Belief Propagation Improvement Algorithm for LDPC Codes with Short Cycles

Kyuhyuk Chung, Jun Heo

In this paper, we improve performance of Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes by adding a large number of short cycles. Short cycles, especially cycles of length 4, degrade performance of LDPC codes if the standard BP (Belief Propagation) decoding is used. Therefore current researches have focused on removing cycles of length 4 for designing good performance LDPC codes. We found that a large number of cycles of length 4 improve performance of LDPC codes if a modified BP decoding is used. We present the modified BP decoding algorithm for LDPC codes with a large number of short cycles. We show that the modified BP decoding performance of LDPC codes with a large number of short cycles is better than the standard BP decoding performance of LDPC codes designed by avoiding short cycles.

Wenshuo Zhang, Liming Zheng, Yue Wu +2 more

Kyuhyuk Chung

In this paper, we improve performance of Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes with adding a large number of short cycles. Short cycles, especially cycles of length 4, degrade performance of LDPC codes if the standard BP (Belief Propagation) decoding is used. Therefore current researches have focused on removing cycles of length 4 for designing good performance LDPC codes. We found that a large number of cycles of length 4 improve performance of LDPC codes if a modified BP decoding is used. We present the modified BP decoding algorithm for LDPC codes with a large number of short cycles. We show that the modified BP decoding performance of LDPC codes with a large number of short cycles is better than the standard BP decoding performance of LDPC codes designed by avoiding short cycles.

Yimo Zhen, Jinhui Chen, Zhan Zhang Xu +1 more

J. Chen

Ali Karimi-lenji, Monireh Houshmand, Fahimeh Zarmehi

Summary The simplicity of decoding is one of the most important characteristics of the low density parity check (LDPC) codes. Belief propagation (BP) decoding algorithm is a well‐known decoding algorithm for LDPC codes. Most LDPC codes with long lengths have short cycles in their Tanner graphs, which reduce the performance of the BP algorithm. In this paper, we present 2 methods to improve the BP decoding algorithm for LDPC codes. In these methods, the calculation of the variable nodes is controlled by using “multiplicative correction factor” and “additive correction factor.” These factors are obtained for 2 separate channels, namely additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and binary symmetric channel (BSC), as 2 functions of code and channel parameters. Moreover, we use the BP‐based method in the calculation of the check nodes, which reduces the required resources. Simulation results show the proposed algorithm has better performance and lower decoding error as compared to BP and similar methods like normalized‐BP and offset‐BP algorithms.