Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Classical Gates and Algorithms

Belal Ehsan Baaquie, L. C. Kwek

Published Jan 1, 2023• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-19-7517-2_3

Related papers

Implementation of Grover’s Algorithm & Bernstein-Vazirani Algorithm with IBM Qiskit

Yang-Che Liu, Meifeng Liu

Quantum logic gates differ from classical logic gates as the former involves quantum operators. The conventional gates such as AND, OR, NOT etc., are generally classified as classical gates, however, some of the quantum gates are known as Pauli gates, Toffoli gates and Hadamard gates, respectively. Normally classical states only involve 0 and 1, whereas quantum states involve the superpositions of 0 and 1. Hence, underlying principles of algorithm implementation for classical logic gate and quantum logic gate are indeed different. In this paper, we introduce significant concepts of quantum computations, analyse the discrepancy between classical and quantum gates, compare quantum algorithms using Qiskit against equivalent classical algorithms and analyse their performance in terms of runtime.

Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering•Feb 14, 2024•5 citations

Classical computation

A. Kitaev, Alexander Khanievich Shen', M. Vyalyi

Graduate studies in mathematics•May 31, 2002•1 citation

On Finding Sensitivity of Quantum and Classical Gates

Debajyoti Bera, Steven Homer

We consider a fault model of Boolean gates, both classical and quantum, where some of the inputs may not be connected to the actual gate hardware. This model is somewhat similar to the stuck-at model which is a very popular model in testing Boolean circuits. We consider the problem of detecting such faults; the detection algorithm can query the faulty gate and its complexity is the number of such queries. This problem is related to determining the sensitivity of Boolean functions. We show how quantum parallelism can be used to detect such faults. Specifically, we show that a quantum algorithm can detect such faults more efficiently than a classical algorithm for a Parity gate and an AND gate. We give explicit constructions of quantum detector algorithms and show lower bounds for classical algorithms. We show that the model for detecting such faults is similar to algebraic decision trees and extend some known results from quantum query complexity to prove some of our results. 1

•Jun 5, 2009•0 citations

Quantum Gates

Ray LaPierre

The Materials Research Society series•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Gates

Rajendra Kumar Bera

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Evolutionary Computation in Coded Communications: an Implementation of Viterbi Algorithm

Jamal S., Dia I., Mohammed Haw

Quantum Computing hopefully is the future of computing systems. It still on its first steps. The development of some quantum algorithms gives the quantum computing a boost on its importance. These algorithms (such as Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms) proved to have superior performance over classical algorithms [1-4]. The recent findings, that quantum error correction can be used, showed that the decoherence problem can be solved and hence the quantum computers can be realized [5-7]. The quantum algorithms are based on the use of special gates applied on one, two or more qubits (quantum bits). The classical computer uses different gates (NOT, AND, NAND, OR and XOR). Quantum gates are in many aspects different from classical gates where all gates must be reversible. This makes the quantum gates act as 2x2 transformation operators, where we have n input qubits and n output qubits. To understand the quantum bits and gates we describe the group of amplitudes that describes the state of a quantum register as a vector. A qubit with state 0 , which is

InTech eBooks•Oct 1, 2009•1 citation
Quantum logic gates differ from classical logic gates as the former involves quantum operators. The conventional gates such as AND, OR, NOT etc., are generally classified as classical gates, however, some of the quantum gates are known as Pauli gates, Toffoli gates and Hadamard gates, respectively. Normally classical states only involve 0 and 1, whereas quantum states involve the superpositions of 0 and 1. Hence, underlying principles of algorithm implementation for classical logic gate and quantum logic gate are indeed different. In this paper, we introduce significant concepts of quantum computations, analyse the discrepancy between classical and quantum gates, compare quantum algorithms using Qiskit against equivalent classical algorithms and analyse their performance in terms of runtime.
We consider a fault model of Boolean gates, both classical and quantum, where some of the inputs may not be connected to the actual gate hardware. This model is somewhat similar to the stuck-at model which is a very popular model in testing Boolean circuits. We consider the problem of detecting such faults; the detection algorithm can query the faulty gate and its complexity is the number of such queries. This problem is related to determining the sensitivity of Boolean functions. We show how quantum parallelism can be used to detect such faults. Specifically, we show that a quantum algorithm can detect such faults more efficiently than a classical algorithm for a Parity gate and an AND gate. We give explicit constructions of quantum detector algorithms and show lower bounds for classical algorithms. We show that the model for detecting such faults is similar to algebraic decision trees and extend some known results from quantum query complexity to prove some of our results. 1
Quantum Computing hopefully is the future of computing systems. It still on its first steps. The development of some quantum algorithms gives the quantum computing a boost on its importance. These algorithms (such as Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms) proved to have superior performance over classical algorithms [1-4]. The recent findings, that quantum error correction can be used, showed that the decoherence problem can be solved and hence the quantum computers can be realized [5-7]. The quantum algorithms are based on the use of special gates applied on one, two or more qubits (quantum bits). The classical computer uses different gates (NOT, AND, NAND, OR and XOR). Quantum gates are in many aspects different from classical gates where all gates must be reversible. This makes the quantum gates act as 2x2 transformation operators, where we have n input qubits and n output qubits. To understand the quantum bits and gates we describe the group of amplitudes that describes the state of a quantum register as a vector. A qubit with state 0 , which is