Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Europhysics news

Toward a global quantum network

Jian-Wei Pan

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

About 90 years ago, Albert Einstein complained about the “spooky action at a distance” of quantum entanglement and questioned the completeness of quantum mechanics [1]. This year, the Nobel Prize is awarded to three pioneers that put Einstein’s curiosity under experimental tests based on Bell’s inequality [2]. The fundamentals of quantum mechanics are not of just theoretical or philosophical interest. Rather, worldwide efforts are harnessing these quantum weirdness to develop emerging technologies.

DOI
10.1051/epn/2023104

Related papers

The Bell inequalities: Commentary on the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022

Hong-Yi Su, Jing‐Ling Chen

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded to three experiment physicists: Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, for their contributions to “experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”. In this paper, the history, basics, and applications related with the Bell inequalities are reviewed. The discussion of fundamental issues on quantum mechanics dated back to the year 1927 when the fifth Solvay conference was held, highlighting intense arguments between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. At the time, Einstein expressed, publicly for the first time, his critical attitude towards quantum mechanics. While the arguments did not reach a decisive conclusion, Bohr’s probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, the Copenhagen interpretation, had since been well circulated among the community. Einstein’s arguments with Bohr lasted many years after the conference. The arguably most famous one was the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, proposed in a 1935 paper written by the three authors. They stated, by flawless reasoning, that quantum mechanics is ‘incomplete’. Bohr replied immediately. So did Erwin Schrödinger, who, in particular, coined the term ‘entangled’ for the first time to describe the bizarre quantum mechanical property. Nevertheless, the EPR paper received few citations at its publication, until 1990’s when quantum information science started blossoming. From today’s perspective, the paper resembles the ‘sleeping beauty’ who slumbered for decades before fully awakening. It has been widely accepted that it was John S. Bell who eventually resolved the EPR paradox. But many important figures before him should not go unnoticed, including John A. Wheeler, Chien-Shiung Wu, David Bohm, to name a few. In 1964, Bell wrote down a mathematical inequality which satisfies local hidden variable theory but which can be violated in quantum mechanics. The significance is that Bell’s inequality brings the rather philosophic debates on the EPR paradox down to be experimentally testable. Hence, an experiment is here appealing, as is the case in all fields of physics. To the end, John F. Clauser, alongside Stuart J. Freedman, conducted an experiment in 1972 to test a Bell inequality, the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality, proposed by him and his collaborators in 1969. The results, however, leaves loopholes open. One of the loopholes was closed in a later experiment led by Alain Aspect in 1982. The Bell-CHSH inequality was later tested under a much stricter condition by Anton Zeilinger’s team. Two most important loopholes were both closed by three teams in 2015 independently. Zeilinger’s team was among them. Almost all experiments to date have confirmed quantum mechanical predictions. Zeilinger’s team also performed the first teleportation of unknown quantum states, the first entanglement swapping, along with other contributions pioneering the quantum information science. In retrospect, the foundational study of quantum theory has been developed over a century. It once drew much of quantum physics founders’ attention, went virtually unnoticed while other physical fields advanced, had for quite a while been considered to have very weak relationship with major physics, and finally revived in recent decades leading to rapid progress in quantum information science and quantum technology. We believe that the Nobel Prize in Physics this year is not only an award and recognition to past achievements, but also heralds a new era of science in future.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)•Oct 26, 2022•2 citations

A new horizon for quantum information

Michelle Yvonne Simmons

Since 2000, several landmark results in quantum information have catapulted the field to one of the most exciting in science. From the demonstration of Shor’s factorisation algorithm that threatens the long-term security of public-key cryptography, to the teleportation of super-position states, the demonstration of error-correcting codes and the development of topologically protected qubits, our ability to control the quantum world is ever increasing. Matched by elegant experiments to test the fundamentals of quantum physics, such as the recent demonstration of the loop-hole free violation of Bell's inequality, 1 , 2 these exciting achievements are all emerging just at the time when information technology is beginning to enter the quantum regime.

npj Quantum Information•Oct 26, 2015•2 citations

Physics Nobel honors foundational quantum entanglement experiments

Heather M. Hill

The laureates brought the conceptual features of quantum physics back to mainstream interest.

Physics Today•Dec 1, 2022•13 citations

The 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for entanglement and quantum information: the new revolution in quantum mechanics and science

Vasil Dinev Penchev

The paper discusses this years Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of classical quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli's particle paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals spookily (by Einstein's flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein's gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the secondary quantization of the Standard model.

•Mar 13, 2023•0 citations

One hundred years of quantum mechanics

Marlan O. Scully, William George Unruh

Quantum mechanics has gone from a theory in test to becoming the foundation of new technologies.

