The aim of the present paper is to analyze the problem of the relationship between\nchemistry and physics, by focusing on the widely discussed case of the atomic orbitals.\nWe will begin by remembering the difference between the physical and the chemical interpretation\nof the concept of orbital. Then, we will refer to the claim made in 1999 that\natomic orbitals have been directly imaged for the first time. On this basis, we will analyze\nthe problem from a new approach, by comparing the concept of orbital used in physics with\nthe concept of orbital used in chemistry. Such an analysis will allow us to argue for an ontological\npluralism that admits the coexistence of different ontologies without priorities or\nmetaphysical privileges. From this philosophical framework, the concepts of chemical orbital\nand physical orbital correspond to two different ontologies. As a consequence, chemical orbitals\nare real entities belonging to the ontology of molecular chemistry, and can be observed\nlike any other entity not belonging to the quantum mechanical ontology.
The aim of the present paper is to analyze the problem of the relationship between\nchemistry and physics, by focusing on the widely discussed case of the atomic orbitals.\nWe will begin by remembering the difference between the physical and the chemical interpretation\nof the concept of orbital. Then, we will refer to the claim made in 1999 that\natomic orbitals have been directly imaged for the first time. On this basis, we will analyze\nthe problem from a new approach, by comparing the concept of orbital used in physics with\nthe concept of orbital used in chemistry. Such an analysis will allow us to argue for an ontological\npluralism that admits the coexistence of different ontologies without priorities or\nmetaphysical privileges. From this philosophical framework, the concepts of chemical orbital\nand physical orbital correspond to two different ontologies. As a consequence, chemical orbitals\nare real entities belonging to the ontology of molecular chemistry, and can be observed\nlike any other entity not belonging to the quantum mechanical ontology.
espanolQuimica cuantica es la rama de la quimica que se ocupa principalmente de la aplicacion de la mecanica cuantica a los sistemas quimicos a un nivel molecular. Gracias a su peculiar posicion entre la quimica y la fisica, ha comenzado a ser una disciplina de interes para los filosofos de la quimica. Sin embargo, en el ambito filosofico, la quimica cuantica se ha estudiado principalmente, desde una perspectiva historica o desde cuestiones metodologicas. En contraste, la pregunta que guia este articulo es: ?que clase de entidades son estudiadas por la quimica cuantica? Para desarrollar mi argumento, discutire, en primer lugar, la importancia de las preguntas ontologicas. Despues, considerare en que medida la aproximacion Born-Oppenheimer y el concepto de electron de la quimica cuantica se ajustan al contexto teorico cuantico. Finalmente, discutire algunas cuestiones acerca de a que se refiere la quimica cuantica. EnglishQuantum chemistry is the branch of chemistry whose pri-mary focus is the application of quantum mechanics to chemi-cal systems at the molecular level. Precisely due to its peculiar position between chemistry and physics, in the last times it has begun to engage the interest of the philosophers of chemistry. Nevertheless, in this philosophical field, quantum chemistry has been studied mainly from a historical viewpoint or from a per-spective interested on methodological issues. By contrast, the question that will guide this article is: what kind of ontic items are those studied by quantum chemistry? In order to develop the argumentation, first the relevance of the ontological questions will be addressed. Then, it will be considered in what measure the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the quantum-chem-istry concept of electron fit in the quantum theoretical context. Finally, some issues about what quantum chemistry refers to will be discussed.
The concept of atomic and molecular orbitals has been a fundamental pillar in modern chemistry, shedding light on the structures and reactivity of chemical compounds. This article examines the evolution and significance of orbital theory, its applications in chemistry, and the ongoing debate about the existence of orbitals from both physics and chemistry perspectives. Philosophical aspects related to the ontology of orbitals are explored, emphasizing the complex interplay between mathematical abstractions and tangible reality. The multifaceted nature of orbitals, their role in quantum mechanics, and their implications for understanding the quantum realm are discussed. While the debate surrounding the ontological status of orbitals remains ongoing, it highlights the profound nature of inquiries into the fundamental essence of reality. This exploration underscores the significance of continuous research and discourse in advancing our understanding of these fundamental constituents of the quantum world.
The main thrust of the paper involves a theoretical and philosophical analysis of the claim made in September 1999 that atomic orbitals have been directly imaged for the first time. After a brief account of the recent claims the paper reviews the development of the orbit and later orbital concepts and analyzes the theoretical status of atomic orbitals. The conclusion is that contrary to these claims, atomic orbitals have not in fact been observed. The non-referring nature of modern atomic orbitals is discussed in the context of Laudan's writings on realism, the success of theories, and whether or not scientific terms refer. I conclude that the failure to observe orbitals is a good prima facie case for divorcing the success of theories from the question of whether their central terms refer. The added relevance of this case is that it concerns a current and highly successful theory. Finally, the relevance of this ‘floating model’ to contemporary discussions on scientific models is briefly considered.
Quantum chemistry is the branch of chemistry whose primary focus is the application of quantum mechanics to chemical systems at the molecular level. Precisely due to its peculiar position between chemistry and physics, in the last times it has begun to engage the interest of the philosophers of chemistry. Nevertheless, in this philosophical field, quantum chemistry has been studied mainly from a historical viewpoint or from a perspective interested on methodological issues. By contrast, the question that will guide this article is: what kind of ontic items are those studied by quantum chemistry? In order to develop the argumentation, first the relevance of the ontological questions will be addressed. Then, it will be considered in what measure the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the quantum-chemistry concept of electron fit in the quantum theoretical context. Finally, some issues about what quantum chemistry refers to will be discussed.
El análisis del concepto de orbital permite argumentar –en oposición a una propuesta reciente en filosofía de la ciencia– que no es posible defender la autonomía ontológica de la realidad química respecto de la física, sobre la base de una ruptura conceptual entre una interpretación química del concepto y otra propia de la mecánica cuántica. Esto es así porque no existen tales interpretaciones distintas del concepto de orbital, sino que, por el contrario, este concepto en química estructural pertenece a la química cuántica y, por tanto, no se diferencia del concepto involucrado en mecánica cuántica.
According to a traditional assumption, in principle chemistry could be derived from physics because chemical entities are nothing else than very complex physical entities. This assumption counts against the autonomy of chemistry as a scientific discipline or, at least, supports its secondary position with respect to physics. In this paper we review the arguments used for and against the idea that chemistry is nothing else than a branch of physics. In particular, we consider the status of chemical entities in the light of the discussions around the supposed visualization of orbitals. On this basis, we defend the autonomous existence of the chemical world. Keywords: Molecular chemistry, Quantum mechanics, Reduction, Orbitals, Wavefunction, Semiclassical-electrons, Born-Oppenheimer approximation, Autonomous Existence, medieval alchemy, Dirac's words, phenomenological science, macroscopic phenomena, multicomponent systems, billiard-ball, secondary science, illuminating metaphor, Existence of Orbitals, SchrOdinger equation, contextuality of quantum mechanics, hypothetical superposition, quasi-classical WKB, unacceptable self-contradiction