Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum explores different avenues regarding ensnared photons win the 2022 Nobel Prize in physical science

Daniel R Terry

Published Dec 10, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Trial of quantum abnormality and its potential genuine applications have been perceived with the 2022 Nobel Prize in physical science.\n\nAt a few level we are dependent upon quantum decides that even Albert Einstein battled to find a sense of peace with. Generally, these guidelines work out in the background in semiconductors that make up micro processors, lasers and, surprisingly, in the science of particles and atoms in materials surrounding us. Applications that originate from the current year's Nobel Prize exploit quantum highlights at bigger scopes. They incorporate totally secure correspondences and quantum PCs that may ultimately tackle issues that no possible ordinary PC could finish in the lifetime of the universe.\n\nThe current year's award is divided between three physicists. Alain Perspective and John Clauser affirmed that the guidelines of quantum mechanics, as peculiar and hard to accept as they are, truly rule the world, while Anton Zeilinger enjoys taken benefit of bizarre quantum conduct to foster simple applications that no customary innovation can coordinate. Every laureate will bring back home 33% of the award cash, which aggregates 10 million Swedish kronor, worth generally $915,000 as of October 4.\n\n"Today, we honor three physicists whose spearheading tests showed us that the peculiar universe of trap … isn't simply the miniature universe of iotas, and surely not the virtual universe of sci-fi or magic, yet it's this present reality that we as a whole live in," said Thors Hans Hansson, an individual from the Nobel Board for Physical science, at a question and answer session reporting the honor on October 4 at the Imperial Swedish Foundation of Sciences (SN: 11/5/10).\n\n"It was absolutely extremely energizing to find out about the three laureates," says physicist Jerry Chow of IBM Quantum in Yorktown Levels, N.Y. "Viewpoint, Zeilinger and Clauser — they're all extremely, notable in our quantum local area, and their work is something that is truly been a major piece of many individuals' exploration endeavors over numerous years."\n\nPerspective, of the Université Paris-Saclay and École Polytechnique in France, and Clauser, who presently runs an organization in California, showed that there are no confidential back channels of correspondence that make sense of how two particles can exist as a solitary element, despite the fact that they are far separated (SN: 12/29/14).\n\nThe analyses of Zeilinger, of the College of Vienna, that depend on that quantum conduct incorporate exhibitions of interchanges, totally secure encryption and parts urgent for quantum PCs. He spearheaded another, broadly misconstrued, application — quantum instant transportation. Not at all like the instant transportation of individuals and items in sci-fi, the impact includes the ideal transmission of data about a quantum object starting with one spot then onto the next.\n\n"I was constantly keen on quantum mechanics from the absolute first minutes when I read about it," Zeilinger said through telephone at the news meeting reporting the honor. "I was really struck by a portion of the hypothetical expectations, since they didn't fit the typical instincts which one could have."\n\nThe revelation of quantum conduct that controls the world at little scopes, similar to the movement of an electron around an iota, upset physical science toward the start of the twentieth 100 years. Many driving researchers, most broadly including Einstein, recognized that quantum speculations worked, yet contended that they couldn't be the genuine depiction of the world since they required, best case scenario, ascertaining the probabilities that something would occur (SN: 1/12/22). To Einstein, this really intended that there was some secret data that investigations were too rough to even consider revealing.\n\nOthers trusted that quantum conduct, derogatively called oddness, however hard to comprehend, had no mysterious approaches to sending data. It was generally a question of assessment and discussion until physicist John Ringer proposed a test during the 1960s to demonstrate that there were no secret channels of correspondence among quantum objects (SN: 12/29/14). At the time obviously an examination to play out the test was conceivable.\n\nClauser was quick to foster a down to earth trial to affirm Ringer's test, despite the fact that there remained provisos his investigation couldn't really take a look at that left space for uncertainty. (His advantage in science grew early. In 1959 and 1960, Clauser contended in the Public Science Fair, presently known as the Global Science and Designing Fair (SN: 5/23/59). The fair is controlled by the General public for Science, which distributes Science News.)\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421594\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421608\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421634\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421642\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421652\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421671\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421680\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422291\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422303\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422363\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422370\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422712\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422718\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422735\n\nViewpoint took the thought further to dispose of any opportunity that quantum mechanics had some secret underpinnings of traditional material science (SN: 1/11/86). The investigations of Clauser and Viewpoint included making sets of photons that were ensnared, implying that they were basically a solitary item. As the photons moved every which way, they stayed ensnared. That is, they keep on existing as a solitary, expanded object. Estimating the attributes of one immediately uncovers qualities of the other, regardless of how far separated they might be.\n\nEntrapment is a fragile situation and is hard to keep up with, however the consequences of the trials of Clauser and Viewpoint show that quantum impacts can't be made sense of with any secret factors that would be indications of non-quantum underpinnings.\n\nTo Chow, the meaning of this examination is twofold. "There's actually a component of appearing, from a philosophical point, that quantum mechanics is genuine," he says. "However at that point, from the more down to earth outlook … this equivalent lovely hypothesis of quantum mechanics gives an alternate arrangement of rules by which data is handled." That, thusly, opens up new roads for cutting edge innovations like quantum PCs and correspondences (SN: 12/3/20).\n\nZeilinger's tests exploit entrapment to accomplish accomplishments that wouldn't be imaginable without the impacts that Clauser and Perspective affirmed. He has expanded the investigations from the lab to intercontinental distances, opening up the likelihood that entrapment can be put to commonsense use (SN: 5/31/12). Since collaborating with one of a couple of ensnared particles influences different, they can become key parts in secure correspondences and encryption. An untouchable attempting to tune in on a quantum dispatch would be uncovered on the grounds that they would break the entrapment as they sneaked around.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.7422739

