Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in computational intelligence

Phase Space Quantization II: Statistical Ideas

Carlos Alberto Alcalde, Kanishka Tyagi

Published Jan 1, 2023• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-19-9530-9_4

Related papers

Phase Space Quantization I: Geometrical Ideas

Carlos Alberto Alcalde, Kanishka Tyagi

Studies in computational intelligence•Jan 1, 2023•7 citations

Magnetic quantization over Riemannian manifolds

Mihail Vladimirovich Karasev, T. A. Osborn

We demonstrate that Weyl's pioneering idea (1918) to intertwine metric and magnetic fields into a single joint connection can be naturally realized, on the phase space level, by the gauge-invariant quantization of the cotangent bundle with magnetic symplectic form. Quantization, for systems over a noncompact Riemannian configuration manifold, may be achieved by the introduction of a magneto-metric analog of the Stratonovich quantizer — a family of invertible, selfadjoint operators representing quantum δ functions. Based on the quantizer, we construct a generalized Wigner transform that maps Hilbert–Schmidt operators into L2 phase-space functions. The algebraic properties of the quantizer allow one to extract a family of symplectic reflections, which are then used to (i) derive a simple, explicit, and geometrically invariant formula for the noncommutative product of functions on phase space, and (ii) construct a magneto-metric connection on phase space. The classical limit of this product is given by the usual multiplication of functions (zeroth-order term), the magnetic Poisson bracket (first-order term), and by the magneto-metric connection (second-order term).PACS Nos.: 02.40.-k, 11.10.Nx

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 15, 2006•0 citations

OVERVIEW OF PHASE-SPACE QUANTIZATION

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Dec 1, 2005•1 citation

From classical to quantum mechanics: “How to translate physical ideas into mathematical language”

Hervé Bergeron

Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0102084•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2001•12 citations

Quantization from First Principles: The Structural Origin of ℏ and Spin from Phase Topology

Maksym Altunin

Planck’s constant h has long been introduced axiomatically in quantum mechanics, with its numerical value fixed empirically. Yet its structural necessity and intrinsic relation to the topology of phase space remain unresolved. In this work we develop a phase-ontological framework — the Omega-model — in which monodromy provides the fundamental mechanism of quantization. The structural chain is established as: Topology → Monodromy → Quantization Rules → h as universal coherence threshold.Within this perspective, h is not derived as a numerical constant but identified as a universal unit of minimal coherent action that calibrates the model’s internal parameters. This formulation yields a unified topological explanation for (i) the inevitability of quantized action and (ii) the dichotomy of bosonic versus fermionic statistics, interpreted as trivial and nontrivial monodromy, respectively. Consistency of the coherence criterion with foundational quantum experiments and even recent high-energy anomalies demonstrates that the Omega-model offers a coherent bridge between topology, phase coherence, and the structural foundations of quantum theory.

•Aug 20, 2025•0 citations

Phase space quantization and the uncertainty principle

Maurice A. de Gosson

Physics Letters A•Sep 22, 2003•43 citations
We demonstrate that Weyl's pioneering idea (1918) to intertwine metric and magnetic fields into a single joint connection can be naturally realized, on the phase space level, by the gauge-invariant quantization of the cotangent bundle with magnetic symplectic form. Quantization, for systems over a noncompact Riemannian configuration manifold, may be achieved by the introduction of a magneto-metric analog of the Stratonovich quantizer — a family of invertible, selfadjoint operators representing quantum δ functions. Based on the quantizer, we construct a generalized Wigner transform that maps Hilbert–Schmidt operators into L2 phase-space functions. The algebraic properties of the quantizer allow one to extract a family of symplectic reflections, which are then used to (i) derive a simple, explicit, and geometrically invariant formula for the noncommutative product of functions on phase space, and (ii) construct a magneto-metric connection on phase space. The classical limit of this product is given by the usual multiplication of functions (zeroth-order term), the magnetic Poisson bracket (first-order term), and by the magneto-metric connection (second-order term).PACS Nos.: 02.40.-k, 11.10.Nx
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
Planck’s constant h has long been introduced axiomatically in quantum mechanics, with its numerical value fixed empirically. Yet its structural necessity and intrinsic relation to the topology of phase space remain unresolved. In this work we develop a phase-ontological framework — the Omega-model — in which monodromy provides the fundamental mechanism of quantization. The structural chain is established as: Topology → Monodromy → Quantization Rules → h as universal coherence threshold.Within this perspective, h is not derived as a numerical constant but identified as a universal unit of minimal coherent action that calibrates the model’s internal parameters. This formulation yields a unified topological explanation for (i) the inevitability of quantized action and (ii) the dichotomy of bosonic versus fermionic statistics, interpreted as trivial and nontrivial monodromy, respectively. Consistency of the coherence criterion with foundational quantum experiments and even recent high-energy anomalies demonstrates that the Omega-model offers a coherent bridge between topology, phase coherence, and the structural foundations of quantum theory.