Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Dual views of the generalized degree of purity

Avik Bhattacharya, Subhadip Dey, Alejandro C. Frery, José J. Gil

Published Nov 4, 2022• 4 citations

Abstract

Several approaches and descriptors have been proposed to characterize the purity of coherency or density matrices describing physical states, including the polarimetric purity of 2D and 3D partially polarized waves. This work introduces two interpretations of the degree of purity: one derived from statistics and another from algebra. In the first one, the degree purity is expressed in terms of the mean and standard deviation of the eigenvalue spectrum of the density or coherency matrix of the corresponding state. The second one expresses the purity in terms of two specific measures obtained by decomposing the coherency matrix as a sum of traceless symmetric, antisymmetric, and scalar matrices. We believe these two approaches offer better insights into the purity measure. Furthermore, interesting relations with existing quantities in polarization optics also are described.

DOI: 10.1364/josaa.476423

Related papers

Sources of Asymmetry and the Concept of Nonregularity of n-Dimensional Density Matrices

José J. Gil

The information contained in an n-dimensional (nD) density matrix ρ is parametrized and interpreted in terms of its asymmetry properties through the introduction of a family of components of purity that are invariant with respect to arbitrary rotations of the nD Cartesian reference frame and that are composed of two categories of meaningful parameters of different physical nature: the indices of population asymmetry and the intrinsic coherences. It is found that the components of purity coincide, up to respective simple coefficients, with the intrinsic Stokes parameters, which are also introduced in this work, and that determine two complementary sources of purity, namely the population asymmetry and the correlation asymmetry, whose weighted square average equals the overall degree of purity of ρ. A discriminating decomposition of ρ as a convex sum of three density matrices, viz. the pure, the fully random (maximally mixed) and the discriminating component, is introduced, which allows for the definition of the degree of nonregularity of ρ as the distance from ρ to a density matrix of a system composed of a pure component and a set of 2D, 3D,… and nD maximally mixed components. The chiral properties of a state ρ are analyzed and characterized from its intimate link to the degree of correlation asymmetry. The results presented constitute a generalization to nD systems of those established and exploited for polarization density matrices in a series of previous works.

SymmetryJun 12, 202010 citations

Descriptors of dimensionality for n × n density matrices

José J. Gil, Andreas Norrman, Ari T. Friberg +1 more

Abstract By using the recently introduced parametrization of an n-dimensional density matrix in terms of the indices of population asymmetry and the intrinsic coherences, we define descriptors in both integer and continuous forms of the effective dimension that take place for a complete description of a density matrix, thus providing accurate information beyond the rank of the density matrix. The concepts of dimensional folding, hidden dimensional purity, and dimensional entropy are introduced and discussed in view of the new approach presented. The results are applicable to any physical system represented by a density matrix, such as n-level quantum systems, qutrits, sets of interacting pencils of radiation, classical polarization states, and to transformations of density matrices, as occurs with quantum channels.

The European Physical Journal PlusMay 29, 20233 citations

Reduced purities as measures of decoherence in many-electron systems

Franco, I., Appel, H.

rarchy of measures of decoherence for many-electron systems that is based on the purity and the hierarchy of reduced electronic density matrices is presented. These reduced purities can be used to characterize electronic decoherence in the common case when the many-body electronic density matrix is not known and only reduced information about the electronic subsystem is available. Being defined from reduced electronic quantities, the interpretation of the reduced purities is more intricate than the usual (many-body) purity. This is because the nonidempotency of the r-body reduced electronic density matrix that is the basis of the reduced purity measures can arise due to decoherence or due to electronic correlations. To guide the interpretation, explicit expressions are provided for the one-body and two-body reduced purities for a general electronic state. Using them, the information content and structure of the one-body and two-body reduced purities is established, and limits on the changes that decoherence can induce are elucidated. The practical use of the reduced purities to understand decoherence dynamics in many-electron systems is exemplified through an analysis of the electronic decoherence dynamics in a model molecular system.

Jan 1, 20137 citations

Degree of Purity for 2X2 Density Matrix and Its Use in Quantum Information Theory

Rubens Viana Ramos, Rui Fragassi Souza

There are many coincidences that relate the treatment of quantum states in a two-dimensional space and the classical polarisation treatment, due to some similarities that occur in coherence matrix and density matrix.We use these similarities to separate the density matrix in a mixture of a pure state and a maximally mixed state.This mixture is controlled by the degree of purity, that measures how much pure is a quantum state, such as usually done with the coherence matrix of a partially polarised beam.After that, we use this degree of purity in quantum information theory.We find out its relationship with the von Neumann entropy and its use in quantum Kolmogorov distance, fidelity and mutual information.

Anais de XXXV Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de SinaisJan 1, 20010 citations

Reduced purities as measures of decoherence in many-electron systems

Ignacio Franco, Heiko Appel

A hierarchy of measures of decoherence for many-electron systems that is based on the purity and the hierarchy of reduced electronic density matrices is presented. These reduced purities can be used to characterize electronic decoherence in the common case when the many-body electronic density matrix is not known and only reduced information about the electronic subsystem is available. Being defined from reduced electronic quantities, the interpretation of the reduced purities is more intricate than the usual (many-body) purity. This is because the nonidempotency of the r-body reduced electronic density matrix that is the basis of the reduced purity measures can arise due to decoherence or due to electronic correlations. To guide the interpretation, explicit expressions are provided for the one-body and two-body reduced purities for a general electronic state. Using them, the information content and structure of the one-body and two-body reduced purities is established, and limits on the changes that decoherence can induce are elucidated. The practical use of the reduced purities to understand decoherence dynamics in many-electron systems is exemplified through an analysis of the electronic decoherence dynamics in a model molecular system.

arXiv:1309.1127The Journal of Chemical PhysicsSep 4, 20138 citations

Optical cross-purity

Ayman F. Abouraddy, Bahaa E. A. Saleh

Cross-spectral purity, a concept introduced by Mandel in 1961, refers to an optical field having identical spectra at two points whose superposition yields the same spectrum. Here, we generalize this concept after discretizing the modal structure of the field, so that cross-purity can then apply to any optical degree-of-freedom (DoF). Making use of two binary DoFs (polarization and two spatial modes), the separability of the associated 4×4 coherence matrix is the condition for cross-purity. We find that the rank of the coherence matrix (the number of non-zero eigenvalues) plays a surprising yet crucial role in determining optical cross-purity: whereas rank-1 and rank-2 fields are always cross-pure, rank-3 fields in contrast are never cross-pure, and only a subset of rank-4 fields are cross-pure.

Optics LettersJan 22, 20260 citations