Related papers

Nobel Prize 2022 in Honor of Quantum Physics

Nougaoui, Abdelkrim

The Nobel Prize in Physics for the year 2022 was awarded to the three physicists: the French Alain Aspect, the American John F. Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their pioneering work in quantum physics experimentation. The three physicists were rewarded for their decisive experiments concerning entanglement quantum states, which will open up new horizons for the quantum computing, quantum coded-communication, quantum network etc. Thus the three physicists have highlighted the property that Einstein never wanted to admit and he has regarded it as a strange action. Quantum theory did really develop until the 1920s years, knowing that it took the probabilistic bent, and as result, the physicists who gave it its first germs found themselves in disagreement with their own points of view. On the one hand, Bohr and with him the Copenhagen point of view and Einstein with EPR point of view, which where at the heart of a debate that took the form of controversy that only erupted with the death of one of the protagonist, Einstein which is the first to have imagined the entanglement property.

New Journal for Science Vulgarization•Feb 17, 2023•0 citations

Analysis for Science Librarians of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics: From Bell Inequalities to Quantum Information Science

Kayleigh Bohémier

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded equally to John F. Clauser, Anton Zeilinger, and Alain Aspect for their work that verified the absence of local hidden variables in entangled particles. This scientist profile provides an overview of the science behind this prize and analyzes each laureate’s citation patterns in the scholarly record, including top papers and noteworthy contributions.

Science & Technology Libraries•Dec 8, 2022•1 citation

The Bell inequalities: Commentary on the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022

Hong-Yi Su, Jing‐Ling Chen

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded to three experiment physicists: Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, for their contributions to “experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”. In this paper, the history, basics, and applications related with the Bell inequalities are reviewed. The discussion of fundamental issues on quantum mechanics dated back to the year 1927 when the fifth Solvay conference was held, highlighting intense arguments between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. At the time, Einstein expressed, publicly for the first time, his critical attitude towards quantum mechanics. While the arguments did not reach a decisive conclusion, Bohr’s probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, the Copenhagen interpretation, had since been well circulated among the community. Einstein’s arguments with Bohr lasted many years after the conference. The arguably most famous one was the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, proposed in a 1935 paper written by the three authors. They stated, by flawless reasoning, that quantum mechanics is ‘incomplete’. Bohr replied immediately. So did Erwin Schrödinger, who, in particular, coined the term ‘entangled’ for the first time to describe the bizarre quantum mechanical property. Nevertheless, the EPR paper received few citations at its publication, until 1990’s when quantum information science started blossoming. From today’s perspective, the paper resembles the ‘sleeping beauty’ who slumbered for decades before fully awakening. It has been widely accepted that it was John S. Bell who eventually resolved the EPR paradox. But many important figures before him should not go unnoticed, including John A. Wheeler, Chien-Shiung Wu, David Bohm, to name a few. In 1964, Bell wrote down a mathematical inequality which satisfies local hidden variable theory but which can be violated in quantum mechanics. The significance is that Bell’s inequality brings the rather philosophic debates on the EPR paradox down to be experimentally testable. Hence, an experiment is here appealing, as is the case in all fields of physics. To the end, John F. Clauser, alongside Stuart J. Freedman, conducted an experiment in 1972 to test a Bell inequality, the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality, proposed by him and his collaborators in 1969. The results, however, leaves loopholes open. One of the loopholes was closed in a later experiment led by Alain Aspect in 1982. The Bell-CHSH inequality was later tested under a much stricter condition by Anton Zeilinger’s team. Two most important loopholes were both closed by three teams in 2015 independently. Zeilinger’s team was among them. Almost all experiments to date have confirmed quantum mechanical predictions. Zeilinger’s team also performed the first teleportation of unknown quantum states, the first entanglement swapping, along with other contributions pioneering the quantum information science. In retrospect, the foundational study of quantum theory has been developed over a century. It once drew much of quantum physics founders’ attention, went virtually unnoticed while other physical fields advanced, had for quite a while been considered to have very weak relationship with major physics, and finally revived in recent decades leading to rapid progress in quantum information science and quantum technology. We believe that the Nobel Prize in Physics this year is not only an award and recognition to past achievements, but also heralds a new era of science in future.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)•Oct 26, 2022•2 citations

