Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America

Quantum measurement theory for an electron-shelving experiment

H. J. Carmichael

Published Jan 1, 1988• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The observation of quantum jumps in a Dehmelt electron-shelving scheme was made two years ago.1 Prior to these experiments considerable theoretical discussion was addressed to the question of whether the turn-on and turn-off of fluorescence, as described by Cook and Kimble,2 would actually occur. This discussion focused on photon statistics. It was taken to be self-evident that a prolonged cessation of fluorescence from the strong transition implied that the atom had jumped and now resided in the shelved state. This is surely correct but with some qualification. What observational information leads to the conclusion that the electron is shelved? It is the appearance of an abnormally long time interval without recording a single photoelectron at the detector monitoring the strong fluorescence. But how long is abnormally long? What is the time resolution of our quantum jump? I calculate the reduced atomic state following a photoelectric detection event, conditioned on the requirement that no subsequent photoelectron has been observed. For sufficiently long times without recording a subsequent photoelectron the atomic state collapses to the shelved state with high (but not unit) probability. The waiting time required for a confident judgment that the atom is in the shelved state is calculated as a function of transition rates and detector efficiency.

DOI
10.1364/oam.1988.tua1

Related papers

Observation of quantum jumps in a single atom

Jonas Bergquist, Randall G. Hulet, Wayne M. Itano +1 more

One of the experiments made possible by the trapping and cooling of a single atom is to observe the quantum jumps to a metastable state in the atom by monitoring the resonance fluorescence of a strong transition in which at least one of the states is coupled to the metastable state. When the atomic electron moves to the metastable state, the fluorescence from the strongly driven transition disappears. When the electron drops back into the strongly driven transition, the fluorescence abruptly returns. Statistical analysis of these random interruptions to the fluorescence signal implies photon antibunching in the emission of the weak photon.

International Laser Science Conference•Jan 1, 1986•32 citations

Quantum jumps in atomic systems

P. Zoller, Monika A. M. Marte, Daniel F. Walls

We consider a three-level atomic system driven strongly on one transition and weakly on the other. The excited state on the weak transition is assumed to be metastable. We give an analysis of the fluorescence from the strong transition in terms of the elementary probability density ${p}_{[0}$,t)(${\mathrm{t}}_{1}$,${t}_{2}$,..., ${t}_{n}$) which gives us the probability density that exactly n photons are emitted at times ${t}_{1}$,${t}_{2}$,...,${t}_{n}$ by the atom in the time interval [0,t). We show that ${p}_{[0}$,t) essentially factorizes into products of conditional densities c\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}(\ensuremath{\tau}) that, given a photon is emitted at time zero, the next photon emission occurs at time \ensuremath{\tau}. This enables a simulation of the individual photon emissions to be given which shows directly the existence of prolonged dark windows in the fluorescence corresponding to the shelving of the electron in the metastable state or ``quantum jumps.''

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1987•270 citations

Possibility of quantum jumps

Axel Schenzle, R. G. De Voe, Richard G. Brewer

A quantum-statistical theory is developed for a single-atom, three-state quantum system where a strong (1-3) and a weak (2-3) transition are driven resonantly by an incoherent field. From a second-order correlation function of the fluorescence intensity, it is concluded that a quantum jump can occur, in the sense that the single atom can undergo large fluctuations between a state of full emission in the strong transition to a state of no emission when the electron is shelved in the metastable state (2).

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1986•97 citations

Macroscopic quantum jumps in a single atom

Axel Schenzle, Richard G. Brewer

A single-atom optical clock proposed over ten years ago utilizes an amplification scheme which only recently was recognized as a novel problem in quantum statistics. The atom, a three-state system, has two coupled transitions that are driven continuously by two external fields, one being an allowed transition (1\ensuremath{\leftrightarrows}3) and the other a forbidden transition (2\ensuremath{\leftrightarrows}3) where \ensuremath{\Vert}3〉 is the lowest state. It has been argued that the weak transition, which is difficult to detect, could be monitored by the presence or absence of spontaneous emission of the strong transition. Thus, when the atom is shelved in the metastable state \ensuremath{\Vert}2〉, the strong transition is extinguished, but when the atom executes a single quantum jump (2\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3), it triggers a succession of perhaps a million quantum jumps (macroscopic quantum jumps) in the strong transition, an amplification that can be detected easily. This intuitive argument for alternating bright and dark intervals assumes, however, that the atom is always in an eigenstate. Should the atom be in a superposition state, because of coherent excitation, one could imagine that the weak transition would merely reduce the intensity of the strong transition slightly. This issue is resolved, in favor of the first intuitive argument, by calculating the photon-counting statistics, the probability W(n,T) of observing precisely n photon-counting events in a collection T in a quantum-mechanically consistent way. The results cannot be described by classical statistics. A compact analytic form is obtained for W(n,T) by considering the entire hierarchy of correlation functions where the emission interval peaks sharply about a particular n with a Poisson distribution and can be comparable in length to the darkness interval (n=0) while the other values of n display vanishingly small probabilities.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1986•93 citations

Do quantum jumps occur at well-defined moments of time?

