Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Physica Sinica

Self-testing criteria for preparing-measuring qubit system

Yukun Wang, Zeyang Li, Kang Xu, Zizheng Wang

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Self-testing is the high-level security verification of a claimed quantum device, confirming the quantum states prepared in the device and the measurements performed based solely on the observed statistics. The statistical correlations can realize the self-testing of the quantum system in the preparing-and-measuring scenario. However, most of previous studies focused on the self-testing of shared entangled states between devices, at present only a few researches are presented and the existing work can only simultaneously self-test the states and measurements when some witness inequalities reach a maximum violation. We focus on four-state preparation and the selected scenarios of two measurements. In this scenario, Armin Tavakoli et al. [Tavakoli A, Kaniewski J, Vértesi T, Rosset D, Brunner N 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062307] have put forward a criterion based on the dimensional witness violation inequality which can achieve BB84 particles and corresponding Pauli measurements. However, in addition to the maximum violation of the inequality, any statistics with deviation from the maximum deviation cannot be self-tested. Besides, only the BB84 particle preparation and measurements system can be self-tested with that criterion, resulting in a large number of four-state preparation and two measurement systems that cannot be self-tested. Therefore, in this work, in addition to the maximum violation of that dimension inequality, we directly focus on the full observed statistics and further propose some new criteria for self-testing qubit quantum systems in the preparing-and-measiuring scenarios. And the self-testing criteria are proven in an ideal case. We construct a local isometry by using the constructions commonly used in device-independent cases, exchange the target system with the additional system, and realize the self-testing of more qubit state sets and measurement sets than BB84 particles. This meets the requirements for practical experiments to realize various tasks by different quantum state sets. In addition, we perform a robust analysis of the proposed criteria and use fidelity to describe the closeness of the state to the ideal state of the auxiliary system. Finally, an improved dimensional-dependent NPA method is used to optimize the lower bound of the robustness, making the new criteria practical under experimental noise. We use the YALIMP software package in MATLAB and the solver SEDUMI to solve this optimization problem. The present research increases the diversity of qubit state preparations and self-testing of measurement system, which is beneficial to the actual self-testing of different non-entangled single quantum systems.

DOI
10.7498/aps.72.20222431

Related papers

Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario

Armin Tavakoli, Jędrzej Kaniewski, Tamás Vértesi +2 more

The goal of self-testing is to characterize an a priori unknown quantum system based solely on measurement statistics, i.e., using an uncharacterized measurement device. Here we develop self-testing methods for quantum prepare-and-measure experiments, thus not necessarily relying on entanglement and/or violation of a Bell inequality. We present noise-robust techniques for self-testing sets of quantum states and measurements, assuming an upper bound on the Hilbert space dimension. We discuss in detail the case of a $2\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1$ random access code with qubits, for which we provide analytically optimal self-tests. The simplicity and noise robustness of our methods should make them directly applicable to experiments.

arXiv:1801.08520•Physical Review A•Dec 6, 2018•120 citations

Towards minimal self-testing of qubit states and measurements in prepare-and-measure scenarios

Gábor Drótos, Károly F. Pál, Abdelmalek Taoutioui +1 more

Abstract Self-testing is a promising approach to certifying quantum states or measurements. Originally, it relied solely on the outcome statistics of the measurements involved in a device-independent (DI) setup. Extra physical assumptions about the system make the setup semi-DI. In the latter approach, we consider a prepare-and-measure scenario in which the dimension of the mediating particle is assumed to be two. In a setup involving four (three) preparations and three (two) projective measurements in addition to the target, we exemplify how to self-test any four- (three-) outcome extremal positive operator-valued measure using a linear witness. One of our constructions also achieves self-testing of any number of states with the help of as many projective measurements as the dimensionality of the space spanned by the corresponding Bloch vectors. These constructions are conjectured to be minimal in terms of the number of preparations and measurements required. In addition, we implement one of our prepare-and-measure constructionson IBM and IonQ quantum processors and certify the existence of a complex qubit Hilbert space based on the data obtained from these experiments.

