Mathematics, Physics, and Nature

Melinda Baldwin

Mohammed I. Sanduk

Abstract Euler’s formula is a pure mathematical formula. In spite of its nonphysical nature, the form of this formula has a genuine fundamental role in quantum mechanics, but with no physical reason for this role. Philosophically, Heisenberg has proposed Kantian ideas in physics like “nature in itself”, unobservable nature, and “nature as appears”. He proposed a possibility of mathematical formulation for a system in nature in itself. In the present work, a mathematical model of rolling circles in real space has been proposed as a model for a system in nature in itself. Observation process acts as a transformation of the system to a model in observable nature. Partial observation transforms the real position vector of a point in that system to a form similar to the Euler’s formula. That causes the appearance of the imaginary unit. Interestingly, the transformed real kinematical forms exhibit similarity with the forms of relativistic quantum mechanics.

Detlef Dürr, Stefan Teufel

Mohammed I. Sanduk

Abstract Euler’s formula is a pure mathematical formula. In spite of its nonphysical nature, the form of this formula has a genuine fundamental role in quantum mechanics, but with no physical reason for this role. Philosophically, Heisenberg has proposed Kantian ideas in physics like “nature in itself”, unobservable nature, and “nature as appears”. He proposed a possibility of mathematical formulation for a system in nature in itself. In the present work, a mathematical model of rolling circles in real space has been proposed as a model for a system in nature in itself. Observation process acts as a transformation of the system to a model in observable nature. Partial observation transforms the real position vector of a point in that system to a form similar to the Euler’s formula. That causes the appearance of the imaginary unit. Interestingly, the transformed real kinematical forms exhibit similarity with the forms of relativistic quantum mechanics.

Dennis Dieks

Roger Schlafly

Much of modern theoretical physics assumes that the true nature of reality is mathematics. This is a great mistake. The assumption underlies most of the paradoxes of quantum mechanics, and has no empirical justification. Accepting that the assumption is wrong will allow physics and mathematics to progress as distinct disciplines.