Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Dirac and Jordan commit “sin squared”: second quantization and the beginning of quantum field theory

Robert Golub, S. K. Lamoreaux

Published Feb 28, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract We continue the discussion of the abstract transformation theory which led to the development of second quantization. Jordan had already suggested (in the foundational papers on matrix mechanics by Heisenberg, Born, and himself) that the electromagnetic field should be represented by a matrix, i.e., quantized. Dirac eventually took up this idea and proposed quantizing the field by treating the field as an operator. Jordan (with others) showed how the same technique could be applied to Bosons and then Fermions. This established the roots of quantum field theory. It also cleared up some of the interpretational issues of the time.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198822189.003.0012

Related papers

Second Quantization and Representation Theory

Edward M. Corson

The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1946•2 citations

Dirac

Jonathan Allday

Between 1925 and 1933, Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac made a series of crucial contributions to the development of quantum mechanics and set much of the agenda for fundamental research through the following decades. Any one of his insights would have been sufficient to ensure his lasting recognition in physics, but together they amount to the work of a genius. In 1925 Dirac published a paper building on Heisenberg’s outline of a mathematical structure for quantum theory. Dirac’s next two papers came out in 1927 and developed the theory to describe the interaction between electromagnetic waves and atoms. This work set the foundations of quantum field theory and developed the technique called ‘second quantization’. Between 1932 and 1933, Dirac wrote three more papers on quantum field theory, managing to cast it in a fashion that made its consistency with relativity apparent.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 21, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics as a Classical Theory VIII: Second Quantization

L. S. F. Olavo

We continue in this paper our program of rederiving all quantum mechanical formalism from the classical one. We now turn our attention to the derivation of the second quantized equations, both for integral and half-integral spins. We then show that all the quantum results may be derived using our approach and also show the interpretation suggested by this derivation. This paper may be considered as a first approach to the study of the quantum field theory beginning by the same classical ideas we are supporting since the first paper of this series.

arXiv:quant-ph/9511028•Nov 21, 1995•0 citations

Introductory Considerations

John von Neumann

This chapter presents the origins of the transformation theory and related concepts. It shows how, in 1925, a procedure initiated by Werner Heisenberg was developed by himself, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, and a little later by Paul Dirac, into a new system of quantum theory—the first complete system of quantum theory which physics has possessed. A little later Erwin Schrödinger developed the “wave mechanics” from an entirely different starting point. This accomplished the same ends, and soon proved to be equivalent to the Heisenberg, Born, Jordan, and Dirac system. On the basis of the Born statistical interpretation of the quantum theoretical description of nature, it was possible for Dirac and Jordan to join the two theories into one, the “transformation theory,” in which they make possible a grasp of physical problems which is especially simple mathematically.

Princeton University Press eBooks•Feb 27, 2018•0 citations

Born--Jordan Quantization and the Equivalence of Matrix and Wave Mechanics

Maurice A. de Gosson

The aim of the famous Born and Jordan 1925 paper was to put Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a firm mathematical basis. Born and Jordan showed that if one wants to ensure energy conservation in Heisenberg's theory it is necessary and sufficient to quantize observables following a certain ordering rule. One apparently unnoticed consequence of this fact is that Schrödinger's wave mechanics cannot be equivalent to Heisenberg's more physically motivated matrix mechanics unless its observables are quantized using this rule, and not the more symmetric prescription proposed by Weyl in 1926, which has become the standard procedure in quantum mechanics. This observation confirms the superiority of Born-Jordan quantization, as already suggested by Kauffmann. We also show how to explicitly determine the Born--Jordan quantization of arbitrary classical variables, and discuss the conceptual advantages in using this quantization scheme. We finally suggest that it might be possible to determine the correct quantization scheme by using the results of weak measurement experiments.

arXiv:1405.2519•May 11, 2014•1 citation

The invention of quantum mechanics—matrix mechanics

Robert Golub, S. K. Lamoreaux

Abstract Driven by the idea that a physical theory should only deal with observable quantities, Werner Heisenberg, a young post-doc working with Max Born in Göttingen, who had earlier done his Ph.D. work under Sommerfeld in Munich, was led to introduce a new type of object which represented the transitions between Bohr-Sommerfeld orbits. Max Born realized and recognized these objects as matrices. Together with Pascual Jordan, another post-doc, they worked out a complete theory, matrix mechanics. They completed this work in a few months. We discuss the role of matrix mechanics in the development of quantum mechanics.