arXiv:2406.08661•New Journal of Physics•May 21, 2024•3 citations

Experimentally Robust Self-testing for Bipartite and Tripartite Entangled States

Wen-Hao Zhang, Geng Chen, Xing-Xiang Peng +9 more

Self-testing is a method with which a classical user can certify the state and measurements of quantum systems in a device-independent way. In particular, self-testing of entangled states is of great importance in quantum information processing. An understandable example is that the maximal violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality necessarily implies that the bipartite system shares a singlet. One essential question in self-testing is that, when one observes a nonmaximum violation, how far is the tested state from the target state (which maximally violates a certain Bell inequality)? The answer to this question describes the robustness of the used self-testing criterion, which is highly important in a practical sense. Recently, J. Kaniewski derived two analytic self-testing bounds for bipartite and tripartite systems. In this Letter, we experimentally investigate these two bounds with high-quality two-qubit and three-qubit entanglement sources. The results show that these bounds are valid for various entangled states that we prepared. Thereby, a proof-of-concept demonstration of robust self-testing is achieved, which improves on the previous results significantly.

arXiv:1804.01375•Physical Review Letters•Dec 13, 2018•31 citations

Device-independent self-testing of unsharp measurements

Prabuddha Roy, A. K. Pan

Abstract Semi-device-independent certification of an unsharp instrument has recently been demonstrated (2019 New J. Phys. 21 083034) based on the sequential sharing of quantum advantages in a prepare-measure communication game by assuming the system to be qubit. In this work, we provide device-independent (DI) self-testing of the unsharp instrument through the quantum violation of two Bell inequalities where the devices are uncharacterized and the dimension of the system remains unspecified. We introduce an elegant sum-of-squares approach to derive the dimension-independent optimal quantum violation of Bell inequalities which plays a crucial role. Note that the standard Bell test cannot self-test the post-measurement states and consequently cannot self-test unsharp instrument. The sequential Bell test possess the potential to self-test an unsharp instrument. We demonstrate that there exists a trade-off between the maximum sequential quantum violations of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality, and they form an optimal pair that enables the DI self-testing of the entangled state, the observables, and the unsharpness parameter. Further, we extend our study to the case of elegant Bell inequality and we argue that it has two classical bounds—the local bound and the non-trivial preparation non-contextual bound, lower than the local bound. Based on the sharing of preparation contextuality by three independent sequential observers, we demonstrate the DI self-testing of two unsharpness parameters. Since an actual experimental scenario involves losses and imperfection, we demonstrate robustness of our certification to noise.

arXiv:2311.04485•New Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2023•16 citations

Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3 → 1 random access code*

Shi-Hui Wei, Fen-Zhuo Guo, Xinhui Li +1 more

Recently, Tavakoli et al. proposed a self-testing scheme in the prepare-and-measure scenario, showing that self-testing is not necessarily based on entanglement and violation of a Bell inequality [Phys. Rev. A 98 062307 (2018)]. They realized the self-testing of preparations and measurements in an <?CDATA $N\to 1$?> N → 1 ( <?CDATA $N\ge 2$?> N ≥ 2 ) random access code (RAC), and provided robustness bounds in a <?CDATA $2\to 1$?> 2 → 1 RAC. Since all <?CDATA $N\to 1$?> N → 1 RACs with shared randomness are combinations of <?CDATA $2\to 1$?> 2 → 1 and <?CDATA $3\to 1$?> 3 → 1 RACs, the <?CDATA $3\to 1$?> 3 → 1 RAC is just as important as the <?CDATA $2\to 1$?> 2 → 1 RAC. In this paper, we find a set of preparations and measurements in the <?CDATA $3\to 1$?> 3 → 1 RAC, and use them to complete the robustness self-testing analysis in the prepare-and-measure scenario. The method is robust to small but inevitable experimental errors.

