With quantum computing (QC) maturing, high-performance computing (HPC) centers are already preparing to host early-phase production versions of such systems. Unlike their experimental predecessors in physics laboratories, with a very small and dedicated user community, this next generation of systems needs to serve a wider user community and must work in concert with existing HPC systems and software stacks. This article describes our vision for an integrated ecosystem that combines existing HPC and evolving quantum software stacks into a single system to enable a common and continuous user experience. This integration comes with several major challenges as quantum systems pose significantly different requirements including increased need for compilation at run time, long optimization times, statistical evaluations of results, and the need to work with few centralized resources. To overcome these challenges, new scheduling approaches on the HPC side and new programming approaches on the QC side are required.
With quantum computing (QC) maturing, high-performance computing (HPC) centers are already preparing to host early-phase production versions of such systems. Unlike their experimental predecessors in physics laboratories, with a very small and dedicated user community, this next generation of systems needs to serve a wider user community and must work in concert with existing HPC systems and software stacks. This article describes our vision for an integrated ecosystem that combines existing HPC and evolving quantum software stacks into a single system to enable a common and continuous user experience. This integration comes with several major challenges as quantum systems pose significantly different requirements including increased need for compilation at run time, long optimization times, statistical evaluations of results, and the need to work with few centralized resources. To overcome these challenges, new scheduling approaches on the HPC side and new programming approaches on the QC side are required.
As quantum computing systems mature and move from laboratories to production computing environments, corresponding software stacks are becoming key for their successful utilization. In particular, the expected use of quantum systems as HPC accelerators requires a deep integration with the existing and widely deployed HPC software stacks. Additionally, new requirements such as dynamic compilation and new challenges for tools and programming models must be considered. We tackle these challenges by developing the Munich Quantum Software Stack—a comprehensive initiative by the Munich Quantum Valley to offer a flexible, efficient, and user-oriented software environment. In this poster, we describe the core components and workflows, and how they will enable this transformation from quantum experiments to quantum accelerators.
Quantum computing is advancing rapidly, with notable progress in both hardware and algorithm development. However, to make quantum computing truly accessible and usable across disciplines, a comprehensive, efficient and unified software stack is essential. Such a software stack must be flexible enough to support diverse hardware platforms and evolving algorithms, while enabling programming models for a wide range of users from quantum specialists to users without deep quantum expertise. Additionally, a software stack must support dynamic resource management for efficient system utilization as well as seamless integration with classical High-Performance Computing (HPC) environments. The latter is key, as quantum systems are increasingly envisioned as accelerators within hybrid workflows, supporting various levels of integration from loosely to tightly coupled. Despite numerous discussions, conceptual proposals, and initial efforts in recent years, few tangible implementations of such full-featured software stacks currently exist.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum-classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum-classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum-classical HPC ecosystems.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum–classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum–classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum–classical HPC ecosystems.
Quantum computing (QC) introduces a novel mode of computation with the possibility of greater computational power that remains to be exploitedpresenting exciting opportunities for high-performance computing (HPC) applications. However, recent advancements in the field have made clear that QC does not supplant conventional HPC, but can rather be incorporated into current heterogeneous HPC infrastructures as an additional accelerator, thereby enabling the optimal utilization of both paradigms. The desire for such integration significantly affects the development of software for quantum computers, which in turn influences the necessary software infrastructure. To date, previous review articles have investigated various quantum programming tools (QPTs) (such as languages, libraries, frameworks) in their ability to program, compile, and execute quantum circuits. However, the integration effort with classical HPC frameworks or systems has not been addressed. This study aims to characterize existing QPTs from an HPC perspective, investigating if existing QPTs have the potential to be efficiently integrated with classical computing models and determining where work is still required. This work structures a set of criteria into an analysis blueprint that enables HPC scientists to assess whether a QPT is suitable for a high-performance computing quantum computing (HPCQC) environment.
The connection and eventual integration of High-Performance Computing (HPC) with Quantum Computing (QC) represents a transformative advancement in computational technology, promising significant enhancements in solving complex, previously intractable problems. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of HPC-QC interfacing, detailing architectural methodologies, software stack developments, middleware functionalities, and hardware integration strategies. It critically assesses existing hardware-level integration models, ranging from standalone and loosely-coupled architectures to tightly-integrated and on-node systems. The software ecosystem is analyzed, highlighting prominent frameworks such as Qiskit, PennyLane, CUDA-Q, and middleware solutions like Pilot-Quantum, essential for seamless hybrid computing environments. Furthermore, the manuscript discusses practical applications in optimization, machine learning, and many-body dynamics, where hybrid HPC-QC systems can offer substantial advantages. It also describes existing challenges, including hardware limitations (coherence, scalability, connectivity), software maturity, communication overhead, resource management complexities, and cost factors. Finally, future directions towards tighter hardware and software integration are discussed, emphasizing ongoing research developments and emerging trends that promise to expand the capabilities and accessibility of hybrid HPC-QC systems.