A kvantum-összefonódás és a 2022-es fizikai Nobel-díj • Quantum Entanglement and the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics

László Bacsárdi, Z. Kis

kapta az összefonódott fotonokkal végzett kísérleteikért, a Bell-egyenlőtlenségek megsértésének megállapításáért és a kvantuminformatika területén végzett úttörő munkásságukért.Ebben a cikkben megismertetjük az olvasót a kvantumfizika egyik legérdekesebb jelenségével, az összefonódással, amely számos kvantuminformatikai és kvantumkommunikációs alkalmazás alapegysége.Bemutatjuk a három Nobel-díjas fizikus kapcsolódó munkásságát, és kitérünk néhány olyan kvantuminformatikai területre és alkalmazásra, ahol az összefonódás fontos szerepet tölt be. aBSTraCTThe 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to the French Alain Aspect, the American John Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science.In this article, we introduce one of the most interesting phenomenon of quantum physics, the quantum entanglement which serves as a basic building block of many quantum computing and quantum communication applications.We present the related works of the three Nobel Prize-winning physicists, and cover some quantum computing areas and applications where entanglement plays an important role.

Magyar Tudomány•Jan 27, 2023•0 citations

The Laureates of the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022. Some personal memories

Reinhold A. Bertlmann

Some personal memories of the Nobel Prize Winners 2022 Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger are summarized and the significance of their works is described in a historical perspective.

arXiv:2302.03736•Feb 7, 2023•0 citations

Bell Inequalities, Entanglement, and Quantum Information

Joonwoo BAE

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 jointly to Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science. The present article provides a brief overview on the significance of their contributions and practical quantum information applications of Bell inequalities and entanglement.