Chinese Physics B•Jul 1, 2019•4 citations

Robust and Versatile Black-Box Certification of Quantum Devices

Tzyh Haur Yang, Tamás Vértesi, Jean-Daniel Bancal +2 more

Self-testing refers to the fact that, in some quantum devices, both states and measurements can be assessed in a black-box scenario, on the sole basis of the observed statistics, i.e., without reference to any prior device calibration. Only a few examples of self-testing are known, and they just provide nontrivial assessment for devices performing unrealistically close to the ideal case. We overcome these difficulties by approaching self-testing with the semidefinite programing hierarchy for the characterization of quantum correlations. This allows us to improve dramatically the robustness of previous self-testing schemes; e.g., we show that a Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt violation larger than 2.57 certifies a singlet fidelity of more than 70%. In addition, the versatility of the tool brings about self-testing of hitherto impossible cases, such as the robust self-testing of nonmaximally entangled two-qutrit states in the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu scenario.

arXiv:1406.7127•Physical Review Letters•Jul 22, 2014•131 citations
Self-testing is the high-level security verification of a claimed quantum device, confirming the quantum states prepared in the device and the measurements performed based solely on the observed statistics. The statistical correlations can realize the self-testing of the quantum system in the preparing-and-measuring scenario. However, most of previous studies focused on the self-testing of shared entangled states between devices, at present only a few researches are presented and the existing work can only simultaneously self-test the states and measurements when some witness inequalities reach a maximum violation. We focus on four-state preparation and the selected scenarios of two measurements. In this scenario, Armin Tavakoli et al. [Tavakoli A, Kaniewski J, Vértesi T, Rosset D, Brunner N 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062307] have put forward a criterion based on the dimensional witness violation inequality which can achieve BB84 particles and corresponding Pauli measurements. However, in addition to the maximum violation of the inequality, any statistics with deviation from the maximum deviation cannot be self-tested. Besides, only the BB84 particle preparation and measurements system can be self-tested with that criterion, resulting in a large number of four-state preparation and two measurement systems that cannot be self-tested. Therefore, in this work, in addition to the maximum violation of that dimension inequality, we directly focus on the full observed statistics and further propose some new criteria for self-testing qubit quantum systems in the preparing-and-measiuring scenarios. And the self-testing criteria are proven in an ideal case. We construct a local isometry by using the constructions commonly used in device-independent cases, exchange the target system with the additional system, and realize the self-testing of more qubit state sets and measurement sets than BB84 particles. This meets the requirements for practical experiments to realize various tasks by different quantum state sets. In addition, we perform a robust analysis of the proposed criteria and use fidelity to describe the closeness of the state to the ideal state of the auxiliary system. Finally, an improved dimensional-dependent NPA method is used to optimize the lower bound of the robustness, making the new criteria practical under experimental noise. We use the YALIMP software package in MATLAB and the solver SEDUMI to solve this optimization problem. The present research increases the diversity of qubit state preparations and self-testing of measurement system, which is beneficial to the actual self-testing of different non-entangled single quantum systems.
The goal of self-testing is to characterize an a priori unknown quantum system based solely on measurement statistics, i.e., using an uncharacterized measurement device. Here we develop self-testing methods for quantum prepare-and-measure experiments, thus not necessarily relying on entanglement and/or violation of a Bell inequality. We present noise-robust techniques for self-testing sets of quantum states and measurements, assuming an upper bound on the Hilbert space dimension. We discuss in detail the case of a $2\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1$ random access code with qubits, for which we provide analytically optimal self-tests. The simplicity and noise robustness of our methods should make them directly applicable to experiments.
Abstract Self-testing is a promising approach to certifying quantum states or measurements. Originally, it relied solely on the outcome statistics of the measurements involved in a device-independent (DI) setup. Extra physical assumptions about the system make the setup semi-DI. In the latter approach, we consider a prepare-and-measure scenario in which the dimension of the mediating particle is assumed to be two. In a setup involving four (three) preparations and three (two) projective measurements in addition to the target, we exemplify how to self-test any four- (three-) outcome extremal positive operator-valued measure using a linear witness. One of our constructions also achieves self-testing of any number of states with the help of as many projective measurements as the dimensionality of the space spanned by the corresponding Bloch vectors. These constructions are conjectured to be minimal in terms of the number of preparations and measurements required. In addition, we implement one of our prepare-and-measure constructionson IBM and IonQ quantum processors and certify the existence of a complex qubit Hilbert space based on the data obtained from these experiments.