•Feb 28, 2023•0 citations
Abstract We continue the discussion of the abstract transformation theory which led to the development of second quantization. Jordan had already suggested (in the foundational papers on matrix mechanics by Heisenberg, Born, and himself) that the electromagnetic field should be represented by a matrix, i.e., quantized. Dirac eventually took up this idea and proposed quantizing the field by treating the field as an operator. Jordan (with others) showed how the same technique could be applied to Bosons and then Fermions. This established the roots of quantum field theory. It also cleared up some of the interpretational issues of the time.
The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.
Between 1925 and 1933, Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac made a series of crucial contributions to the development of quantum mechanics and set much of the agenda for fundamental research through the following decades. Any one of his insights would have been sufficient to ensure his lasting recognition in physics, but together they amount to the work of a genius. In 1925 Dirac published a paper building on Heisenberg’s outline of a mathematical structure for quantum theory. Dirac’s next two papers came out in 1927 and developed the theory to describe the interaction between electromagnetic waves and atoms. This work set the foundations of quantum field theory and developed the technique called ‘second quantization’. Between 1932 and 1933, Dirac wrote three more papers on quantum field theory, managing to cast it in a fashion that made its consistency with relativity apparent.
We continue in this paper our program of rederiving all quantum mechanical formalism from the classical one. We now turn our attention to the derivation of the second quantized equations, both for integral and half-integral spins. We then show that all the quantum results may be derived using our approach and also show the interpretation suggested by this derivation. This paper may be considered as a first approach to the study of the quantum field theory beginning by the same classical ideas we are supporting since the first paper of this series.
This chapter presents the origins of the transformation theory and related concepts. It shows how, in 1925, a procedure initiated by Werner Heisenberg was developed by himself, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, and a little later by Paul Dirac, into a new system of quantum theory—the first complete system of quantum theory which physics has possessed. A little later Erwin Schrödinger developed the “wave mechanics” from an entirely different starting point. This accomplished the same ends, and soon proved to be equivalent to the Heisenberg, Born, Jordan, and Dirac system. On the basis of the Born statistical interpretation of the quantum theoretical description of nature, it was possible for Dirac and Jordan to join the two theories into one, the “transformation theory,” in which they make possible a grasp of physical problems which is especially simple mathematically.
The aim of the famous Born and Jordan 1925 paper was to put Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a firm mathematical basis. Born and Jordan showed that if one wants to ensure energy conservation in Heisenberg's theory it is necessary and sufficient to quantize observables following a certain ordering rule. One apparently unnoticed consequence of this fact is that Schrödinger's wave mechanics cannot be equivalent to Heisenberg's more physically motivated matrix mechanics unless its observables are quantized using this rule, and not the more symmetric prescription proposed by Weyl in 1926, which has become the standard procedure in quantum mechanics. This observation confirms the superiority of Born-Jordan quantization, as already suggested by Kauffmann. We also show how to explicitly determine the Born--Jordan quantization of arbitrary classical variables, and discuss the conceptual advantages in using this quantization scheme. We finally suggest that it might be possible to determine the correct quantization scheme by using the results of weak measurement experiments.
Abstract Driven by the idea that a physical theory should only deal with observable quantities, Werner Heisenberg, a young post-doc working with Max Born in Göttingen, who had earlier done his Ph.D. work under Sommerfeld in Munich, was led to introduce a new type of object which represented the transitions between Bohr-Sommerfeld orbits. Max Born realized and recognized these objects as matrices. Together with Pascual Jordan, another post-doc, they worked out a complete theory, matrix mechanics. They completed this work in a few months. We discuss the role of matrix mechanics in the development of quantum mechanics.