Physics and High Technology•Dec 28, 2022•0 citations
Trial of quantum abnormality and its potential genuine applications have been perceived with the 2022 Nobel Prize in physical science.\n\nAt a few level we are dependent upon quantum decides that even Albert Einstein battled to find a sense of peace with. Generally, these guidelines work out in the background in semiconductors that make up micro processors, lasers and, surprisingly, in the science of particles and atoms in materials surrounding us. Applications that originate from the current year's Nobel Prize exploit quantum highlights at bigger scopes. They incorporate totally secure correspondences and quantum PCs that may ultimately tackle issues that no possible ordinary PC could finish in the lifetime of the universe.\n\nThe current year's award is divided between three physicists. Alain Perspective and John Clauser affirmed that the guidelines of quantum mechanics, as peculiar and hard to accept as they are, truly rule the world, while Anton Zeilinger enjoys taken benefit of bizarre quantum conduct to foster simple applications that no customary innovation can coordinate. Every laureate will bring back home 33% of the award cash, which aggregates 10 million Swedish kronor, worth generally $915,000 as of October 4.\n\n"Today, we honor three physicists whose spearheading tests showed us that the peculiar universe of trap … isn't simply the miniature universe of iotas, and surely not the virtual universe of sci-fi or magic, yet it's this present reality that we as a whole live in," said Thors Hans Hansson, an individual from the Nobel Board for Physical science, at a question and answer session reporting the honor on October 4 at the Imperial Swedish Foundation of Sciences (SN: 11/5/10).\n\n"It was absolutely extremely energizing to find out about the three laureates," says physicist Jerry Chow of IBM Quantum in Yorktown Levels, N.Y. "Viewpoint, Zeilinger and Clauser — they're all extremely, notable in our quantum local area, and their work is something that is truly been a major piece of many individuals' exploration endeavors over numerous years."\n\nPerspective, of the Université Paris-Saclay and École Polytechnique in France, and Clauser, who presently runs an organization in California, showed that there are no confidential back channels of correspondence that make sense of how two particles can exist as a solitary element, despite the fact that they are far separated (SN: 12/29/14).\n\nThe analyses of Zeilinger, of the College of Vienna, that depend on that quantum conduct incorporate exhibitions of interchanges, totally secure encryption and parts urgent for quantum PCs. He spearheaded another, broadly misconstrued, application — quantum instant transportation. Not at all like the instant transportation of individuals and items in sci-fi, the impact includes the ideal transmission of data about a quantum object starting with one spot then onto the next.\n\n"I was constantly keen on quantum mechanics from the absolute first minutes when I read about it," Zeilinger said through telephone at the news meeting reporting the honor. "I was really struck by a portion of the hypothetical expectations, since they didn't fit the typical instincts which one could have."\n\nThe revelation of quantum conduct that controls the world at little scopes, similar to the movement of an electron around an iota, upset physical science toward the start of the twentieth 100 years. Many driving researchers, most broadly including Einstein, recognized that quantum speculations worked, yet contended that they couldn't be the genuine depiction of the world since they required, best case scenario, ascertaining the probabilities that something would occur (SN: 1/12/22). To Einstein, this really intended that there was some secret data that investigations were too rough to even consider revealing.\n\nOthers trusted that quantum conduct, derogatively called oddness, however hard to comprehend, had no mysterious approaches to sending data. It was generally a question of assessment and discussion until physicist John Ringer proposed a test during the 1960s to demonstrate that there were no secret channels of correspondence among quantum objects (SN: 12/29/14). At the time obviously an examination to play out the test was conceivable.\n\nClauser was quick to foster a down to earth trial to affirm Ringer's test, despite the fact that there remained provisos his investigation couldn't really take a look at that left space for uncertainty. (His advantage in science grew early. In 1959 and 1960, Clauser contended in the Public Science Fair, presently known as the Global Science and Designing Fair (SN: 5/23/59). The fair is controlled by the General public for Science, which distributes Science News.)\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421594\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421608\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421634\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421642\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421652\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421671\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421680\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422291\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422303\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422363\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422370\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422712\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422718\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422735\n\nViewpoint took the thought further to dispose of any opportunity that quantum mechanics had some secret underpinnings of traditional material science (SN: 1/11/86). The investigations of Clauser and Viewpoint included making sets of photons that were ensnared, implying that they were basically a solitary item. As the photons moved every which way, they stayed ensnared. That is, they keep on existing as a solitary, expanded object. Estimating the attributes of one immediately uncovers qualities of the other, regardless of how far separated they might be.\n\nEntrapment is a fragile situation and is hard to keep up with, however the consequences of the trials of Clauser and Viewpoint show that quantum impacts can't be made sense of with any secret factors that would be indications of non-quantum underpinnings.\n\nTo Chow, the meaning of this examination is twofold. "There's actually a component of appearing, from a philosophical point, that quantum mechanics is genuine," he says. "However at that point, from the more down to earth outlook … this equivalent lovely hypothesis of quantum mechanics gives an alternate arrangement of rules by which data is handled." That, thusly, opens up new roads for cutting edge innovations like quantum PCs and correspondences (SN: 12/3/20).\n\nZeilinger's tests exploit entrapment to accomplish accomplishments that wouldn't be imaginable without the impacts that Clauser and Perspective affirmed. He has expanded the investigations from the lab to intercontinental distances, opening up the likelihood that entrapment can be put to commonsense use (SN: 5/31/12). Since collaborating with one of a couple of ensnared particles influences different, they can become key parts in secure correspondences and encryption. An untouchable attempting to tune in on a quantum dispatch would be uncovered on the grounds that they would break the entrapment as they sneaked around.