Science•Dec 4, 2025•3 citations

Nobel Prize 2022 in Honor of Quantum Physics

Nougaoui, Abdelkrim

The Nobel Prize in Physics for the year 2022 was awarded to the three physicists: the French Alain Aspect, the American John F. Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their pioneering work in quantum physics experimentation. The three physicists were rewarded for their decisive experiments concerning entanglement quantum states, which will open up new horizons for the quantum computing, quantum coded-communication, quantum network etc. Thus the three physicists have highlighted the property that Einstein never wanted to admit and he has regarded it as a strange action. Quantum theory did really develop until the 1920s years, knowing that it took the probabilistic bent, and as result, the physicists who gave it its first germs found themselves in disagreement with their own points of view. On the one hand, Bohr and with him the Copenhagen point of view and Einstein with EPR point of view, which where at the heart of a debate that took the form of controversy that only erupted with the death of one of the protagonist, Einstein which is the first to have imagined the entanglement property.

New Journal for Science Vulgarization•Feb 17, 2023•0 citations
About 90 years ago, Albert Einstein complained about the “spooky action at a distance” of quantum entanglement and questioned the completeness of quantum mechanics [1]. This year, the Nobel Prize is awarded to three pioneers that put Einstein’s curiosity under experimental tests based on Bell’s inequality [2]. The fundamentals of quantum mechanics are not of just theoretical or philosophical interest. Rather, worldwide efforts are harnessing these quantum weirdness to develop emerging technologies.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded to three experiment physicists: Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, for their contributions to “experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”. In this paper, the history, basics, and applications related with the Bell inequalities are reviewed. The discussion of fundamental issues on quantum mechanics dated back to the year 1927 when the fifth Solvay conference was held, highlighting intense arguments between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. At the time, Einstein expressed, publicly for the first time, his critical attitude towards quantum mechanics. While the arguments did not reach a decisive conclusion, Bohr’s probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, the Copenhagen interpretation, had since been well circulated among the community. Einstein’s arguments with Bohr lasted many years after the conference. The arguably most famous one was the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, proposed in a 1935 paper written by the three authors. They stated, by flawless reasoning, that quantum mechanics is ‘incomplete’. Bohr replied immediately. So did Erwin Schrödinger, who, in particular, coined the term ‘entangled’ for the first time to describe the bizarre quantum mechanical property. Nevertheless, the EPR paper received few citations at its publication, until 1990’s when quantum information science started blossoming. From today’s perspective, the paper resembles the ‘sleeping beauty’ who slumbered for decades before fully awakening. It has been widely accepted that it was John S. Bell who eventually resolved the EPR paradox. But many important figures before him should not go unnoticed, including John A. Wheeler, Chien-Shiung Wu, David Bohm, to name a few. In 1964, Bell wrote down a mathematical inequality which satisfies local hidden variable theory but which can be violated in quantum mechanics. The significance is that Bell’s inequality brings the rather philosophic debates on the EPR paradox down to be experimentally testable. Hence, an experiment is here appealing, as is the case in all fields of physics. To the end, John F. Clauser, alongside Stuart J. Freedman, conducted an experiment in 1972 to test a Bell inequality, the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality, proposed by him and his collaborators in 1969. The results, however, leaves loopholes open. One of the loopholes was closed in a later experiment led by Alain Aspect in 1982. The Bell-CHSH inequality was later tested under a much stricter condition by Anton Zeilinger’s team. Two most important loopholes were both closed by three teams in 2015 independently. Zeilinger’s team was among them. Almost all experiments to date have confirmed quantum mechanical predictions. Zeilinger’s team also performed the first teleportation of unknown quantum states, the first entanglement swapping, along with other contributions pioneering the quantum information science. In retrospect, the foundational study of quantum theory has been developed over a century. It once drew much of quantum physics founders’ attention, went virtually unnoticed while other physical fields advanced, had for quite a while been considered to have very weak relationship with major physics, and finally revived in recent decades leading to rapid progress in quantum information science and quantum technology. We believe that the Nobel Prize in Physics this year is not only an award and recognition to past achievements, but also heralds a new era of science in future.
Since 2000, several landmark results in quantum information have catapulted the field to one of the most exciting in science. From the demonstration of Shor’s factorisation algorithm that threatens the long-term security of public-key cryptography, to the teleportation of super-position states, the demonstration of error-correcting codes and the development of topologically protected qubits, our ability to control the quantum world is ever increasing. Matched by elegant experiments to test the fundamentals of quantum physics, such as the recent demonstration of the loop-hole free violation of Bell's inequality, 1 , 2 these exciting achievements are all emerging just at the time when information technology is beginning to enter the quantum regime.
The paper discusses this years Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of classical quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli's particle paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals spookily (by Einstein's flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein's gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the secondary quantization of the Standard model.
The Nobel Prize in Physics for the year 2022 was awarded to the three physicists: the French Alain Aspect, the American John F. Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their pioneering work in quantum physics experimentation. The three physicists were rewarded for their decisive experiments concerning entanglement quantum states, which will open up new horizons for the quantum computing, quantum coded-communication, quantum network etc. Thus the three physicists have highlighted the property that Einstein never wanted to admit and he has regarded it as a strange action. Quantum theory did really develop until the 1920s years, knowing that it took the probabilistic bent, and as result, the physicists who gave it its first germs found themselves in disagreement with their own points of view. On the one hand, Bohr and with him the Copenhagen point of view and Einstein with EPR point of view, which where at the heart of a debate that took the form of controversy that only erupted with the death of one of the protagonist, Einstein which is the first to have imagined the entanglement property.