Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

The legacy of Thomas Young

Andrew Robinson

Published Jun 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A response to the report of a “time” version of Young’s double-slit experiment, generating fringes in frequency rather than space.
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/36/06/26

Related papers

Young’s double-slits goes temporal

Edwin Cartlidge

A “time” version of the famous experiment generates fringes in frequency rather than space, as Edwin Cartlidge explains.

Physics World•May 1, 2023•0 citations

Young double-slit experiment, Heisenberg uncertainty principle and Cantorian space-time

Mohamed Saladin El Naschie

Chaos Solitons & Fractals•Mar 1, 1994•20 citations

Intensity in Young's Double-Slit Experiment

Helen Neal

APS•Nov 1, 2000•0 citations

Young's Double-slit Experiment, correction on the misconception.

Harsha Kumar Suriyaarachchi

In Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDE) and improved versions, waves causing interference travel different distances.As speed of light is constant, waves require different time spans to reach the point of interference.Thereby, if the waves are generated simultaneously at the slits/source, they cannot meet on the screen anywhere outside the mid-line.Formation of fringes is commonly interpreted as interference caused by the meeting (super-positioning) of two waves generated simultaneously.The reality is that fringes are formed by interference of waves generated at different times.However, unless impacted by other phenomena, two waves generated at different times converging to form fringes, as this paper shows, will mandatorily come in same phase to the interference point, producing constructive interference.Interference observed, however, is not only constructive.The effect on the phase of waves while bending (diffraction) is also to be considered.Consequently, it addresses three phenomena causing phase shifts: (1)different starting times,(2)bending at slits, and (3)distances traveled (In contrast, the first two are overlooked by the conventional approach).(Dirac and Feynman Path Integral methods on quantum particles have different approaches).The paper reveals the widespread misconception in the analysis of YDE and would impact the wave/particle and other YDE interpretations.

•Dec 5, 2023•0 citations

Chapter 6. Young's Two-Slit Experiment with Electrons

Mark P. Silverman

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 1998•0 citations

Interference

Jonathan Allday

Science, as it is generally described at school, starts with experimental data. Scientists then have to find some hypothesis which explains these results. Using this hypothesis, a prediction is made about what might happen in a slightly different experiment. The double-slit experiment is a modified version of the setup first used by Thomas Young in 1801. Young’s version is a classic experiment that, at the time, seemed to have settled the dispute between wave and particle views of light decisively in favour of waves. The idea that particles might display some wavelike properties dates to the mid-1920s when a young PhD student called Louis De Broglie was thinking about the dual wave/particle nature of light. A quantum mechanical description of the double-slit experiment must involve a set of amplitudes governing the passage of an electron through the slits to the far detector.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 21, 2022•0 citations
In Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDE) and improved versions, waves causing interference travel different distances.As speed of light is constant, waves require different time spans to reach the point of interference.Thereby, if the waves are generated simultaneously at the slits/source, they cannot meet on the screen anywhere outside the mid-line.Formation of fringes is commonly interpreted as interference caused by the meeting (super-positioning) of two waves generated simultaneously.The reality is that fringes are formed by interference of waves generated at different times.However, unless impacted by other phenomena, two waves generated at different times converging to form fringes, as this paper shows, will mandatorily come in same phase to the interference point, producing constructive interference.Interference observed, however, is not only constructive.The effect on the phase of waves while bending (diffraction) is also to be considered.Consequently, it addresses three phenomena causing phase shifts: (1)different starting times,(2)bending at slits, and (3)distances traveled (In contrast, the first two are overlooked by the conventional approach).(Dirac and Feynman Path Integral methods on quantum particles have different approaches).The paper reveals the widespread misconception in the analysis of YDE and would impact the wave/particle and other YDE interpretations.
Science, as it is generally described at school, starts with experimental data. Scientists then have to find some hypothesis which explains these results. Using this hypothesis, a prediction is made about what might happen in a slightly different experiment. The double-slit experiment is a modified version of the setup first used by Thomas Young in 1801. Young’s version is a classic experiment that, at the time, seemed to have settled the dispute between wave and particle views of light decisively in favour of waves. The idea that particles might display some wavelike properties dates to the mid-1920s when a young PhD student called Louis De Broglie was thinking about the dual wave/particle nature of light. A quantum mechanical description of the double-slit experiment must involve a set of amplitudes governing the passage of an electron through the slits to the far detector.