The Nobel Prize in Physics for the year 2022 was awarded to the three physicists: the French Alain Aspect, the American John F. Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their pioneering work in quantum physics experimentation. The three physicists were rewarded for their decisive experiments concerning entanglement quantum states, which will open up new horizons for the quantum computing, quantum coded-communication, quantum network etc. Thus the three physicists have highlighted the property that Einstein never wanted to admit and he has regarded it as a strange action. Quantum theory did really develop until the 1920s years, knowing that it took the probabilistic bent, and as result, the physicists who gave it its first germs found themselves in disagreement with their own points of view. On the one hand, Bohr and with him the Copenhagen point of view and Einstein with EPR point of view, which where at the heart of a debate that took the form of controversy that only erupted with the death of one of the protagonist, Einstein which is the first to have imagined the entanglement property.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded to three experiment physicists: Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, for their contributions to “experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”. In this paper, the history, basics, and applications related with the Bell inequalities are reviewed. The discussion of fundamental issues on quantum mechanics dated back to the year 1927 when the fifth Solvay conference was held, highlighting intense arguments between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. At the time, Einstein expressed, publicly for the first time, his critical attitude towards quantum mechanics. While the arguments did not reach a decisive conclusion, Bohr’s probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, the Copenhagen interpretation, had since been well circulated among the community. Einstein’s arguments with Bohr lasted many years after the conference. The arguably most famous one was the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, proposed in a 1935 paper written by the three authors. They stated, by flawless reasoning, that quantum mechanics is ‘incomplete’. Bohr replied immediately. So did Erwin Schrödinger, who, in particular, coined the term ‘entangled’ for the first time to describe the bizarre quantum mechanical property. Nevertheless, the EPR paper received few citations at its publication, until 1990’s when quantum information science started blossoming. From today’s perspective, the paper resembles the ‘sleeping beauty’ who slumbered for decades before fully awakening. It has been widely accepted that it was John S. Bell who eventually resolved the EPR paradox. But many important figures before him should not go unnoticed, including John A. Wheeler, Chien-Shiung Wu, David Bohm, to name a few. In 1964, Bell wrote down a mathematical inequality which satisfies local hidden variable theory but which can be violated in quantum mechanics. The significance is that Bell’s inequality brings the rather philosophic debates on the EPR paradox down to be experimentally testable. Hence, an experiment is here appealing, as is the case in all fields of physics. To the end, John F. Clauser, alongside Stuart J. Freedman, conducted an experiment in 1972 to test a Bell inequality, the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality, proposed by him and his collaborators in 1969. The results, however, leaves loopholes open. One of the loopholes was closed in a later experiment led by Alain Aspect in 1982. The Bell-CHSH inequality was later tested under a much stricter condition by Anton Zeilinger’s team. Two most important loopholes were both closed by three teams in 2015 independently. Zeilinger’s team was among them. Almost all experiments to date have confirmed quantum mechanical predictions. Zeilinger’s team also performed the first teleportation of unknown quantum states, the first entanglement swapping, along with other contributions pioneering the quantum information science. In retrospect, the foundational study of quantum theory has been developed over a century. It once drew much of quantum physics founders’ attention, went virtually unnoticed while other physical fields advanced, had for quite a while been considered to have very weak relationship with major physics, and finally revived in recent decades leading to rapid progress in quantum information science and quantum technology. We believe that the Nobel Prize in Physics this year is not only an award and recognition to past achievements, but also heralds a new era of science in future.
kapta az összefonódott fotonokkal végzett kísérleteikért, a Bell-egyenlőtlenségek megsértésének megállapításáért és a kvantuminformatika területén végzett úttörő munkásságukért.Ebben a cikkben megismertetjük az olvasót a kvantumfizika egyik legérdekesebb jelenségével, az összefonódással, amely számos kvantuminformatikai és kvantumkommunikációs alkalmazás alapegysége.Bemutatjuk a három Nobel-díjas fizikus kapcsolódó munkásságát, és kitérünk néhány olyan kvantuminformatikai területre és alkalmazásra, ahol az összefonódás fontos szerepet tölt be. aBSTraCTThe 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to the French Alain Aspect, the American John Clauser and the Austrian Anton Zeilinger for their experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science.In this article, we introduce one of the most interesting phenomenon of quantum physics, the quantum entanglement which serves as a basic building block of many quantum computing and quantum communication applications.We present the related works of the three Nobel Prize-winning physicists, and cover some quantum computing areas and applications where entanglement plays an important role.