Self-testing is a method with which a classical user can certify the state and measurements of quantum systems in a device-independent way. In particular, self-testing of entangled states is of great importance in quantum information processing. An understandable example is that the maximal violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality necessarily implies that the bipartite system shares a singlet. One essential question in self-testing is that, when one observes a nonmaximum violation, how far is the tested state from the target state (which maximally violates a certain Bell inequality)? The answer to this question describes the robustness of the used self-testing criterion, which is highly important in a practical sense. Recently, J. Kaniewski derived two analytic self-testing bounds for bipartite and tripartite systems. In this Letter, we experimentally investigate these two bounds with high-quality two-qubit and three-qubit entanglement sources. The results show that these bounds are valid for various entangled states that we prepared. Thereby, a proof-of-concept demonstration of robust self-testing is achieved, which improves on the previous results significantly.
Abstract Semi-device-independent certification of an unsharp instrument has recently been demonstrated (2019 New J. Phys. 21 083034) based on the sequential sharing of quantum advantages in a prepare-measure communication game by assuming the system to be qubit. In this work, we provide device-independent (DI) self-testing of the unsharp instrument through the quantum violation of two Bell inequalities where the devices are uncharacterized and the dimension of the system remains unspecified. We introduce an elegant sum-of-squares approach to derive the dimension-independent optimal quantum violation of Bell inequalities which plays a crucial role. Note that the standard Bell test cannot self-test the post-measurement states and consequently cannot self-test unsharp instrument. The sequential Bell test possess the potential to self-test an unsharp instrument. We demonstrate that there exists a trade-off between the maximum sequential quantum violations of the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality, and they form an optimal pair that enables the DI self-testing of the entangled state, the observables, and the unsharpness parameter. Further, we extend our study to the case of elegant Bell inequality and we argue that it has two classical bounds—the local bound and the non-trivial preparation non-contextual bound, lower than the local bound. Based on the sharing of preparation contextuality by three independent sequential observers, we demonstrate the DI self-testing of two unsharpness parameters. Since an actual experimental scenario involves losses and imperfection, we demonstrate robustness of our certification to noise.
Recently, Tavakoli et al. proposed a self-testing scheme in the prepare-and-measure scenario, showing that self-testing is not necessarily based on entanglement and violation of a Bell inequality [Phys. Rev. A 98 062307 (2018)]. They realized the self-testing of preparations and measurements in an <?CDATA N→1N\to 1N→1?> N → 1 ( <?CDATA N≥2N\ge 2N≥2?> N ≥ 2 ) random access code (RAC), and provided robustness bounds in a <?CDATA 2→12\to 12→1?> 2 → 1 RAC. Since all <?CDATA N→1N\to 1N→1?> N → 1 RACs with shared randomness are combinations of <?CDATA 2→12\to 12→1?> 2 → 1 and <?CDATA 3→13\to 13→1?> 3 → 1 RACs, the <?CDATA 3→13\to 13→1?> 3 → 1 RAC is just as important as the <?CDATA 2→12\to 12→1?> 2 → 1 RAC. In this paper, we find a set of preparations and measurements in the <?CDATA 3→13\to 13→1?> 3 → 1 RAC, and use them to complete the robustness self-testing analysis in the prepare-and-measure scenario. The method is robust to small but inevitable experimental errors.
Self-testing refers to the fact that, in some quantum devices, both states and measurements can be assessed in a black-box scenario, on the sole basis of the observed statistics, i.e., without reference to any prior device calibration. Only a few examples of self-testing are known, and they just provide nontrivial assessment for devices performing unrealistically close to the ideal case. We overcome these difficulties by approaching self-testing with the semidefinite programing hierarchy for the characterization of quantum correlations. This allows us to improve dramatically the robustness of previous self-testing schemes; e.g., we show that a Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt violation larger than 2.57 certifies a singlet fidelity of more than 70%. In addition, the versatility of the tool brings about self-testing of hitherto impossible cases, such as the robust self-testing of nonmaximally entangled two-qutrit states in the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu scenario.