Influence Maximization (IM), which seeks a small set of important nodes that spread the influence widely into the network, is a fundamental problem in social networks. It finds applications in viral marketing, epidemic control, and assessing cascading failures within complex systems. Despite the huge amount of effort, finding near-optimal solutions for IM is difficult due to its NP-completeness. In this paper, we propose the first social quantum computing approaches for IM, aiming to retrieve near-optimal solutions. We propose a two-phase algorithm that 1) converts IM into a Max-Cover instance and 2) provides efficient quadratic unconstrained binary optimization formulations to solve the Max-Cover instance on quantum annealers. Our experiments on the state-of-the-art D-Wave annealer indicate better solution quality compared to classical simulated annealing, suggesting the potential of applying quantum annealing to find high-quality solutions for IM.
Influence Maximization (IM), which seeks a small set of important nodes that spread the influence widely into the network, is a fundamental problem in social networks. It finds applications in viral marketing, epidemic control, and assessing cascading failures within complex systems. Despite the huge amount of effort, finding near-optimal solutions for IM is difficult due to its NP-completeness. In this paper, we propose the first social quantum computing approaches for IM, aiming to retrieve near-optimal solutions. We propose a two-phase algorithm that 1) converts IM into a Max-Cover instance and 2) provides efficient quadratic unconstrained binary optimization formulations to solve the Max-Cover instance on quantum annealers. Our experiments on the state-of-the-art D-Wave annealer indicate better solution quality compared to classical simulated annealing, suggesting the potential of applying quantum annealing to find high-quality solutions for IM.
The recent availability of the first commercial quantum computers has provided a promising tool to tackle NP hard problems which can only be solved heuristically with present techniques. However, it is unclear if the current state of quantum computing already provides a quantum advantage over the current state of the art in classical computing. This article assesses the performance of the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer on two NP hard graph problems, in particular clique finding and graph partitioning. For this, we provide formulations as Qubo and Ising Hamiltonians suitable for the quantum annealer and compare a variety of quantum solvers (Sapi, QBSolv, QSage provided by D-Wave Sys, Inc.) to current classical algorithms (METIS, Simulated Annealing, third-party clique finding and graph splitting heuristics) on certain test sets of graphs. We demonstrate that for small graph instances, classical methods still outperform the quantum annealer in terms of computing time, even though the quality of the best solutions obtained is comparable. Nevertheless, due to the limited problem size which can be embedded on the D-Wave 2X chip, the aforementioned finding applies to most of problems of general nature solvable on the quantum annealer. For instances specifically designed to fit the D-Wave 2X architecture, we observe substantial speed-ups in computing time over classical approaches.
The Max-Cover is a NP-hard problem. Therefore, the heuristic approach is suitable to solve this problem for large instances. Quantum annealing is a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm that can be used to handle the Max-Cover problem. Recent developments in quantum technology allows creating programmable quantum processors to implement the quantum annealing technique. In this article, we apply the quantum annealing approach to solve the Max-Cover problem. The experimental results show that this approach gives better results than Simulated Annealing in terms of both solution quality and annealing time.
Quantum annealers can be used to solve many (possibly NP-hard) combinatorial optimization problems, by formulating them as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems or, equivalently, using the Ising formulation. In this paper we analyse the ability of quantum D-Wave annealers to find the maximum clique on a graph, expressed as a QUBO problem. Due to the embedding limit of 164 nodes imposed by the anneler, we conducted a study on graph decomposition to enable instance embedding. We thus propose a decomposition algorithm for the complementary maximum independent set problem, and a graph generation algorithm to control the number of nodes, the number of cliques, the density, the connectivity indices and the ratio of the solution size to the number of other nodes. We then statistically analysed how these variables affect the quality of the solutions found by the quantum annealer. The results of our investigation include recommendations on ratio and density limits not to be exceeded, as well as a series of precautions and a priori analyses to be carried out in order to maximise the probability of obtaining a solution close to the optimum.
This paper assesses the performance of the D-Wave 2X (DW) quantum annealer for finding a maximum clique in a graph, one of the most fundamental and important NP-hard problems. Because the size of the largest graphs DW can directly solve is quite small (usually around 45 vertices), we also consider decomposition algorithms intended for larger graphs and analyze their performance. For smaller graphs that fit DW, we provide formulations of the maximum clique problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which is one of the two input types (together with the Ising model) acceptable by the machine, and compare several quantum implementations to current classical algorithms such as simulated annealing, Gurobi, and third-party clique finding heuristics. We further estimate the contributions of the quantum phase of the quantum annealer and the classical post-processing phase typically used to enhance each solution returned by DW. We demonstrate that on random graphs that fit DW, no quantum speedup can be observed compared with the classical algorithms. On the other hand, for instances specifically designed to fit well the DW qubit interconnection network, we observe substantial speed-ups in computing time over classical approaches.
This paper assesses the performance of the D-Wave 2X (DW) quantum annealer for finding a maximum clique in a graph, one of the most fundamental and important NP-hard problems. Because the size of the largest graphs DW can directly solve is quite small (usually around 45 vertices), we also consider decomposition algorithms intended for larger graphs and analyze their performance. For smaller graphs that fit DW, we provide formulations of the maximum clique problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which is one of the two input types (together with the Ising model) acceptable by the machine, and compare several quantum implementations to current classical algorithms such as simulated annealing, Gurobi, and third-party clique finding heuristics. We further estimate the contributions of the quantum phase of the quantum annealer and the classical post-processing phase typically used to enhance each solution returned by DW. We demonstrate that on random graphs that fit DW, no quantum speedup can be observed compared with the classical algorithms. On the other hand, for instances specifically designed to fit well the DW qubit interconnection network, we observe substantial speed-ups in computing time over classical approaches.
This paper assesses the performance of the D-Wave 2X (DW) quantum annealer for finding a maximum clique in a graph, one of the most fundamental and important NP-hard problems. Because the size of the largest graphs DW can directly solve is quite small (usually around 45 vertices), we also consider decomposition algorithms intended for larger graphs and analyze their performance. For smaller graphs that fit DW, we provide formulations of the maximum clique problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which is one of the two input types (together with the Ising model) acceptable by the machine, and compare several quantum implementations to current classical algorithms such as simulated annealing, Gurobi, and third-party clique finding heuristics. We further estimate the contributions of the quantum phase of the quantum annealer and the classical post-processing phase typically used to enhance each solution returned by DW. We demonstrate that on random graphs that fit DW, no quantum speedup can be observed compared with the classical algorithms. On the other hand, for instances specifically designed to fit well the DW qubit interconnection network, we observe substantial speed-ups in computing time over classical approaches.