy is usually associated with probabilities (e.g. Shannon’s entropy= S = - Sum over i Probability(i) ln{Probability(i)} which suggests there is some uncertainty in the problem, captured by S. Entropy, however, also seems to be associated with the evolution of a system in time. Historically, entropy was introduced through the first law of thermodynamics: dE = TdS - PdV, before there was any formula involving probabilities. Furthermore, a constant entropy, which applies to an adiabatic process, means the process is reversible in time. In this note, we consider the case of a photon which is represented by a quantum wavefunction exp(-iEt+ip dot r), but is also reversible in the case of reflection/refraction, even from a moving interface. The wavefunction, we argue, is associated with probability in space-time and so there should be associated entropies (as we have argued in (1)), but at the same entropy should be constant as the motion is reversible. In (1), we considered Shannon’s entropy for t and x and used A1 |cos(Et)| and A2 |cos(px)| over half a cycle as probabilities. We introduce a third entropy associated with time, but not E in this note. Here, we focus on the case of refraction. For a stationary interface, E is conserved, but p changes. Thus there is a change in the uncertainty in x, but not in t and the process is reversible, with time S being constant.( The first law suggests that S=constant, which is keeping with time entropy, but not with spatial (x) entropy.) We suggest that there may be multiple types of entropy associated with different observables. We next consider the case of reflection/refraction from a moving mirror/interface. In such a case, neither E nor p is conserved for the photon. Both time and spatial (x) entropy change, but the process is reversible and entropy should be constant. We suggest there exists an entropy which is constant, but is based on: -Et+ p dot r = t |p| (-E/|p| + unit vector dot r/t) where r/t vector is minus the velocity of the moving interface and the unit vector points in the direction of momentum p. We consider an associated entropy and the first law of thermodynamics.