George S. Greenstein, Arthur Zajonc

Shelved atom experiments appear to show clear evidence for quantum jumps. We use a gedanken interference experiment to demonstrate that a fundamental temporal ambiguity in the photon time-of-emission occurs in such transitions.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1995•45 citations

Quantum jumps in a three-level system

Juha Javanainen

According to the usual interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurement of an observable yields its eigenvalue. Extrapolation of classical reasoning then suggests that at every instant of time the quantum system actually is in one of the eigenstates of the observable, and as time goes on it executes random jumps between the states. In this spirit, Cook and Kimble1 have recently elaborated Dehmelt’s suggestion2 that fluorescence from a laser-driven two-level system weakly coupled to a third state may turn on and off when the atom jumps between the active two-level system and the inactive third state.

•Jun 9, 1986•0 citations
The observation of quantum jumps in a Dehmelt electron-shelving scheme was made two years ago.1 Prior to these experiments considerable theoretical discussion was addressed to the question of whether the turn-on and turn-off of fluorescence, as described by Cook and Kimble,2 would actually occur. This discussion focused on photon statistics. It was taken to be self-evident that a prolonged cessation of fluorescence from the strong transition implied that the atom had jumped and now resided in the shelved state. This is surely correct but with some qualification. What observational information leads to the conclusion that the electron is shelved? It is the appearance of an abnormally long time interval without recording a single photoelectron at the detector monitoring the strong fluorescence. But how long is abnormally long? What is the time resolution of our quantum jump? I calculate the reduced atomic state following a photoelectric detection event, conditioned on the requirement that no subsequent photoelectron has been observed. For sufficiently long times without recording a subsequent photoelectron the atomic state collapses to the shelved state with high (but not unit) probability. The waiting time required for a confident judgment that the atom is in the shelved state is calculated as a function of transition rates and detector efficiency.
One of the experiments made possible by the trapping and cooling of a single atom is to observe the quantum jumps to a metastable state in the atom by monitoring the resonance fluorescence of a strong transition in which at least one of the states is coupled to the metastable state. When the atomic electron moves to the metastable state, the fluorescence from the strongly driven transition disappears. When the electron drops back into the strongly driven transition, the fluorescence abruptly returns. Statistical analysis of these random interruptions to the fluorescence signal implies photon antibunching in the emission of the weak photon.
We consider a three-level atomic system driven strongly on one transition and weakly on the other. The excited state on the weak transition is assumed to be metastable. We give an analysis of the fluorescence from the strong transition in terms of the elementary probability density p[0{p}_{[0}p[0​,t)(t1{\mathrm{t}}_{1}t1​,t2{t}_{2}t2​,..., tn{t}_{n}tn​) which gives us the probability density that exactly n photons are emitted at times t1{t}_{1}t1​,t2{t}_{2}t2​,...,tn{t}_{n}tn​ by the atom in the time interval [0,t). We show that p[0{p}_{[0}p[0​,t) essentially factorizes into products of conditional densities c\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}(\ensuremath{\tau}) that, given a photon is emitted at time zero, the next photon emission occurs at time \ensuremath{\tau}. This enables a simulation of the individual photon emissions to be given which shows directly the existence of prolonged dark windows in the fluorescence corresponding to the shelving of the electron in the metastable state or ``quantum jumps.''
A quantum-statistical theory is developed for a single-atom, three-state quantum system where a strong (1-3) and a weak (2-3) transition are driven resonantly by an incoherent field. From a second-order correlation function of the fluorescence intensity, it is concluded that a quantum jump can occur, in the sense that the single atom can undergo large fluctuations between a state of full emission in the strong transition to a state of no emission when the electron is shelved in the metastable state (2).
A single-atom optical clock proposed over ten years ago utilizes an amplification scheme which only recently was recognized as a novel problem in quantum statistics. The atom, a three-state system, has two coupled transitions that are driven continuously by two external fields, one being an allowed transition (1\ensuremath{\leftrightarrows}3) and the other a forbidden transition (2\ensuremath{\leftrightarrows}3) where \ensuremath{\Vert}3〉 is the lowest state. It has been argued that the weak transition, which is difficult to detect, could be monitored by the presence or absence of spontaneous emission of the strong transition. Thus, when the atom is shelved in the metastable state \ensuremath{\Vert}2〉, the strong transition is extinguished, but when the atom executes a single quantum jump (2\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3), it triggers a succession of perhaps a million quantum jumps (macroscopic quantum jumps) in the strong transition, an amplification that can be detected easily. This intuitive argument for alternating bright and dark intervals assumes, however, that the atom is always in an eigenstate. Should the atom be in a superposition state, because of coherent excitation, one could imagine that the weak transition would merely reduce the intensity of the strong transition slightly. This issue is resolved, in favor of the first intuitive argument, by calculating the photon-counting statistics, the probability W(n,T) of observing precisely n photon-counting events in a collection T in a quantum-mechanically consistent way. The results cannot be described by classical statistics. A compact analytic form is obtained for W(n,T) by considering the entire hierarchy of correlation functions where the emission interval peaks sharply about a particular n with a Poisson distribution and can be comparable in length to the darkness interval (n=0) while the other values of n display vanishingly small probabilities.
According to the usual interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurement of an observable yields its eigenvalue. Extrapolation of classical reasoning then suggests that at every instant of time the quantum system actually is in one of the eigenstates of the observable, and as time goes on it executes random jumps between the states. In this spirit, Cook and Kimble1 have recently elaborated Dehmelt’s suggestion2 that fluorescence from a laser-driven two-level system weakly coupled to a third state may turn on and off when the atom jumps between the active two-level system and the inactive third state.