Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Concrete Security from Worst-Case to Average-Case Lattice Reductions

Joel Gärtner

Published Jan 1, 2023• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-37679-5_15

Related papers

Structural Lattice Reduction: Generalized Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions and Homomorphic Cryptosystems

Nicolas Gama, Malika Izabachène, Phong Q. Nguyễn +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2016•55 citations

Worst-case to average-case reductions for module lattices

Adeline Roux-Langlois, Damien Stehlé

Designs Codes and Cryptography•Feb 25, 2014•654 citations

Concurrently Secure Identification Schemes Based on the Worst-Case Hardness of Lattice Problems

Akinori Kawachi, Keisuke Tanaka, Keita Xagawa

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2008•217 citations

Concurrently Secure Identification Schemes Based on the Worst-Case Hardness of Lattice Problems

亮周 河内, Akinori Kawachi, KEISUKE TANAKA +2 more

•Dec 1, 2008•0 citations

Making NTRU as Secure as Worst-Case Problems over Ideal Lattices

Damien Stehlé, Ron Steinfeld

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•444 citations

Classical reduction of gap SVP to LWE: A concrete security analysis

Palash Sarkar, Subhadip Singha

Regev (2005) introduced the learning with errors (LWE) problem and showed a quantum reduction from a worst case lattice problem to LWE. Building on the work of Peikert (2009), a classical reduction from the gap shortest vector problem to LWE was obtained by Brakerski et al. (2013). A concrete security analysis of Regev's reduction by Chatterjee et al. (2016) identified a huge tightness gap. The present work performs a concrete analysis of the tightness gap in the classical reduction of Brakerski et al. It turns out that the tightness gap in the Brakerski et al. classical reduction is even larger than the tightness gap in the quantum reduction of Regev. This casts doubts on the implication of the reduction to security assurance of practical cryptosystems.

Advances in Mathematics of Communications•Apr 7, 2021•2 citations
Regev (2005) introduced the learning with errors (LWE) problem and showed a quantum reduction from a worst case lattice problem to LWE. Building on the work of Peikert (2009), a classical reduction from the gap shortest vector problem to LWE was obtained by Brakerski et al. (2013). A concrete security analysis of Regev's reduction by Chatterjee et al. (2016) identified a huge tightness gap. The present work performs a concrete analysis of the tightness gap in the classical reduction of Brakerski et al. It turns out that the tightness gap in the Brakerski et al. classical reduction is even larger than the tightness gap in the quantum reduction of Regev. This casts doubts on the implication of the reduction to security assurance of practical cryptosystems.